Literature DB >> 20068101

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of AMG 102, a fully human hepatocyte growth factor-neutralizing monoclonal antibody, in a first-in-human study of patients with advanced solid tumors.

Michael S Gordon1, Christopher S Sweeney, David S Mendelson, S Gail Eckhardt, Abraham Anderson, Darrin M Beaupre, Daniel Branstetter, Teresa L Burgess, Angela Coxon, Hongjie Deng, Paula Kaplan-Lefko, Ian M Leitch, Kelly S Oliner, Lucy Yan, Min Zhu, Lia Gore.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims were to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, maximum tolerated dose, and antitumor activity of AMG 102, a fully human hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF)-neutralizing monoclonal antibody, in patients with solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Patients (N = 40) with refractory advanced solid tumors were enrolled into six sequential dose-escalation cohorts (0.5, 1, 3, 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg AMG 102 i.v. every 2 weeks) and a dose-expansion cohort (20 mg/kg AMG 102 every 2 weeks). Safety, anti-AMG 102 antibody formation, pharmacokinetics, tumor response, and exploratory biomarkers were assessed.
RESULTS: AMG 102 was well tolerated up to the planned maximum dose of 20 mg/kg, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Treatment-related adverse events were generally mild and included fatigue (13%), constipation (8%), nausea (8%), vomiting (5%), anorexia (5%), myalgia (5%), and hypertension (5%). Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities: one patient (0.5 mg/kg cohort) experienced grade 3 hypoxia and grade 3 dyspnea and one patient (1 mg/kg cohort) experienced grade 3 upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. No anti-AMG 102 antibodies were detected, and AMG 102 had linear pharmacokinetics within the dose range investigated. Sixteen of 23 (70%) evaluable patients had a best response of stable disease with progression-free survival ranging from 7.9 to 40 weeks. Circulating levels of the biomarker HGF/SF (bound and unbound) increased in a dose-dependent manner, whereas soluble c-Met concentrations were generally similar across doses.
CONCLUSIONS: AMG 102 is safe and well tolerated, has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, and will be further investigated as a monotherapy and in combination with other agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20068101     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  80 in total

Review 1.  Radioimmunotherapy of solid tumors: searching for the right target.

Authors:  Hong Song; George Sgouros
Journal:  Curr Drug Deliv       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Design considerations for dose-expansion cohorts in phase I trials.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Promise and challenges on the horizon of MET-targeted cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Yu-Wen Zhang
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-05-26

4.  Rilotumumab plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine as first-line therapy in advanced MET-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (RILOMET-1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Daniel V T Catenacci; Niall C Tebbutt; Irina Davidenko; André M Murad; Salah-Eddin Al-Batran; David H Ilson; Sergei Tjulandin; Evengy Gotovkin; Boguslawa Karaszewska; Igor Bondarenko; Mohamedtaki A Tejani; Anghel A Udrea; Mustapha Tehfe; Ferdinando De Vita; Cheryl Turkington; Rui Tang; Agnes Ang; Yilong Zhang; Tien Hoang; Roger Sidhu; David Cunningham
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Initial clinical sensitivity and acquired resistance to MET inhibition in MET-mutated papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jennifer R Diamond; Ravi Salgia; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Rajani Kanteti; Patricia M LoRusso; Jeffrey W Clark; Ling-Guo Xu; Keith Wilner; S Gail Eckhardt; Keith A Ching; Maruja E Lira; Eric F P M Schoenmakers; James G Christensen; D Ross Camidge
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Targeted approach to metastatic colorectal cancer: what comes beyond epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies and bevacizumab?

Authors:  Teresa Troiani; Erika Martinelli; Floriana Morgillo; Anna Capasso; Anna Nappi; Vincenzo Sforza; Fortunato Ciardiello
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rilotumumab: a decade of experience in preclinical and clinical cancer research.

Authors:  Y Zhang; S Doshi; M Zhu
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Assessment of pharmacokinetic interaction between rilotumumab and epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) in a Phase 3 study in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yilong Zhang; Mita Kuchimanchi; Min Zhu; Sameer Doshi; Tien Hoang; Sreeneeranj Kasichayanula
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Clinical and prognostic value of MET gene copy number gain and chromosome 7 polysomy in primary colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  An Na Seo; Kyoung Un Park; Gheeyoung Choe; Woo Ho Kim; Duck-Woo Kim; Sung-Bum Kang; Hye Seung Lee
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-07-10

10.  Radiosensitization of glioma cells by modulation of Met signalling with the hepatocyte growth factor neutralizing antibody, AMG102.

Authors:  Ian M Buchanan; Tamalee Scott; Anita T Tandle; William E Burgan; Teresa L Burgess; Philip J Tofilon; Kevin Camphausen
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 5.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.