Literature DB >> 28949079

Clinical outcomes of temporary mechanical circulatory support as a direct bridge to heart transplantation: a nationwide Spanish registry.

Eduardo Barge-Caballero1, Luis Almenar-Bonet2, Francisco Gonzalez-Vilchez3, José L Lambert-Rodríguez4, José González-Costello5, Javier Segovia-Cubero6, María A Castel-Lavilla7, Juan Delgado-Jiménez8, Iris P Garrido-Bravo9, Diego Rangel-Sousa10, Manuel Martínez-Sellés11, Luis De la Fuente-Galan12, Gregorio Rábago-Juan-Aracil13, Marisa Sanz-Julve14, Daniela Hervás-Sotomayor15, Sonia Mirabet-Pérez16, Javier Muñiz17, Maria G Crespo-Leiro1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Spain, listing for high-urgent heart transplantation is allowed for critically ill candidates not weanable from temporary mechanical circulatory support (T-MCS). We sought to analyse the clinical outcomes of this strategy. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We conducted a case-by-case, retrospective review of clinical records of 291 adult patients listed for high-urgent heart transplantation under temporary devices from 2010 to 2015 in 16 Spanish institutions. Survival after listing and adverse clinical events were studied. At the time of listing, 169 (58%) patients were supported on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), 70 (24%) on temporary left ventricular assist devices (T-LVAD) and 52 (18%) on temporary biventricular assist devices (T-BiVAD). Seven patients transitioned from VA-ECMO to temporary ventricular assist devices while on the waiting list. Mean time on T-MCS was 13.1 ± 12.6 days. Mean time from listing to transplantation was 7.6 ± 8.5 days. Overall, 230 (79%) patients were transplanted and 54 (18.6%) died during MCS. In-hospital postoperative mortality after transplantation was 33.3%, 11.9% and 26.2% for patients bridged on VA-ECMO, T-LVAD and T-BiVAD, respectively (P = 0.008). Overall survival from listing to hospital discharge was 54.4%, 78.6% and 55.8%, respectively (P = 0.002). T-LVAD support was independently associated with a lower risk of death over the first year after listing (hazard ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.92). Patients treated with VA-ECMO showed the highest incidence rate of adverse clinical events associated with T-MCS.
CONCLUSION: Temporary devices may be used to bridge critically ill candidates directly to heart transplantation in a setting of short waiting list times, as is the case of Spain. In our series, bridging with T-LVAD was associated with more favourable outcomes than bridging with T-BiVAD or VA-ECMO.
© 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure © 2017 European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Heart transplantation; Mechanical circulatory support; Ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28949079     DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail        ISSN: 1388-9842            Impact factor:   15.534


  11 in total

1.  Predicting mortality after postcardiotomy venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Fausto Biancari; Angelo M Dell'Aquila; Giovanni Mariscalco
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

2.  Five years' experience with a peripheral veno-arterial ECMO for mechanical bridge to heart transplantation.

Authors:  Vitaly Poptsov; Ekaterina Spirina; Anastasiya Dogonasheva; Elizaveta Zolotova
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Inter-hospital transfer of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-assisted patients: the hub and spoke network.

Authors:  Michiel Morshuis; Frank Bruenger; Tobias Becker; Annette Kempa-Haupt; Lukasz Kizner; Riad Al-Khalil; Jan F Gummert; René Schramm
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

Review 4.  ECMO in cardiogenic shock and bridge to heart transplant.

Authors:  Mathew Jose Chakaramakkil; Cumaraswamy Sivathasan
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-02-11

5.  Improvements in Functional Status Among Survivors of Orthotopic Heart Transplantation Following High-risk Bridging Modalities.

Authors:  Lauren V Huckaby; Gavin Hickey; Ibrahim Sultan; Arman Kilic
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Bridging to Heart Transplantation: Impact of the 2018 Allocation Change.

Authors:  Lauren V Huckaby; Laura M Seese; Michael A Mathier; Gavin W Hickey; Arman Kilic
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 7.  Highlights in heart failure.

Authors:  Daniela Tomasoni; Marianna Adamo; Carlo Mario Lombardi; Marco Metra
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-12

8.  Heart transplant outcomes in patients with mechanical circulatory support: cold storage versus normothermic perfusion organ preservation.

Authors:  Sandro Sponga; Giovanni Benedetti; Nunzio Davide de Manna; Veronica Ferrara; Igor Vendramin; Andrea Lechiancole; Massimo Maiani; Sandro Nalon; Chiara Nalli; Concetta Di Nora; Uberto Bortolotti; Ugolino Livi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-08

9.  Impact of extra-corporeal life support (ECLS) cannulation strategy on outcome after durable mechanical circulation support system implantation on behalf of durable MCS after ECLS Study Group.

Authors:  Diyar Saeed; Evgenij Potapov; Antonio Loforte; Michiel Morshuis; David Schibilsky; Daniel Zimpfer; Julia Riebandt; Federico Pappalardo; Matteo Attisani; Mauro Rinaldi; Davide Pacini; Assad Haneya; Faiz Ramjankhan; Dirk W Donker; Ulrich P Jorde; Wolfgang Otto; Julia Stein; Dmytro Tsyganenko; Ameen Al-Naamani; Radi Wieloch; Rafael Ayala; Jochen Cremer; Michael Borger; Artur Lichtenberg; Jan Gummert
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-05

10.  Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as Bridge to Heart Transplantation: The Way Forward.

Authors:  Andrea Montisci; Francesco Donatelli; Silvia Cirri; Enrico Coscioni; Ciro Maiello; Claudio Napoli
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.