Literature DB >> 28949845

Healthy individuals' perspectives on clinical research protocols and influences on enrollment decisions.

Laura Weiss Roberts1, Jane Paik Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the perspectives of healthy individuals is important ethically and for the advancement of science. We assessed perceptions of risk associated with research procedures, comparing views of healthy individuals with and without experience in clinical research, and the respondents' reported willingness to volunteer.
METHODS: Semistructured interviews and written surveys were conducted. Study participants were healthy individuals, half of whom were currently enrolled in clinical research and half of whom had no prior experience in clinical research. Participants were queried regarding seven "minimal risk" or "greater than minimal risk" protocol vignettes with procedures of three types: routine diagnostic tests, more burdensome (i.e., more effort or potential harm) diagnostic tests, and pharmacologic interventions. Views of influences on enrollment decisions were also assessed.
RESULTS: Most healthy individuals indicated that protocols with more burdensome or pharmacologic interventions were very risky (59%, 58%), as opposed to routine diagnostic test procedures (32%). Respondents' willingness to enroll in protocols varied by type of protocol (p value < .001) and was inversely correlated with risk assessments (regression coefficients from GEE = -0.4; -0.5; -0.7). The odds of healthy individuals with research experience expressing strong willingness to enroll in the depicted protocols were twice the odds of healthy individuals without research experience expressing the same level of willingness (OR = 2.0 95% CI: [1.1, 3.9]). Respondents did not assign risk categories as institutional review boards (IRBs) would, as indicated by low agreement (26%) between respondent and expert opinion on minimal risk protocols.
CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions of procedure risk appear to influence healthy individuals' willingness to enroll in protocols. Participants with experience in clinical research were far more likely to express willingness to enroll, a finding with important scientific and ethical implications. The lack of alignment between healthy individuals' views of protocol risk and IRB categorization warrants further study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioethics; empirical research; interview; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28949845     DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1271062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth        ISSN: 2329-4515


  10 in total

1.  Attitudes of Mothers Regarding Willingness to Enroll Their Children in Research.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Maryam Rostami; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Factors Influencing Perceived Helpfulness and Participation in Innovative Research: A Pilot Study of Individuals with and without Mood Symptoms.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Tenzin Tsungmey; Maryam Rostami; Sangeeta Mondal; Max Kasun; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2021-09-22

3.  Research ethics and public trust in vaccines: the case of COVID-19 challenge trials.

Authors:  Nir Eyal
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 5.926

4.  Influence of Dispositional Optimism on Ethically Salient Research Perspectives: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Sangeeta Mondal; Tenzin Tsungmey; Katie Ryan; Laura B Dunn; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Ethics Hum Res       Date:  2022-05

5.  Healthy Volunteers' Perceptions of the Benefits of Their Participation in Phase I Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher; Lisa McManus; Megan M Wood; Marci D Cottingham; Julianne M Kalbaugh; Torin Monahan; Rebecca L Walker
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Negative association of perceived risk and willingness to participate in innovative psychiatric research protocols.

Authors:  Tenzin Tsungmey; Jane Paik Kim; Laura B Dunn; Katie Ryan; Kyle Lane-McKinley; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.791

7.  Perceived protectiveness of research safeguards and influences on willingness to participate in research: A novel MTurk pilot study.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Katie Ryan; Tenzin Tsungmey; Max Kasun; Willa A Roberts; Laura B Dunn; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Views among Malawian women about joining HIV prevention clinical trials when pregnant.

Authors:  Kristen Sullivan; Tiwonge Mtande; Elana Jaffe; Nora Rosenberg; Chifundo Zimba; Irving Hoffman; Maggie Little; Ruth Faden; Anne Drapkin Lyerly
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.250

9.  Healthy volunteers' perceptions of risk in US Phase I clinical trials: A mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher; Lisa McManus; Marci D Cottingham; Julianne M Kalbaugh; Megan M Wood; Torin Monahan; Rebecca L Walker
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Picking and Choosing Among Phase I Trials : A Qualitative Examination of How Healthy Volunteers Understand Study Risks.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher; Torin Monahan; Rebecca L Walker
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 1.352

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.