| Literature DB >> 28959251 |
Sergio Triana1,2,3, Hans de Cock4, Robin A Ohm4, Giovanna Danies1, Han A B Wösten4, Silvia Restrepo1, Andrés F González Barrios2, Adriana Celis1,4.
Abstract
Malassezia species are lipophilic and lipid-dependent yeasts belonging to the human and animal microbiota. Typically, they are isolated from regions rich in sebaceous glands. They have been associated with dermatological diseases such as seborrheic dermatitis, pityriasis versicolor, atopic dermatitis, and folliculitis. The genomes of Malassezia globosa, Malassezia sympodialis, and Malassezia pachydermatis lack the genes related to fatty acid synthesis. Here, the lipid-synthesis pathways of these species, as well as of Malassezia furfur, and of an atypical M. furfur variant were reconstructed using genome data and Constraints Based Reconstruction and Analysis. To this end, the genomes of M. furfur CBS 1878 and the atypical M. furfur 4DS were sequenced and annotated. The resulting Enzyme Commission numbers and predicted reactions were similar to the other Malassezia strains despite the differences in their genome size. Proteomic profiling was utilized to validate flux distributions. Flux differences were observed in the production of steroids in M. furfur and in the metabolism of butanoate in M. pachydermatis. The predictions obtained via these metabolic reconstructions also suggested defects in the assimilation of palmitic acid in M. globosa, M. sympodialis, M. pachydermatis, and the atypical variant of M. furfur, but not in M. furfur. These predictions were validated via physiological characterization, showing the predictive power of metabolic network reconstructions to provide new clues about the metabolic versatility of Malassezia.Entities:
Keywords: FBA; Malassezia; genome; lipid metabolism; metabolic reconstruction
Year: 2017 PMID: 28959251 PMCID: PMC5603697 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01772
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Assembly statistics calculated by QUAST (Gurevich et al., 2013) and BEDtools (Quinlan and Hall, 2010).
| Atypical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | ||
| Number of contigs (≥0 bp) | 6,968 | 17,882 |
| Number of contigs (≥1,000 bp) | 1,249 | 877 |
| Total length (≥0 bp) | 15,780,944 | 14,951,138 |
| Total length (≥1,000 bp) | 13,644,665 | 8,614,553 |
| # Scaffolds | 2,084 | 3,577 |
| Largest scaffold | 110,895 | 562,614 |
| Total length | 14,194,927 | 10,380,899 |
| GC (%) | 63.95 | 63.01 |
| N50 | 23,366 | 42,453 |
| N75 | 10,269 | 2,449 |
| L50 | 171 | 50 |
| L75 | 400 | 295 |
| Number of Ns in the assembly (per 100 kb) | 41.75 | 127.69 |
| Average coverage | 605× | 861× |
Percentage of the genome with zero (0), one (1), or multiple (>1) matches in the Nucmer genome alignment (Boetzer and Pirovano, 2012) with a maximum gap between two adjacent matches in a cluster of 90 bp and a minimum length of a maximal exact match of 20 bp.
| Atypical | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nucmer | 0 | 1 | >1 | 0 | 1 | >1 | 0 | 1 | >1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | >1 | |
| Atypical | 0.1% | 92.9% | 7.0% | 3.9% | 43.2% | 52.8% | 98.1% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 96.6% | 3.3% | 0.0% | 94.6% | 5.4% | 0.0% |
| 12.6% | 75.1% | 12.3% | 0.0% | 69.1% | 30.8% | 96.4% | 3.6% | 0.1% | 95.1% | 4.9% | 0.0% | 93.2% | 6.7% | 0.0% | |
| 99.2% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 99.2% | 0.6% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 99.7% | 0.3% | 98.8% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 98.7% | 1.3% | 0.0% | |
| 97.5% | 2.5% | 0.0% | 97.5% | 1.6% | 1.0% | 98.7% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 99.8% | 0.2% | 96.6% | 3.4% | 0.0% | |
| 95.6% | 4.4% | 0.0% | 94.8% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 98.4% | 1.5% | 0.0% | 96.4% | 3.6% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 98.9% | 0.9% | |
Percentage of the genome with zero (0), or one or more (1) matches in the Promer genome alignment (Delcher et al., 2002) with a maximum gap between two adjacent matches in a cluster of 30 amino acids and a minimum length of a maximal exact match of six amino acids.
| Atypical | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promer | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Atypical | 0.10% | 99.90% | 3.40% | 96.60% | 49.60% | 50.40% | 44.50% | 55.50% | 44.50% | 55.50% |
| 11.80% | 88.20% | 0.00% | 100.00% | 76.70% | 23.30% | 73.10% | 26.90% | 70.70% | 29.30% | |
| 49.50% | 50.50% | 48.60% | 51.40% | 0.00% | 100.00% | 38.50% | 61.50% | 39.60% | 60.40% | |
| 40.30% | 59.70% | 39.20% | 60.80% | 33.60% | 66.40% | 0.00% | 100.00% | 28.40% | 71.60% | |
| 37.50% | 62.50% | 35.70% | 64.30% | 31.80% | 68.20% | 26.00% | 74.00% | 0.20% | 99.80% | |
Predicted biomass flux with the flux balance analysis.
| Strain | Biomass (mmol gDW-1 h-1) |
|---|---|
| 1.280 | |
| Atypical | 2.840 |
| 0.742 | |
| 1.087 | |
| 0.090 |
Proteomic profiling results of five strains of Malassezia during the exponential (T1) and stationary (T2) phase.
| Peptides | Proteins | Consensus | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | 1∗ | 2 | 3 | 4 | Mean ± SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Mean ± SD | proteins | Enzymes | Reactions |
| 12,017 | 8,990 | 6,236 | 8,214 | 8,864 ± 2,400 | 2,094 | 1,761 | 1,784 | 1,821 | 1,865 ± 154 | 1,284 | 430 | 770 | |
| 9,690 | 9,075 | 9,857 | 5,354 | 8,494 ± 2,120 | 2,098 | 1,929 | 2,015 | 1,521 | 1,890 ± 255 | 1,539 | 517 | 830 | |
| Atypical | 1,893 | 3,188 | 6,240 | 7,099 | 4,605 ± 2,466 | 864 | 730 | 1,146 | 1,103 | 960 ± 197 | 985 | 301 | 841 |
| Atypical | 5,055 | 3,971 | 2,349 | 5,286 | 4,165 ± 1,339 | 930 | 757 | 582 | 949 | 804 ± 171 | 805 | 250 | 789 |
| 7,185 | 9,093 | 7,707 | 8,509 | 8,123 ± 845 | 1,130 | 1,314 | 1,165 | 1,265 | 1,218 ± 85 | 1,118 | 362 | 716 | |
| 858 | 5,213 | 6,156 | 5,245 | 4,368 ± 2,380 | 333 | 844 | 1,130 | 997 | 826 ± 348 | 763 | 256 | 568 | |
| 2,465 | 3,359 | 4,440 | 5,625 | 3,972 ± 1,366 | 952 | 1,107 | 1,163 | 1,292 | 1,128 ± 140 | 1,023 | 337 | 578 | |
| 2,108 | 2,475 | 4,864 | 2,182 | 2,907 ± 1,314 | 816 | 918 | 1,234 | 816 | 946 ± 197 | 774 | 268 | 535 | |
| 3,737 | 2,414 | 2,200 | 2,586 | 2,734 ± 686 | 252 | 247 | 241 | 224 | 241 ± 12 | 201 | 101 | 248 | |
| 264 | 953 | 736 | 1,360 | 828 ± 456 | 71 | 140 | 63 | 190 | 116 ± 60 | 216 | 100 | 244 | |
Physiological characterization of Malassezia spp. by culturing in liquid minimal medium (MM) containing either Tw20 (Tween 20), Tw40 (Tween 40), Tw60 (Tween 60), Tw80 (Tween 80), OA (oleic acid), PA (palmitic acid), or DB (Dixon broth) during the first and second growth step.
| Strain | Tw20 | Tw40 | Tw60 | Tw80 | OA | PA | DB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First growth step | |||||||
| ++ | ++ | +/- | ++ | +/- | ++ | ++ | |
| Atypical | ++ | + | + | ++ | +/- | - | ++ |
| +/- | + | ++ | + | +/- | + | ++ | |
| +/- | +/- | +/- | +/- | +/- | + | ++ | |
| +/- | +/- | +/- | +/- | +/- | + | ++ | |
| Second growth step | |||||||
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | |
| Atypical | + | - | - | ++ | + | - | ++ |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | ++ | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | ++ | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | ++ | |