Literature DB >> 28951373

[Enhanced recovery after preserving the left colonic artery during laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer].

Yun-Geng Liu1, Lei Zhang, Ji-Ran Huang, Jin-Rong Yi, Chuan-Fa Fang, Lai-Yang Xia, Hong-Quan Liu, Jian-Zhong Yi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the postoperative outcomes of preserving the left colonic artery during laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer.
METHODS: The clinicopathologic data of 91 rectal cancer patients (pathologic Stage II) undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection was retrospectively analyzed. During the surgeries, the left colonic artery was preserved in 40 patients (preserved group) and ligated in 51 patients (unpreserved group). The operating time, intraoperative blood loss, time to first flatus and defecation, duration of postoperative abdominal distension and pain, number of retrieved lymph nodes, ileum fistulation and anatomical leakage rate were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The surgeries were completed in all the 91 patients laparoscopically without conversion. There was no intraoperative complications including rectal perforation, injury to vessel or ureter in either group. The operating time, blood loss and number of retrieved lymph nodes were similar between the groups (P>0.05). Three patients in preserved group and 5 in ligation group received preventive ileum fistulation due to low rectal cancer. Anatomical leakage occurred in three patients of unpreserved group. The average duration of postoperative abdominal distension and pain was 2.14∓0.35 days in preserved group and 3.15∓0.42 days in ligation group. The time to first flatus and defecation was 37.15∓12.62 h and 3.16∓0.52 days in preserved group and 62.25∓11.75 h and 4.25∓0.75 days in ligation group. Postoperative hospital stay was 4.54∓0.42 days in preserved group and 6.23∓0.51 days in ligation group. Total hospitalization cost in the two groups was 34 525.32∓1206.36 Yuan and 41 215∓1051.32 Yuan, respectively. Significant differences were found the in duration of postoperative abdominal distension and pain, postoperative hospital stay, and total cost between the two groups (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: During laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer, preserving the left colonic artery effectively ensures the blood supply to the anastomosis and the remaining descending colon to promote the recovery of the patients after surgery.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28951373      PMCID: PMC6765479     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao        ISSN: 1673-4254


  17 in total

Review 1.  Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Karem Slim; Eric Vicaut; Marie-Véronique Launay-Savary; Caroline Contant; Jacques Chipponi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Impact of obesity on operation performed, complications, and long-term outcomes in terms of restoration of intestinal continuity for patients with mid and low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Erman Aytac; Ian C Lavery; Matthew F Kalady; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Distribution of lymph node metastases is an independent predictor of survival for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  [Present conditions and problems of transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer].

Authors:  Liang Kang; Jianping Wang
Journal:  Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2015-05

Review 5.  Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: facts, obscurity, and fiction.

Authors:  Panagiotis Taflampas; Manousos Christodoulakis; Dimitrios D Tsiftsis
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  M den Dulk; C A M Marijnen; L Collette; H Putter; L Påhlman; J Folkesson; J-F Bosset; C Rödel; K Bujko; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Oncologic impact of pathologic response on clinical outcome after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Wook Hyeon Yoon; Hun Jin Kim; Chang Hyun Kim; Jae Kyoon Joo; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 1.859

9.  Local recurrence after curative resection for rectal carcinoma: The role of surgical resection.

Authors:  Jung-A Yun; Jung Wook Huh; Hee Cheol Kim; Yoon Ah Park; Yong Beom Cho; Seong Hyeon Yun; Woo Yong Lee; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial.

Authors:  David Sebag-Montefiore; Richard J Stephens; Robert Steele; John Monson; Robert Grieve; Subhash Khanna; Phil Quirke; Jean Couture; Catherine de Metz; Arthur Sun Myint; Eric Bessell; Gareth Griffiths; Lindsay C Thompson; Mahesh Parmar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

1.  Changes of serum and peritoneal inflammatory mediators in laparoscopic radical resection for right colon carcinoma.

Authors:  Pengcheng Zhu; Wenzhong Miao; Feng Gu; Chungen Xing
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 1.407

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.