Literature DB >> 28956087

A compromise solution between overlapping and overlooking DSM personality disorders in Chinese psychiatric practice.

SuoYu Zhu1,2, TianHong Zhang3,4,5, ChengQing Yang1, YanYan Wei1, LiHua Xu1, JunJie Wang1, Annabelle Chow6, XiaoHua Liu1, KaiDa Jiang1, ZePing Xiao1, Hui Zhou7, JiJun Wang8,9,10,11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the overlaps between the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (DSM-5) Personality Disorders (PDs) in a high-risk clinical population and to explore a transitional model for implementing DSM-5 PDs.
METHOD: A sample population of 982 outpatients with at least one diagnosed PD was selected from 3,075 outpatients of the Shanghai Mental Health Center. The diagnostic process comprised of a personality diagnostic questionnaire and a structured clinical interview.
RESULTS: 685 (22.3%) patients were diagnosed with at least one of six PDs (antisocial, avoidant, borderline, narcissistic, obsessive-compulsive, and schizotypal) under the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders proposed in Section III of the DSM-5. Nearly 20.3% of the subjects with PD met criteria for at least two PDs (of the 685 PD patients/6 PD model). Cluster and principal component analyses suggest a transitional model for the 7 specific PD categories (among the 722 PD patients, the overlapping rate was 24.1%) will be more appropriate for PD diagnosis in China.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the simplified PD categories in the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders will reduce the overlaps in PD diagnoses in Chinese psychiatric practice, and should be preferred over the DSM-5 PD diagnostic system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; Classification; Comorbidity; Diagnosis; Personality disorder

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28956087     DOI: 10.1007/s00127-017-1444-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol        ISSN: 0933-7954            Impact factor:   4.328


  23 in total

1.  Patterns of comorbidity among DSM-III-R personality disorders.

Authors:  M G Marinangeli; G Butti; A Scinto; L Di Cicco; C Petruzzi; E Daneluzzo; A Rossi
Journal:  Psychopathology       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.944

Review 2.  The classification of personality disorders: critical review and need for rethinking.

Authors:  Assen Jablensky
Journal:  Psychopathology       Date:  2002 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 1.944

3.  Individual growth curve analysis illuminates stability and change in personality disorder features: the longitudinal study of personality disorders.

Authors:  Mark F Lenzenweger; Matthew D Johnson; John B Willett
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2004-10

4.  Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire--revised: comparison with two structured interviews.

Authors:  S E Hyler; A E Skodol; H D Kellman; J M Oldham; L Rosnick
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  The alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders.

Authors:  John M Oldham
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 6.  Culture and personality disorder: from a fragmented literature to a contextually grounded alternative.

Authors:  Andrew G Ryder; Momoka Sunohara; Laurence J Kirmayer
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.741

Review 7.  Stability and change in personality disorders.

Authors:  Leslie C Morey; Christopher J Hopwood
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 18.561

8.  The prevalence of DSM-IV personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients.

Authors:  Mark Zimmerman; Louis Rothschild; Iwona Chelminski
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Initial reliability and validity of a new retrospective measure of child abuse and neglect.

Authors:  D P Bernstein; L Fink; L Handelsman; J Foote; M Lovejoy; K Wenzel; E Sapareto; J Ruggiero
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  The need to establish diagnostic criteria for borderline personality disorder in China.

Authors:  Lanlan Wang; Zeping Xiao
Journal:  Shanghai Arch Psychiatry       Date:  2012-08
View more
  3 in total

1.  Frequency of narcissistic personality disorder in a counseling center population in China.

Authors:  XueFeng Jiang; JunJie Wang; Wei Sun; LiHua Xu; XiaoChen Tang; HuiRu Cui; YanYan Wei; Li Hui; Yi Qiao; JiJun Wang; TianHong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.630

2.  Prevalence of Comorbid Personality Disorder in Psychotic and Non-psychotic Disorders.

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Lei Zhang; Jiechun Zhang; Zhihao Ye; Ping Li; Feng Wang; Yili Cao; Shaojun Zhang; Fang Zhou; Zisheng Ai; Nan Zhao
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  Sex differences in personality disorders in a Chinese clinical population.

Authors:  HongZhen He; Mei Xu; ZhangYing Fei; Yuou Xie; XinYi Gu; HongLiang Zhu; JunJie Wang
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.435

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.