| Literature DB >> 28956821 |
Chris Steffi1, Zhilong Shi2, Chee Hoe Kong3, Wilson Wang4.
Abstract
To improve orthopedic implant fixation and reduce post-operative complications, osteogenic molecules are delivered locally by immobilizing them on the surface of implants, which will modulate the biology of cell attachment and differentiation on the implant surface.Entities:
Keywords: estradiol; implants; osteoblasts and osteoclasts; osteoporosis; polydopamine
Year: 2017 PMID: 28956821 PMCID: PMC5748552 DOI: 10.3390/jfb8040045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Funct Biomater ISSN: 2079-4983
Figure 1XPS wide-scan spectra of substrates portray E2 immobilization on the surface. (A) Ti; (B) Ti-pDOP; (C) Ti-pDOP-E2-0.1 µg; (D) Ti-pDOP-E2-1 µg and (E) Ti-pDOP-E2-10 µg. Ti (A) displays signals for O 1s, Ti 2p and C1s, (B) Ti-pDOP depicts an additional peak of N 1s peak, whereas after estradiol immobilization (C–E) the signals for N 1s were reduced in a dose dependent manner depicting immobilization of E2 on the surface.
Elemental Composition * at the surface as determined by XPS.
| Substrates | O% | Ti% | N% | C% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ti | 47.89 | 38.29 | 1.44 | 38.29 |
| Ti-pDOP | 19.20 | 0.70 | 7.27 | 72.84 |
| Ti-pDOP-E2-0.1 µg | 20 | 0.66 | 6.06 | 73.22 |
| Ti-pDOP-E2-1 µg | 18.21 | 0.27 | 5.83 | 75.69 |
| Ti-pDOP-E2-10 µg | 18.86 | 0.42 | 4.65 | 76.07 |
* Percentages calculated based on the Ti, O, N, and C contents only.
Figure 2Fluorescence images of substrates before and after modifying with E2. The images of the substrates (A) Ti; (B) Ti-pDOP; (C) Ti-pDOP-E2-0.1 µg; (D) Ti-pDOP-E2-1 µg and (E) Ti-pDOP-E2-10 µg were obtained by confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) after staining for the immobilized estradiol with anti-rabbit IgG–FITC. Green fluorescence was observed on (C) Ti-pDOP-E2-0.1 µg; (D) Ti-pDOP-E2-1 µg and (E) Ti-pDOP-E2-10 µg as compared to controls (A) Ti; (B) Ti-pDOP. The fluorescence intensity increased with increasing concentrations of immobilized estradiol.
Surface density of immobilized E2 on titanium surface.
| Substrates | Total Amount of E2 in Loading Solution (μg) | Amount of E2 in the Wash Solution (μg) | Surface Density of Loaded E2 (μg/cm2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ti-pDOP-E2-0.1 µg | 0.1 | 0.046 ± 0.1 | 0.054 ± 0.1 |
| Ti-pDOP-E2-1 µg | 1 | 0.28 ± 0.11 | 0.72 ± 0.11 |
| Ti-pDOP-E2-10 µg | 10 | 1.85 ± 0.49 | 8.15 ± 0.49 |
Figure 3SEM images of substrates before and after the modification with E2. (A) Ti; (B) Ti-pDOP, (C) Ti-pDOP-E2-10 µg (Scale bar = 20 µm). Large crystals of estradiol were observed on (C) Ti-pDOP-E2-10 µg.
Figure 4The E2 release profile of E2-immobilized substrates. E2 release was studied using ELISA after incubating E2-immobilized substrates in PBS at 37 °C. After 24 h, 64% of estradiol was released from Ti-pDOP-E2-0.1 µg, 22% of E2 was released from Ti-pDOP-E2-1 µg and 31% from Ti-pDOP-E2-10 µg.
Figure 5Cell viability and proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells on substrates before and after the modification with E2. MTT assay was performed at day 1 and day 3 of MC3T3-E1 cell culture on different substrates. Cell proliferation was reduced for the cells cultured on Ti-pDOP-E2-10 µg as compared to Ti (p < 0.05)
Figure 6ALP activity (A) and calcium deposition (B) of osteoblasts on the substrates before and after the modification with E2. (A) ALP activity of MC3T3-E1 cells after 1 week culture on different substrates. Estradiol immobilized substrates such as Ti-pDOP-E2-0.1 µg, Ti-pDOP-E2-1 µg and Ti-pDOP-E2-10 µg augmented ALP activity and statistical difference is denoted as (*) p < 0.05 versus Ti and (#) is p < 0.05 versus Ti-pDOP. (**) and (##) denotes p < 0.01. (B) Alizarin red S staining after 4-week culture of MC3T3-E1 cells on (B1) Ti, (B2) Ti-pDOP, (B3) Ti-pDOP-E2-0.1 µg, (B4) Ti-pDOP-E2-1 µg and (B5) Ti-pDOP-E2-10 µg. Scale bar = 200 µm. (B6) Quantification of alizarin red S stain. Higher alizarin red S stain was observed on Ti-pDOP-E2-10 µg and the statistical significant difference is represented as (**) as compared to Ti (p < 0.01), (##) as compared to Ti-pDOP (p < 0.01), (oo) as compared to Ti-pDOP-E2-0.1 µg (p < 0.01) and (^) as compared to Ti-pDOP-E2-1 µg (p < 0.05).
Figure 7Total DNA of osteoclast on the substrates before and after surface functionalization with E2. After 5 days of culture, total DNA of osteoclast was measured in the cell lysates. Total DNA were similar on all the substrates suggesting that estradiol immobilized substrates did not decrease osteoclast DNA.
Figure 8Osteoclast morphology (A) and TRAP activity of osteoclasts (B) on the substrates before and after the modification with E2. Confocal laser scanning microscope images of osteoclasts, stained for nucleus (blue) and actin (green). Images were acquired after 5 days of osteoclast culture on (A1) Ti; (A2) Ti-pDOP; (A3) Ti-pDOP-E2-0.1 µg; (A4) Ti-pDOP-E2-1 µg and (A5) Ti-pDOP-E2-10 µg. Multinucleated osteoclast formation with discrete actin rings were observed on all the substrates. (B) TRAP activity of osteoclasts after 5 days of culture on the substrates. The TRAP activities of osteoclasts were similar on all the substrates and no reduction was observed on estradiol-modified substrates.