| Literature DB >> 28953235 |
Sarla Saklani1, Abhay Prakash Mishra2, Harish Chandra3, Maria Stefanova Atanassova4, Milan Stankovic5, Bhawana Sati6, Mohammad Ali Shariati7,8, Manisha Nigam9, Mohammad Usman Khan10, Sergey Plygun11, Hicham Elmsellem12, Hafiz Ansar Rasul Suleria13,14.
Abstract
The in vitro antioxidant potential assay between ethanolic extracts of two species from the genus Vitex (Vitex negundo L. and Vitex trifolia L.) belonging to the Lamiaceae family were evaluated. The antioxidant properties of different extracts prepared from both plant species were evaluated by different methods. DPPH scavenging, nitric oxide scavenging, and β-carotene-linoleic acid and ferrous ion chelation methods were applied. The antioxidant activities of these two species were compared to standard antioxidants such as butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), ascorbic acid, and Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA). Both species of Vitex showed significant antioxidant activity in all of the tested methods. As compared to V. trifolia L. (60.87-89.99%; 40.0-226.7 μg/mL), V. negundo has been found to hold higher antioxidant activity (62.6-94.22%; IC50 = 23.5-208.3 μg/mL) in all assays. In accordance with antioxidant activity, total polyphenol contents in V. negundo possessed greater phenolic (89.71 mg GAE/g dry weight of extract) and flavonoid content (63.11 mg QE/g dry weight of extract) as compared to that of V. trifolia (77.20 mg GAE/g and 57.41 mg QE/g dry weight of extract respectively). Our study revealed the significant correlation between the antioxidant activity and total phenolic and flavonoid contents of both plant species.Entities:
Keywords: Nirgundi; antibacterial; chaste tree; free radical; oxidative stress; phytochemicals; scavenger
Year: 2017 PMID: 28953235 PMCID: PMC5750621 DOI: 10.3390/plants6040045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Qualitative screening of phytochemicals for selected plant extracts under different solvent systems.
| Plant Part | Extract | ‡ Carbo. | Alka. | Sapo. | Flav. | Phe. | Tan. | Terp. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pet. Ether | − | − | − | + | − | − | + | |
| Chloroform | − | + | − | − | + | + | − | |
| Ethyl Acetate | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | |
| Ethanol | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Water | + | − | + | − | − | + | − | |
| Pet. Ether | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | |
| Chloroform | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | |
| Ethyl Acetate | − | + | − | + | + | + | + | |
| Ethanol | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Water | + | − | − | + | − | + | − |
‡ Carbo. = Carbohydrates, Alka. = Alkaloids, Sapo. = Saponins, Flav. = Flavonoids, Phe. = Phenols, Tan. = Tannins, Terp. = Terpenoids; (+) = Presence, (−) = Absent.
Secondary metabolite contents in V. negundo and V. trifolia leaves.
| Parameter Analysed | ||
|---|---|---|
| Total Phenolic Contents (mg GAE/g dry weight of extract) | 89.71 ± 0.14 | 77.20 ± 0.22 |
| Total Flavonoid Contents (mg QE/g dry weight of extract) | 63.11 ± 0.31 | 57.41 ± 0.37 |
Each value is the average of three analyses ± standard deviation.
Figure 12,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay of V. negundo and V. trifolia (leaves) ethanol extract.
Figure 2β-Carotene assay of V. negundo and V. trifolia (leaves) ethanol extract.
Figure 3Nitric oxide (NO) scavenging assay of V. negundo and V. trifolia (leaves) ethanol extract.
Figure 4Ferrous ion chelating assay of V. negundo and V. trifolia (leaves) ethanol extract.