Daniel V T Catenacci1, Niall C Tebbutt2, Irina Davidenko3, André M Murad4, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran5, David H Ilson6, Sergei Tjulandin7, Evengy Gotovkin8, Boguslawa Karaszewska9, Igor Bondarenko10, Mohamedtaki A Tejani11, Anghel A Udrea12, Mustapha Tehfe13, Ferdinando De Vita14, Cheryl Turkington15, Rui Tang16, Agnes Ang16, Yilong Zhang16, Tien Hoang16, Roger Sidhu16, David Cunningham17. 1. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 2. Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia. 3. State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Clinical Oncology Dispensary #1, Krasnodar Region Ministry of Healthcare, Krasnodar, Russia. 4. Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Horizonte, Brazil. 5. Institute of Clinical Cancer Research, Krankenhaus Nordwest, University Cancer Center, Frankfurt, Germany. 6. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 7. Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia. 8. Regional Budgetary Institution of Public Health Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russia. 9. Przychodnia Lekarska Komed Oddzial Jednego Dnia, Konin, Poland. 10. Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy, City Multifield Clinical Hospital 4, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine. 11. University of Rochester Medical Center, James P Wilmot Cancer Center, Rochester, NY, USA. 12. SC Medisprof SRL, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 13. Centre Hospitalier de L'Universite de Montreal Notre-Dame, Montreal, QC, Canada. 14. Second University of Naples School of Medicine, Naples, Italy. 15. Amgen, Cambridge, UK. 16. Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. 17. Royal Marsden Hospital, London and Surrey, UK. Electronic address: David.Cunningham@rmh.nhs.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Rilotumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets the ligand of the MET receptor, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). We aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of rilotumumab combined with epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine, and to assess potential biomarkers, in patients with advanced MET-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study was done at 152 centres in 27 countries. We recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, MET-positive tumours (≥25% of tumour cells with membrane staining of ≥1+ staining intensity), and evaluable disease, who had not received previous systemic therapy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computerised voice response system to receive rilotumumab 15 mg/kg intravenously or placebo in combination with open-label chemotherapy (epirubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously; cisplatin 60 mg/m2 intravenously; capecitabine 625 mg/m2 orally twice daily) in 21-day cycles for up to ten cycles. After completion of chemotherapy, patients continued to receive rilotumumab or placebo monotherapy until disease progression, intolerability, withdrawal of consent, or study termination. Randomisation was stratified by disease extent and ECOG performance status. Both patients and physicians were masked to study treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. We report the final analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01697072. FINDINGS:Between Nov 7, 2012, and Nov 21, 2014, 609 patients were randomly assigned to rilotumumab plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (rilotumumab group; n=304) or placebo plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (placebo group; n=305). Study treatment was stopped early after an independent data monitoring committee found a higher number of deaths in the rilotumumab group than in the placebo group; all patients in the rilotumumab group subsequently discontinued all study treatment. Median follow-up was 7·7 months (IQR 3·6-12·0) for patients in the rilotumumab group and 9·4 months (5·3-13·1) for patients in the placebo group. Median overall survival was 8·8 months (95% CI 7·7-10·2) in the rilotumumab group compared with 10·7 months (9·6-12·4) in the placebo group (stratified hazard ratio 1·34, 95% CI 1·10-1·63; p=0·003). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the rilotumumab and placebo groups were neutropenia (86 [29%] of 298 patients vs 97 [32%] of 299 patients), anaemia (37 [12%] vs 43 [14%]), and fatigue (30 [10%] vs 35 [12%]). The frequency of serious adverse events was similar in the rilotumumab and placebo groups (142 [48%] vs 149 [50%]). More deaths due to adverse events occurred in the rilotumumab group than the placebo group (42 [14%] vs 31 [10%]). In the rilotumumab group, 33 (11%) of 298 patients had fatal adverse events due to disease progression, and nine (3%) had fatal events not due to disease progression. In the placebo group, 23 (8%) of 299 patients had fatal adverse events due to disease progression, and eight (3%) had fatal events not due to disease progression. INTERPRETATION: Ligand-blocking inhibition of the MET pathway with rilotumumab is not effective in improving clinical outcomes in patients with MET-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. FUNDING: Amgen.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Rilotumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets the ligand of the MET receptor, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). We aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of rilotumumab combined with epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine, and to assess potential biomarkers, in patients with advanced MET-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study was done at 152 centres in 27 countries. We recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, MET-positive tumours (≥25% of tumour cells with membrane staining of ≥1+ staining intensity), and evaluable disease, who had not received previous systemic therapy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computerised voice response system to receive rilotumumab 15 mg/kg intravenously or placebo in combination with open-label chemotherapy (epirubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously; cisplatin 60 mg/m2 intravenously; capecitabine 625 mg/m2 orally twice daily) in 21-day cycles for up to ten cycles. After completion of chemotherapy, patients continued to receive rilotumumab or placebo monotherapy until disease progression, intolerability, withdrawal of consent, or study termination. Randomisation was stratified by disease extent and ECOG performance status. Both patients and physicians were masked to study treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. We report the final analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01697072. FINDINGS: Between Nov 7, 2012, and Nov 21, 2014, 609 patients were randomly assigned to rilotumumab plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (rilotumumab group; n=304) or placebo plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (placebo group; n=305). Study treatment was stopped early after an independent data monitoring committee found a higher number of deaths in the rilotumumab group than in the placebo group; all patients in the rilotumumab group subsequently discontinued all study treatment. Median follow-up was 7·7 months (IQR 3·6-12·0) for patients in the rilotumumab group and 9·4 months (5·3-13·1) for patients in the placebo group. Median overall survival was 8·8 months (95% CI 7·7-10·2) in the rilotumumab group compared with 10·7 months (9·6-12·4) in the placebo group (stratified hazard ratio 1·34, 95% CI 1·10-1·63; p=0·003). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the rilotumumab and placebo groups were neutropenia (86 [29%] of 298 patients vs 97 [32%] of 299 patients), anaemia (37 [12%] vs 43 [14%]), and fatigue (30 [10%] vs 35 [12%]). The frequency of serious adverse events was similar in the rilotumumab and placebo groups (142 [48%] vs 149 [50%]). More deaths due to adverse events occurred in the rilotumumab group than the placebo group (42 [14%] vs 31 [10%]). In the rilotumumab group, 33 (11%) of 298 patients had fatal adverse events due to disease progression, and nine (3%) had fatal events not due to disease progression. In the placebo group, 23 (8%) of 299 patients had fatal adverse events due to disease progression, and eight (3%) had fatal events not due to disease progression. INTERPRETATION: Ligand-blocking inhibition of the MET pathway with rilotumumab is not effective in improving clinical outcomes in patients with MET-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. FUNDING: Amgen.
Authors: Jochen K Lennerz; Eunice L Kwak; Allison Ackerman; Michael Michael; Stephen B Fox; Kristin Bergethon; Gregory Y Lauwers; James G Christensen; Keith D Wilner; Daniel A Haber; Ravi Salgia; Yung-Jue Bang; Jeffrey W Clark; Benjamin J Solomon; A John Iafrate Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-10-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Teresa Burgess; Angela Coxon; Susanne Meyer; Jan Sun; Karen Rex; Trace Tsuruda; Qing Chen; Shu-Yin Ho; Luke Li; Stephen Kaufman; Kevin McDorman; Russell C Cattley; Jilin Sun; Gary Elliott; Ke Zhang; Xiao Feng; Xiao-Chi Jia; Larry Green; Robert Radinsky; Richard Kendall Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: David Cunningham; Naureen Starling; Sheela Rao; Timothy Iveson; Marianne Nicolson; Fareeda Coxon; Gary Middleton; Francis Daniel; Jacqueline Oates; Andrew Richard Norman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-01-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Uta Drebber; Stephan E Baldus; Britt Nolden; Guido Grass; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Hans P Dienes; Arnulf H Hölscher; Stefan P Mönig Journal: Oncol Rep Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.906
Authors: Michael S Gordon; Christopher S Sweeney; David S Mendelson; S Gail Eckhardt; Abraham Anderson; Darrin M Beaupre; Daniel Branstetter; Teresa L Burgess; Angela Coxon; Hongjie Deng; Paula Kaplan-Lefko; Ian M Leitch; Kelly S Oliner; Lucy Yan; Min Zhu; Lia Gore Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Daniel V T Catenacci; Wei-Li Liao; Sheeno Thyparambil; Les Henderson; Peng Xu; Lei Zhao; Brittany Rambo; John Hart; Shu-Yuan Xiao; Kathleen Bengali; Jamar Uzzell; Marlene Darfler; David B Krizman; Fabiola Cecchi; Donald P Bottaro; Theodore Karrison; Timothy D Veenstra; Todd Hembrough; Jon Burrows Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Daniel V T Catenacci; Agnes Ang; Wei-Li Liao; Jing Shen; Emily O'Day; Robert D Loberg; Fabiola Cecchi; Todd Hembrough; Annamaria Ruzzo; Francesco Graziano Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Shuying Liu; Shunqiang Li; Bailiang Wang; Wenbin Liu; Mihai Gagea; Huiqin Chen; Joohyuk Sohn; Napa Parinyanitikul; Tina Primeau; Kim-Anh Do; George F Vande Woude; John Mendelsohn; Naoto T Ueno; Gordon B Mills; Debu Tripathy; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Surendra Pal Chaudhary; Eunice L Kwak; Jeffrey W Clark; Theodore S Hong; Katie L Hwang; Jochen K Lennerz; Ryan B Corcoran; Rebecca S Heist; Andrea L Russo; Aparna Parikh; Darrell R Borger; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Jason E Faris; Janet E Murphy; Christopher G Azzoli; Eric J Roeland; Lipika Goyal; Jill Allen; John T Mullen; David P Ryan; A John Iafrate; Samuel J Klempner Journal: Oncologist Date: 2020-09-12
Authors: David S Hong; Patricia LoRusso; Omid Hamid; Filip Janku; Muaiad Kittaneh; Daniel V T Catenacci; Emily Chan; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Shirish M Gadgeel; Robert D Loberg; Benny M Amore; Yuying C Hwang; Rui Tang; Gataree Ngarmchamnanrith; Eunice L Kwak Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Steven B Maron; Lindsay Alpert; Heewon A Kwak; Samantha Lomnicki; Leah Chase; David Xu; Emily O'Day; Rebecca J Nagy; Richard B Lanman; Fabiola Cecchi; Todd Hembrough; Alexa Schrock; John Hart; Shu-Yuan Xiao; Namrata Setia; Daniel V T Catenacci Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 39.397