| Literature DB >> 28956003 |
Monira Pervin1, Keiko Unno1,2, Aimi Nakagawa2, Yuu Takahashi2, Kazuaki Iguchi2, Hiroyuki Yamamoto2, Minoru Hoshino2, Aya Hara3, Akiko Takagaki3, Fumio Nanjo3, Akira Minami4, Shinjiro Imai5, Yoriyuki Nakamura1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The consumption of green tea catechins (GTCs) suppresses age-related cognitive dysfunction in mice. GTCs are composed of several catechins, of which epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) is the most abundant, followed by epigallocatechin (EGC). Orally ingested EGCG is hydrolyzed by intestinal biota to EGC and gallic acid (GA). To understand the mechanism of action of GTCs on the brain, their permeability of the blood brain barrier (BBB) as well as their effects on cognitive function in mice and on nerve cell proliferation in vitro were examined.Entities:
Keywords: (−)-epigallocatechin gallate; 8-oxodG, 8-oxodeoxyguanosine; BBB, blood-brain barrier; Blood-brain barrier permeability; Brain plasticity; C, (+)-catechin; Cognitive dysfunction; EC, (−)-epicatechin; EGC, (−)-epigallocatechin; EGCG, (−)-epigallocatechin gallate; GA, gallic acid; GTC, green tea catechin; Green tea catechin; LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry; LPO, lipid peroxidation; MRM, multiple reaction-monitoring; Nerve cell proliferation; SAMP10, senescence-accelerated mouse prone 10.
Year: 2017 PMID: 28956003 PMCID: PMC5614586 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2016.12.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Biophys Rep ISSN: 2405-5808
Molecular weight (MW) and optimized instrument settings for LC/MS/MS measurement.
| Compound | MW | Transition | Polarity | DP | CE | CXP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precursor | Product | ||||||
| Caffeine | 194 | 195.1 | 138.0 | positive | 45.0 | 23.0 | 4.0 |
| EGCG | 458 | 457 | 168.9 | negative | −255.0 | −24.0 | −4.0 |
| EGC | 306 | 305.1 | 161.1 | negative | −45.0 | −18.0 | −4.0 |
| Gallic acid | 170 | 168.9 | 125.1 | negative | −25.0 | −24.0 | −2.0 |
DP; declustering potential, CE; collision energy, CXP; collision cell exit potential.
BBB permeability of EGCG, EGC and GA.
| Sample | Coexistence sample | Permeability coefficient | BBB permeability |
|---|---|---|---|
| (10−6 cm/s) | (%) (30 min) | ||
| EGCG | – | 9.31±0.32 | 2.77±0.10 |
| EGCG | EGC | 7.29±0.35* | 2.16±0.11* |
| EGC | – | 11.56±1.05 | 3.43±0.31 |
| EGC | EGCG | 8.58±0.88 | 2.25±0.31 |
| EGC | GA | 4.16±0.89* | 1.53±0.50* |
| GA | – | 21.97±1.92 | 6.52±0.57 |
| GA | EGC | 18.68±1.56 | 5.55±0.46 |
| Caffeine | – | 31.30±2.49 | 9.30±0.74 |
*p<0.05, Bonferroni's t-test.
Fig. 1Effect of GTCs, EGCG, EGC and GA on learning in aged SAMP10 mice. The learning time of SAMP10 mice was examined using a step-through test system. The time needed to acquire the avoidance response was measured in mice that ingested GTCs, EGCG, EGC and GA (black or gray columns) and in control mice (open column). Each value represents the mean±SEM (n=8–23). Asterisks represent a significant difference (* p<0.05, Bonferroni's t-test).
Fig. 2Effect of EGCG, EGC and GA on cell growth of human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. A cell suspension (5×104 cells/well) was plated in a 24-well plate. EGCG, EGC and GA dissolved in 0.01% DMSO were added to the culture medium to make the final concentration of 0.01–1.0 µM, and cultured for 48 h at 37 °C. The number of cells treated with EGCG (a), EGC (b), GA (c), and EGC and GA combined (d) are shown. Each value represents the mean±SEM. Asterisks represent a significant difference (* p<0.05, Bonferroni's t-test).
Fig. 3Effect of EGCG, EGC and GA on neurite outgrowth of human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. A cell suspension (2.5×104 cells/well) was plated in a 24-well plate. EGCG, EGC and GA dissolved in 0.01% DMSO were added to the culture medium to make a final concentration of 0.05 µM and cultured for 72 h at 37 °C. Photos of control cells (a), and cells treated with EGC (b), GA (c), EGC+GA (d), or EGCG (e). Neurite length (f) and neurite number (g) of cells treated with catechins. Scale bar is 50 µm. Each value represents the mean±SEM. Asterisks and # represent significant differences with the control (*) and with EGC+GA (#) (p<0.05, Bonferroni's t-test).
Fig. 4Levels of oxidative damage in the brain. LPO (a), and 8-oxodG (b) in the brain. Each value represents the mean±SEM (n=4). Asterisks represent a significant difference (* p<0.05, Bonferroni's t-test).