Literature DB >> 28958504

Rilotumumab plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine as first-line therapy in advanced MET-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (RILOMET-1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Daniel V T Catenacci1, Niall C Tebbutt2, Irina Davidenko3, André M Murad4, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran5, David H Ilson6, Sergei Tjulandin7, Evengy Gotovkin8, Boguslawa Karaszewska9, Igor Bondarenko10, Mohamedtaki A Tejani11, Anghel A Udrea12, Mustapha Tehfe13, Ferdinando De Vita14, Cheryl Turkington15, Rui Tang16, Agnes Ang16, Yilong Zhang16, Tien Hoang16, Roger Sidhu16, David Cunningham17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rilotumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets the ligand of the MET receptor, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). We aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of rilotumumab combined with epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine, and to assess potential biomarkers, in patients with advanced MET-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study was done at 152 centres in 27 countries. We recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, MET-positive tumours (≥25% of tumour cells with membrane staining of ≥1+ staining intensity), and evaluable disease, who had not received previous systemic therapy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computerised voice response system to receive rilotumumab 15 mg/kg intravenously or placebo in combination with open-label chemotherapy (epirubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously; cisplatin 60 mg/m2 intravenously; capecitabine 625 mg/m2 orally twice daily) in 21-day cycles for up to ten cycles. After completion of chemotherapy, patients continued to receive rilotumumab or placebo monotherapy until disease progression, intolerability, withdrawal of consent, or study termination. Randomisation was stratified by disease extent and ECOG performance status. Both patients and physicians were masked to study treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. We report the final analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01697072.
FINDINGS: Between Nov 7, 2012, and Nov 21, 2014, 609 patients were randomly assigned to rilotumumab plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (rilotumumab group; n=304) or placebo plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (placebo group; n=305). Study treatment was stopped early after an independent data monitoring committee found a higher number of deaths in the rilotumumab group than in the placebo group; all patients in the rilotumumab group subsequently discontinued all study treatment. Median follow-up was 7·7 months (IQR 3·6-12·0) for patients in the rilotumumab group and 9·4 months (5·3-13·1) for patients in the placebo group. Median overall survival was 8·8 months (95% CI 7·7-10·2) in the rilotumumab group compared with 10·7 months (9·6-12·4) in the placebo group (stratified hazard ratio 1·34, 95% CI 1·10-1·63; p=0·003). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the rilotumumab and placebo groups were neutropenia (86 [29%] of 298 patients vs 97 [32%] of 299 patients), anaemia (37 [12%] vs 43 [14%]), and fatigue (30 [10%] vs 35 [12%]). The frequency of serious adverse events was similar in the rilotumumab and placebo groups (142 [48%] vs 149 [50%]). More deaths due to adverse events occurred in the rilotumumab group than the placebo group (42 [14%] vs 31 [10%]). In the rilotumumab group, 33 (11%) of 298 patients had fatal adverse events due to disease progression, and nine (3%) had fatal events not due to disease progression. In the placebo group, 23 (8%) of 299 patients had fatal adverse events due to disease progression, and eight (3%) had fatal events not due to disease progression.
INTERPRETATION: Ligand-blocking inhibition of the MET pathway with rilotumumab is not effective in improving clinical outcomes in patients with MET-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. FUNDING: Amgen.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28958504      PMCID: PMC5898242          DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30566-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  29 in total

1.  Investigation of nuclear c-MYC oncoprotein expression in human hematopoiesis: suitability of a rapid and reliable semiquantitative evaluation system.

Authors:  R Greil; B Fasching; A Weger; P Loidl
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.662

2.  MET amplification identifies a small and aggressive subgroup of esophagogastric adenocarcinoma with evidence of responsiveness to crizotinib.

Authors:  Jochen K Lennerz; Eunice L Kwak; Allison Ackerman; Michael Michael; Stephen B Fox; Kristin Bergethon; Gregory Y Lauwers; James G Christensen; Keith D Wilner; Daniel A Haber; Ravi Salgia; Yung-Jue Bang; Jeffrey W Clark; Benjamin J Solomon; A John Iafrate
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Fully human monoclonal antibodies to hepatocyte growth factor with therapeutic potential against hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met-dependent human tumors.

Authors:  Teresa Burgess; Angela Coxon; Susanne Meyer; Jan Sun; Karen Rex; Trace Tsuruda; Qing Chen; Shu-Yin Ho; Luke Li; Stephen Kaufman; Kevin McDorman; Russell C Cattley; Jilin Sun; Gary Elliott; Ke Zhang; Xiao Feng; Xiao-Chi Jia; Larry Green; Robert Radinsky; Richard Kendall
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer.

Authors:  David Cunningham; Naureen Starling; Sheela Rao; Timothy Iveson; Marianne Nicolson; Fareeda Coxon; Gary Middleton; Francis Daniel; Jacqueline Oates; Andrew Richard Norman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The overexpression of c-met as a prognostic indicator for gastric carcinoma compared to p53 and p21 nuclear accumulation.

Authors:  Uta Drebber; Stephan E Baldus; Britt Nolden; Guido Grass; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Hans P Dienes; Arnulf H Hölscher; Stefan P Mönig
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of AMG 102, a fully human hepatocyte growth factor-neutralizing monoclonal antibody, in a first-in-human study of patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Michael S Gordon; Christopher S Sweeney; David S Mendelson; S Gail Eckhardt; Abraham Anderson; Darrin M Beaupre; Daniel Branstetter; Teresa L Burgess; Angela Coxon; Hongjie Deng; Paula Kaplan-Lefko; Ian M Leitch; Kelly S Oliner; Lucy Yan; Min Zhu; Lia Gore
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  MET: a promising anticancer therapeutic target.

Authors:  Solange Peters; Alex A Adjei
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  A "quickscore" method for immunohistochemical semiquantitation: validation for oestrogen receptor in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  S Detre; G Saclani Jotti; M Dowsett
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Absolute quantitation of Met using mass spectrometry for clinical application: assay precision, stability, and correlation with MET gene amplification in FFPE tumor tissue.

Authors:  Daniel V T Catenacci; Wei-Li Liao; Sheeno Thyparambil; Les Henderson; Peng Xu; Lei Zhao; Brittany Rambo; John Hart; Shu-Yuan Xiao; Kathleen Bengali; Jamar Uzzell; Marlene Darfler; David B Krizman; Fabiola Cecchi; Donald P Bottaro; Theodore Karrison; Timothy D Veenstra; Todd Hembrough; Jon Burrows
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  MET tyrosine kinase receptor expression and amplification as prognostic biomarkers of survival in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel V T Catenacci; Agnes Ang; Wei-Li Liao; Jing Shen; Emily O'Day; Robert D Loberg; Fabiola Cecchi; Todd Hembrough; Annamaria Ruzzo; Francesco Graziano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  103 in total

1.  Cooperative Effect of Oncogenic MET and PIK3CA in an HGF-Dominant Environment in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shuying Liu; Shunqiang Li; Bailiang Wang; Wenbin Liu; Mihai Gagea; Huiqin Chen; Joohyuk Sohn; Napa Parinyanitikul; Tina Primeau; Kim-Anh Do; George F Vande Woude; John Mendelsohn; Naoto T Ueno; Gordon B Mills; Debu Tripathy; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 2.  PET Imaging of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Cancer.

Authors:  Weijun Wei; Dalong Ni; Emily B Ehlerding; Quan-Yong Luo; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 3.  Current advances of targeting HGF/c-Met pathway in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Aristomenis Anestis; Ilianna Zoi; Michalis V Karamouzis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-06

4.  C7 peptide inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis by targeting the HGF/c-Met signaling pathway.

Authors:  Mingyuan Zhao; Yinhe Wang; Yan Liu; Wanchun Zhang; Yakun Liu; Xiaoming Yang; Yunxia Cao; Siying Wang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 5.  Comprehensive review of targeted therapy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yuan-Hong Xie; Ying-Xuan Chen; Jing-Yuan Fang
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-03-20

6.  Revisiting MET: Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic, MET-Amplified Esophagogastric Cancers.

Authors:  Surendra Pal Chaudhary; Eunice L Kwak; Jeffrey W Clark; Theodore S Hong; Katie L Hwang; Jochen K Lennerz; Ryan B Corcoran; Rebecca S Heist; Andrea L Russo; Aparna Parikh; Darrell R Borger; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Jason E Faris; Janet E Murphy; Christopher G Azzoli; Eric J Roeland; Lipika Goyal; Jill Allen; John T Mullen; David P Ryan; A John Iafrate; Samuel J Klempner
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-09-12

7.  Phase I Study of AMG 337, a Highly Selective Small-molecule MET Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

Authors:  David S Hong; Patricia LoRusso; Omid Hamid; Filip Janku; Muaiad Kittaneh; Daniel V T Catenacci; Emily Chan; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Shirish M Gadgeel; Robert D Loberg; Benny M Amore; Yuying C Hwang; Rui Tang; Gataree Ngarmchamnanrith; Eunice L Kwak
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Surgical Outcome and Long-Term Survival of Conversion Surgery for Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Guo-Ming Chen; Shu-Qiang Yuan; Run-Cong Nie; Tian-Qi Luo; Kai-Ming Jiang; Cheng-Cai Liang; Yuan-Fang Li; De-Yao Zhang; Jie-Hai Yu; Fan Hou; Yun Wang; Ying-Bo Chen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Targeted Therapies for Targeted Populations: Anti-EGFR Treatment for EGFR-Amplified Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Steven B Maron; Lindsay Alpert; Heewon A Kwak; Samantha Lomnicki; Leah Chase; David Xu; Emily O'Day; Rebecca J Nagy; Richard B Lanman; Fabiola Cecchi; Todd Hembrough; Alexa Schrock; John Hart; Shu-Yuan Xiao; Namrata Setia; Daniel V T Catenacci
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 10.  Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ankur K Nagaraja; Osamu Kikuchi; Adam J Bass
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 39.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.