| Literature DB >> 28959222 |
Peter E Keller1,2, Rasmus König2, Giacomo Novembre3.
Abstract
Human interaction through music is a vital part of social life across cultures. Influential accounts of the evolutionary origins of music favor cooperative functions related to social cohesion or competitive functions linked to sexual selection. However, work on non-human "chorusing" displays, as produced by congregations of male insects and frogs to attract female mates, suggests that cooperative and competitive functions may coexist. In such chorusing, rhythmic coordination between signalers, which maximizes the salience of the collective broadcast, can arise through competitive mechanisms by which individual males jam rival signals. Here, we show that mixtures of cooperative and competitive behavior also occur in human music. Acoustic analyses of the renowned St. Thomas Choir revealed that, in the presence of female listeners, boys with the deepest voices enhance vocal brilliance and carrying power by boosting high spectral energy. This vocal enhancement may reflect sexually mature males competing for female attention in a covert manner that does not undermine collaborative musical goals. The evolutionary benefits of music may thus lie in its aptness as a medium for balancing sexually motivated behavior and group cohesion.Entities:
Keywords: evolution; music; non-verbal communication; singer's formant; vocal expression
Year: 2017 PMID: 28959222 PMCID: PMC5603663 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01559
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Effect of female presence on spectral energy in male voices singing in chorus. (A) Time-averaged spectra for choir voice sections singing with adolescent females present in the audience. Output of the Terhardt outer ear model (see Section Spectral Energy) is shown for audio signal inputs at frequencies up to 4,000 Hz in sopranos, altos, tenors, and basses. Audio was recorded with individual head-worn microphones as the choir performed two distinctive pieces. Mean spectral magnitude is shown for each voice section (4 singers per section), averaged across the two pieces. There is a relatively high peak in energy in the singer's formant region (2,500–3,500 Hz) for basses. (B) Average spectra for voices when singing the same pieces to a male audience with females absent. The energy peak in basses in the singer's formant region is weaker than when females were present. (C) The difference between spectral magnitudes when females were present vs. absent, highlighting the singer's formant increase in basses.
Figure 2Effects of female presence on spectral energy (based on audio signals) in the voices of individual male singers for two distinctive pieces of choir music. (A) Proportion of energy in the singer's formant region for individual singers in each voice section for three performances of each piece, a chorale (left) requiring rhythmic synchrony between choir sections and a fugue (right) requiring rhythmic independence between sections. Performance 1 was sung to the male audience, performance 2 to the audience with additional females, and performance 3 to the male audience again. Separate plots are shown for basses (blue circles), tenors (green squares), altos (black diamonds), and sopranos (red triangles). For both pieces, there is an increase in energy from performance 1 to 2 (when females present), followed by a decrease in performance 3, for each of the four basses, but no such consistent effect in other voice sections. (B) Proportion of total energy in the singer's formant region for each voice part (averaged across individual singers and pieces) when females were present vs. absent. Proportion of energy is higher when females were present than absent only in basses (female presence × voice type interaction, p = 0.003; asterisk indicates p = 0.016 for simple effect of female presence for basses only). Error bars are 95% confidence intervals based on within-participants s.e.m. (bars occluded by data marker symbols for sopranos and altos).
Measures of sound intensity (root mean square of amplitude profile), global tempo (bpm), local tempo variability (SD of onsets in tempo map), median asynchrony (in ms, relative to note onsets in mixed full choir file), and SD of asynchronies (ms) computed from individual audio files for three performances (females present in audience for performance 2) of two pieces (chorale and fugue).
| Sound intensity | Soprano | 0.249 | (0.056) | 0.231 | (0.045) | 0.246 | (0.057) | 0.242 | (0.051) | 0.242 | (0.047) | 0.258 | (0.056) |
| Alto | 0.207 | (0.024) | 0.171 | (0.017) | 0.171 | (0.018) | 0.255 | (0.017) | 0.237 | (0.009) | 0.226 | (0.009) | |
| Tenor | 0.184 | (0.019) | 0.180 | (0.019) | 0.169 | (0.015) | 0.254 | (0.019) | 0.256 | (0.018) | 0.248 | (0.017) | |
| Bass | 0.106 | (0.009) | 0.117 | (0.015) | 0.106 | (0.010) | 0.152 | (0.014) | 0.179 | (0.025) | 0.163 | (0.018) | |
| Global tempo | Soprano | 83.84 | (1.70) | 80.76 | (1.52) | 84.98 | (1.23) | 161.40 | (1.86) | 162.51 | (0.51) | 161.98 | (0.48) |
| Alto | 77.66 | (0.85) | 81.21 | (1.29) | 81.00 | (2.68) | 158.91 | (0.98) | 160.85 | (0.92) | 160.05 | (1.20) | |
| Tenor | 75.74 | (2.47) | 77.98 | (0.81) | 81.59 | (1.31) | 158.75 | (1.62) | 160.74 | (0.72) | 158.00 | (1.80) | |
| Bass | 81.97 | (2.24) | 78.31 | (1.43) | 82.22 | (2.90) | 160.32 | (0.58) | 163.63 | (0.88) | 162.23 | (1.06) | |
| Local tempo | Soprano | 6.46 | (0.94) | 7.78 | (1.87) | 4.90 | (1.13) | 10.33 | (3.14) | 6.17 | (1.55) | 9.23 | (2.24) |
| Alto | 20.20 | (6.89) | 10.14 | (2.70) | 10.58 | (4.20) | 24.27 | (10.10) | 19.16 | (6.99) | 13.00 | (1.70) | |
| Tenor | 6.23 | (2.04) | 10.34 | (1.97) | 10.89 | (2.25) | 7.61 | (2.20) | 9.14 | (3.61) | 9.55 | (1.96) | |
| Bass | 4.02 | (0.16) | 14.61 | (11.19) | 9.29 | (2.33) | 13.91 | (5.43) | 8.98 | (2.59) | 10.33 | (5.30) | |
| Median asynchrony | Soprano | −5.02 | (4.48) | −0.70 | (4.69) | −7.15 | (6.79) | −3.26 | (9.48) | −2.78 | (8.81) | −7.07 | (8.45) |
| Alto | −4.75 | (3.96) | −3.21 | (4.60) | 2.30 | (2.43) | −5.84 | (3.11) | −3.94 | (2.52) | −1.88 | (3.08) | |
| Tenor | 7.96 | (4.12) | −0.11 | (2.72) | 0.80 | (3.00) | 0.79 | (5.75) | −0.77 | (4.78) | −1.64 | (5.06) | |
| Bass | 4.15 | (5.58) | 8.19 | (1.83) | 1.44 | (2.59) | −0.96 | (4.34) | 4.01 | (4.31) | −0.89 | (4.28) | |
| SD of asynchronies | Soprano | 61.23 | (2.55) | 59.01 | (3.05) | 57.03 | (2.42) | 45.81 | (0.67) | 46.75 | (1.69) | 45.11 | (1.14) |
| Alto | 59.14 | (1.46) | 57.24 | (1.45) | 56.49 | (0.69) | 47.70 | (1.66) | 46.09 | (1.36) | 48.23 | (1.69) | |
| Tenor | 59.48 | (1.82) | 58.58 | (0.95) | 61.42 | (1.96) | 48.89 | (1.31) | 49.75 | (1.61) | 48.45 | (1.84) | |
| Bass | 59.15 | (2.79) | 60.60 | (1.30) | 58.19 | (2.10) | 53.15 | (0.89) | 51.13 | (1.40) | 49.97 | (1.31) | |
See Data Analysis for details. Values averaged across the four singers in each voice section (soprano, alto, tenor, and bass; s.e.m. in parentheses).