Literature DB >> 28952159

Bacterial testing of platelets - has it prevented transfusion-transmitted bacterial infections in Australia?

J Thyer1, Z Perkowska-Guse1, S L Ismay1, A J Keller1, H T Chan1, P M Dennington1, B Bell1, G Kotsiou1, J M Pink1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Australia introduced bacterial contamination screening (BCS) for platelet components in April 2008. This study presents analysis performed to assess the efficacy of testing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven-day aerobic and anaerobic culture is performed using the BacT/ALERT 3D system. Following an initial machine positive (IMP) flag, all associated components are recalled, and/or clinicians treating already transfused patients are notified. IMPs are categorized as 'machine false positive', 'confirmed positive' or 'indeterminate' depending on culture results of initial and repeat samples.
RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2012, 1·1% of platelet donations tested IMP; since 2013, this rate has fallen to 0·6% through improved instrument management, reducing false-positive IMPs but maintaining sensitivity for cultures yielding bacterial growth. On average, 66% of confirmed positive and indeterminate platelet units had been transfused at the time of detection. The majority (95%) of these grew Propionibacterium sp., a slow-growing organism that rarely causes sepsis in the transfusion setting. The incidence of reported transfuion-transmitted bacterial infection (TTBI) has fallen since the introduction of BCS, with a 4·2-fold [0·5, 28·2] lower rate from platelets.
CONCLUSION: BCS has been successful in detecting platelet units containing pathogenic bacteria. The incidence of TTBI from platelets has fallen since the introduction of BCS, but the risk has not been eliminated due to rare false-negative results. In the absence of a pathogen inactivation system for red blood cells, BCS provides 'surrogate' testing of red blood cells from which platelets have been manufactured.
© 2017 International Society of Blood Transfusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacterial contamination; blood donation testing; haemovigilance; pathogen inactivation; platelet concentrates; platelet transfusion

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28952159     DOI: 10.1111/vox.12561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vox Sang        ISSN: 0042-9007            Impact factor:   2.144


  5 in total

Review 1.  Microbiological Screening of Platelet Concentrates in Europe.

Authors:  Marcel Prax; Isabelle Bekeredjian-Ding; Oleg Krut
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 2.  Towards increasing shelf life and haemostatic potency of stored platelet concentrates.

Authors:  Shailaja Hegde; Huzoor Akbar; Yi Zheng; Jose A Cancelas
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.284

3.  Transfusion-associated adverse events and implementation of blood safety measures - findings from the 2017 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey.

Authors:  Alexandra A Savinkina; Kathryn A Haass; Mathew R P Sapiano; Richard A Henry; James J Berger; Sridhar V Basavaraju; Jefferson M Jones
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  Characteristics of False-Positive Alarms in the BacT/Alert 3D System.

Authors:  Misato Amano; Mami Matsumoto; Shigeru Sano; Mayumi Oyama; Hideto Nagumo; Naoko Watanabe-Okochi; Nelson H Tsuno; Kazunori Nakajima; Kazuo Muroi
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-04-25

Review 5.  Bacterial contamination of platelets for transfusion: strategies for prevention.

Authors:  Jerrold H Levy; Matthew D Neal; Jay H Herman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.