| Literature DB >> 28952476 |
Himadri S Mandal1, Richard O Cliff2, Joseph J Pancrazio3.
Abstract
Coating microelectrodes with conductive polymer is widely recognized to decrease impedance and improve performance of implantable neural devices during recording and stimulation. A concern for wide-spread use of this approach is shelf-life, i.e., the electrochemical stability of the coated microelectrodes prior to use. In this work, we investigated the possibility of using the freeze-drying process in order to retain the native low impedance state and, thereby, improve the shelf-life of conductive polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT)-PSS modified neural electrodes. Control PEDOT-PSS coated microelectrodes demonstrated a significant increase in impedance at 1 kHz after 41-50 days of room temperature storage. Based on equivalent circuit modeling derived from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, this increase in impedance could be largely attributed to a decrease in the interfacial capacitance consistent with a collapse and closing of the porous structure of the polymeric coating. Time-dependent electrochemical impedance measurements revealed higher stability of the freeze-dried coated microelectrodes compared to the controls, such that impedance values after 41-50 days appeared to be indistinguishable from the initial levels. This suggests that freeze drying PEDOT-PSS coated microelectrodes correlates with enhanced electrochemical stability during shelf storage.Entities:
Keywords: PEDOT; conductive polymer; impedance; microwires; neural electrode
Year: 2015 PMID: 28952476 PMCID: PMC5597183 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering2030176
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) ISSN: 2306-5354
Figure 1Chemical structures of Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) and Poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS).
Figure 2(a) Optical image of a PEDOT-PSS modified Pt/Ir microwire electrode; (b) Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) and (c) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) (with the coefficient of variation) of microwires in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before and after the PEDOT-PSS modification.
Figure 3EIS data (with the coefficient of variation) in PBS, immediately after the PEDOT-PSS modification (blue triangle) and after 50 days (black circle) of: (a) passed freeze-dried microwires; (b) control failed microwires; (c,d) EIS data from one representative microwire from each group. The red and green solid lines in both figures indicate the respective fit; (e) The circuit used to fit the experimental EIS data; (f) Stability comparison of freeze-dried vs. control non-freeze-dried samples. Figure shows the number of passed microwires with less than 10% change in their original impedance at 1 kHz. The green and blue bars represent the passed freeze-dried and control microwires, respectively, out of 5 in each group.
Fit parameters for the EIS data from a non-freeze-dried microwire immediately after the PEDOT deposition and after failing during d41–d50. Values in the parentheses correspond to the rel. std. error (%). Parameters for a passed freeze-dried sample (d41–d50) are also added for comparison. n is the corresponding frequency power necessary for a better fit for non-ideal capacitors.
| Non-Freeze-Dried, Immediately after PEDOT Modification | Non-Freeze-Dried (d41–d50) | Freeze-Dried, Immediately after PEDOT Modification | Freeze-Dried (d1–d50) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rs (Ohm-cm2) | 1.21 × 104 (5.22 × 100) | 4.31 × 103 (2.54 × 100) | 9.66 × 103 (2.93 × 100) | 9.39 × 103 (2.30 × 100) |
| Cd (F/cm2) | 2.88 × 10-8 (1.50 × 101) | 1.41 × 10-10 (7.62 × 100) | 2.11 × 10-8 (7.70 × 100) | 2.46 × 10-8 (7.17 × 100) |
| Rpoly (Ohm-cm2) | 3.75 × 104 (2.09 × 101) | 3.71 × 104 (3.15 × 100) | 2.96 × 104 (9.03 × 100) | 2.25 × 104 (8.89 × 100) |
| Qpoly (S-secn/cm2) | 1.24 × 10-7 (9.49 × 100) | 1.44 × 10-7 (2.69 × 100) | 1.28 × 10-7 (4.53 × 100) | 1.27 × 10-7 (3.78 × 100) |
| 9.38 × 10-1 (2.88 × 100) | 9.48 × 10-1 (8.34 × 10-1) | 9.38 × 10-1 (1.36 × 100) | 9.29 × 10-1 (1.07 × 100) |