Literature DB >> 28958416

The functional effects of prior motion imagery and motion perception.

Shuai Chang1, Joel Pearson2.   

Abstract

The functional sensory effects and commonalties between mental imagery of different visual features such as color, form or motion remains largely unknown. Mental imagery of static visual features, including color and orientation, can have a facilitative, priming effect on subsequent perception. However, whether motion imagery can have a similar effect remains unknown. Here we used the binocular rivalry method as a measure of motion mental imagery. After imagining or viewing motion of a particular direction, participants were required to report the dominant motion direction in a brief motion rivalry stimulus. We found that motion imagery can have a facilitative priming effect on subsequent motion rivalry perception, and this effect can be attenuated by concurrent expanding and contracting perceptual motion, but not by static or flickering uniform luminance. Unlike color or orientation imagery, the effect of motion imagery on subsequent rivalry was location independent. We also observed this facilitative priming effect with prior low-contrast perceptual motion, but prior high-contrast motion induced a suppressive effect. Simultaneous imagery and perceptual motion in opposite directions induced priming, while congruent directions did not. Counter to prior findings, these results suggest motion imagery can have a priming effect on perception and that the rivalry method can be used to assess visual motion imagery. These results provide evidence for visual imagery as a multi-feature structure.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binocular rivalry; Mental imagery; Motion imagery; Motion perception; Priming

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28958416     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  5 in total

1.  The pupillary light response as a physiological index of aphantasia, sensory and phenomenological imagery strength.

Authors:  Lachlan Kay; Rebecca Keogh; Thomas Andrillon; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 2.  The human imagination: the cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery.

Authors:  Joel Pearson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  Why do imagery and perception look and feel so different?

Authors:  Roger Koenig-Robert; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Behavioral and oculomotor evidence for visual simulation of object movement.

Authors:  Aarit Ahuja; David L Sheinberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Expectations affect the perception of material properties.

Authors:  Lorilei M Alley; Alexandra C Schmid; Katja Doerschner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.