| Literature DB >> 28951839 |
Eun Bo Shim1, Chae Hun Leem2, Joong Jae Kim3, Jong Yeol Kim4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Those classified as Tae-Eum (TE)-type people in Sasang constitutional medicine (SCM) are prone to obesity. Although extensive clinical observations have confirmed this tendency, the underlying physiological mechanisms are unknown. Here, we propose a novel hypothesis using integrative physiology to explain this phenomenon.Entities:
Keywords: Sasang constitutional medicine; Tae-Eum type; cellular metabolic power hypothesis; obesity; scaling law of metabolic rate
Year: 2017 PMID: 28951839 PMCID: PMC5605387 DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2017.06.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Integr Med Res ISSN: 2213-4220
Fig. 1The 3/4-power scaling law of metabolic rate shows that low cellular metabolic power can induce weight gain.
Physical constitution according to sex.
| TE type | SE type | SY type | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males | 101 (34.1%) | 87 (29.4%) | 108 (36.5%) | 296 (100%) |
| Females | 81 (32.1%) | 79 (31.3%) | 92 (36.5%) | 252 (100%) |
| Total | 182 (33.2%) | 166 (30.3%) | 200 (36.5%) | 548 (100%) |
SE, So-Eum type; SY, So-Yang type; TE, Tae-Eum type.
Comparison of target characteristics among physical constitution types for males.
| Mean ± SD | Scheffe’s test | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMR (cal/d) | TE | 1782.73 ± 319.07 | 14.80 | <0.001 | A |
| SE | 1566.24 ± 279.47 | B | |||
| SY | 1770.14 ± 305.72 | A | |||
| CMP (cal/d/kg) | TE | 22.31 ± 3.75 | 10.07 | <0.001 | B |
| SE | 24.45 ± 3.89 | A | |||
| SY | 24.63 ± 4.48 | A | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | TE | 26.41 ± 2.71 | 121.78 | <0.001 | A |
| SE | 21.54 ± 1.74 | C | |||
| SY | 23.81 ± 1.80 | B | |||
| Height (cm) | TE | 174.25 ± 5.41 | 2.87 | 0.058 | |
| SE | 172.55 ± 5.69 | ||||
| SY | 174.18 ± 5.29 | ||||
| Weight (kg) | TE | 80.22 ± 9.23 | 105.85 | <0.001 | A |
| SE | 64.21 ± 6.54 | C | |||
| SY | 72.24 ± 6.42 | B | |||
| Age (y) | TE | 30.68 ± 6.81 | 1.11 | 0.330 | |
| SE | 29.86 ± 6.34 | ||||
| SY | 29.39 ± 5.81 |
BMI, body mass index; BMR, basal metabolic rate; CMP, cellular metabolic power; SD, standard deviation; SE, So-Eum type; SY, So-Yang type; TE, Tae-Eum type.
F value in Analysis of variance.
Comparison of target characteristics among physical constitution types for females.
| Mean ± SD | Scheffe’s test | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMR (cal/d) | TE | 1346.14 ± 232.26 | 5.21 | 0.006 | A |
| SE | 1241.87 ± 235.54 | B | |||
| SY | 1256.28 ± 204.63 | B | |||
| CMP (cal/d/kg) | TE | 21.63 ± 3.76 | 7.73 | 0.001 | B |
| SE | 23.96 ± 4.42 | A | |||
| SY | 23.32 ± 3.49 | A | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | TE | 24.38 ± 2.98 | 93.71 | <0.001 | A |
| SE | 20.01 ± 1.68 | C | |||
| SY | 21.05 ± 1.46 | B | |||
| Height (cm) | TE | 160.38 ± 5.30 | 1.00 | 0.370 | |
| SE | 161.26 ± 5.06 | ||||
| SY | 160.13 ± 5.73 | ||||
| Weight (kg) | TE | 62.59 ± 7.02 | 81.80 | <0.001 | A |
| SE | 52.05 ± 5.12 | B | |||
| SY | 53.96 ± 4.48 | B | |||
| Age (y) | TE | 31.19 ± 6.75 | 0.46 | 0.633 | |
| SE | 31.25 ± 7.12 | ||||
| SY | 30.36 ± 6.80 |
BMI, body mass index; BMR, basal metabolic rate; CMP, cellular metabolic power; SD, standard deviation; SE, So-Eum type; SY, So-Yang type; TE, Tae-Eum type.
F value in Analysis of variance.
Fig. 2Percentage of individuals with a BMI >25 according to physical constitution and sex. BMI, body mass index; SE, So-Eum type; SY, So-Yang type; TE, Tae-Eum type.