Literature DB >> 28954801

Functional performance 6 months after ACL reconstruction can predict return to participation in the same preinjury activity level 12 and 24 months after surgery.

Zakariya Nawasreh1,2, David Logerstedt3,4, Kathleen Cummer1, Michael Axe5,6, May Arna Risberg7, Lynn Snyder-Mackler1,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessing athletes' readiness is a key component for successful outcomes after ACL reconstruction (ACLR).
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether return-to-activity criteria, individually or in combination, at 6 months after ACLR can predict return to participation in the same preinjury activity level at 12 and 24 months after ACLR.
METHODS: Ninety-five level I/II participants completed return-to-activity criteria testing (isometric quadriceps index, single-legged hop tests, Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS) and Global Rating Score (GRS)) at 6 months after ACLR. The PASS group was defined as scoring >90% on all criteria and the FAIL group as scoring <90% on any criteria. At 12 and 24 months after ACLR, participants were asked if they had returned to participate in the same preinjury activity level or not. All return-to-activity criteria, except quadriceps index, were entered into the logistic regression model.
RESULTS: 81% and 84.4% of the PASS group returned to participation in the same preinjury activity level, while only 44.2% and 46.4% of the FAIL group returned at 12 and 24 months, respectively, after ACLR. The 6-meter timed hop, single hop and triple hop limb symmetry indexes; GRS; and KOS-ADLS individually predicted the outcome of interest at 12 months after ACLR (range: R2: 0.12-0.22, p<0.024). In combination, they explained 27% of the variance (p=0.035). All hop tests, individually, predicted the outcome of interest at 24 months after ACLR (range: R2: 0.26-0.37; p<0.007); in combination they explained 45% of the variance (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Return to participation in the same preinjury activity level at 12 and 24 months after ACLR was higher in those who passed the criteria compared with those who failed. Individual and combined return-to-activity criteria predicted the outcomes of interest, with the hop tests as consistent predictors at 12 and 24 months after ACLR. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional movement screen; knee ACL; sporting injuries; sports medicine; sports physiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28954801      PMCID: PMC5834373          DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  52 in total

Review 1.  Hop tests as predictors of dynamic knee stability.

Authors:  G K Fitzgerald; S M Lephart; J H Hwang; R S Wainner
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  Functional outcome measures for knee dysfunction assessment.

Authors:  D R Keskula; J B Duncan; V L Davis; P W Finley
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Lucy Salmon; Vivianne Russell; Tim Musgrove; Leo Pinczewski; Kathryn Refshauge
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Functional assessment and muscle strength before and after reconstruction of chronic anterior cruciate ligament lesions.

Authors:  Suzanne N de Jong; Danny R van Caspel; Michiel J van Haeff; Daniël B F Saris
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Self-reported knee function can identify athletes who fail return-to-activity criteria up to 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a delaware-oslo ACL cohort study.

Authors:  David Logerstedt; Stephanie Di Stasi; Hege Grindem; Andrew Lynch; Ingrid Eitzen; Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Reflex inhibition of the quadriceps femoris muscle after injury or reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  L Snyder-Mackler; P F De Luca; P R Williams; M E Eastlack; A R Bartolozzi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee.

Authors:  J J Irrgang; L Snyder-Mackler; R S Wainner; F H Fu; C D Harner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Laxity, instability, and functional outcome after ACL injury: copers versus noncopers.

Authors:  M E Eastlack; M J Axe; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Factors that influence the intra-articular rupture pattern of the ACL graft following single-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Eric J Kropf; James R Romanowski; Bryson P Lesniak; Michael J Tranovich; C Niek van Dijk; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-Not Exactly a One-Way Ticket Back to the Preinjury Level: A Review of Contextual Factors Affecting Return to Sport After Surgery.

Authors:  Clare L Ardern
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.843

View more
  28 in total

1.  Early clinical and neuromuscular properties in patients with normal or sub-normal subjective knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Domen Stropnik; Matjaž Sajovic; Alan Kacin; Simona Pavlič-Založnik; Matej Drobnič
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Importance of functional performance and psychological readiness for return to preinjury level of sports 1 year after ACL reconstruction in competitive athletes.

Authors:  Takuya Kitaguchi; Yoshinari Tanaka; Shinya Takeshita; Nozomi Tsujimoto; Keisuke Kita; Hiroshi Amano; Kazutaka Kinugasa; Yuta Tachibana; Takashi Natsuume; Shuji Horibe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  What is the Evidence for and Validity of Return-to-Sport Testing after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Association between Functional Performance and Return to Performance in High-Impact Sports after Lower Extremity Injury: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Astrid Vereijken; Inne Aerts; Jorrit Jetten; Bruno Tassignon; Jo Verschueren; Romain Meeusen; Emiel van Trijffel
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Clinical Decision Algorithm Associated With Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Thamlya Rocha Albano; Carlos Augusto Silva Rodrigues; Antonio Kayro Pereira Melo; Pedro Olavo de Paula; Gabriel Peixoto Leão Almeida
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Return to Sport Composite Test After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (K-STARTS): Factors Affecting Return to Sport Test Score in a Retrospective Analysis of 676 Patients.

Authors:  Florent Franck; Adnan Saithna; Thais Dutra Vieira; Charles Pioger; Gregory Vigne; Meven Le Guen; Isabelle Rogowski; Jean-Marie Fayard; Mathieu Thaunat; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.843

7.  Confidence to Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Influenced by Quadriceps Strength Symmetry and Injury Mechanism.

Authors:  Francesco Della Villa; Rachel K Straub; Bert Mandelbaum; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.843

8.  EFFECTS OF SURFACE ON TRIPLE HOP DISTANCE AND KINEMATICS.

Authors:  Amanda B Gregory; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Jeffrey B Taylor; Kevin R Ford
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-12

9.  INFLUENCE OF PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS AND GRAFT TYPES ON ACL SECOND INJURY RATES IN IPSILATERAL VERSUS CONTRALATERAL KNEES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Zakariya Nawasreh; Gabrielle Adams; Olivia Pryzbylkowski; David Logerstedt
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

10.  One in 5 Athletes Sustain Reinjury Upon Return to High-Risk Sports After ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review in 1239 Athletes Younger Than 20 Years.

Authors:  Sue Barber-Westin; Frank R Noyes
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.