Literature DB >> 28949032

Implementing economic evaluation in simulation-based medical education: challenges and opportunities.

Yiqun Lin1,2, Adam Cheng1,3, Kent Hecker2,4, Vincent Grant1,3, Gillian R Currie2,3.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Simulation-based medical education (SBME) is now ubiquitous at all levels of medical training. Given the substantial resources needed for SBME, economic evaluation of simulation-based programmes or curricula is required to demonstrate whether improvement in trainee performance (knowledge, skills and attitudes) and health outcomes justifies the cost of investment. Current literature evaluating SBME fails to provide consistent and interpretable information on the relative costs and benefits of alternatives. CONTENT: Economic evaluation is widely applied in health care, but is relatively scarce in medical education. Therefore, in this paper, using a focus on SBME, we define economic evaluation, describe the key components, and discuss the challenges associated with conducting an economic evaluation of medical education interventions. As a way forward to the rigorous and state of the art application of economic evaluation in medical education, we outline the steps to gather the necessary information to conduct an economic evaluation of simulation-based education programmes and curricula, and describe the main approaches to conducting an economic evaluation.
CONCLUSION: A properly conducted economic evaluation can help stakeholders (i.e., programme directors, policy makers and curriculum designers) to determine the optimal use of resources in selecting the modality or method of assessment in simulation. It also helps inform broader decision making about allocation of scarce resources within an educational programme, as well as between education and clinical care. Economic evaluation in medical education research is still in its infancy, and there is significant potential for state-of-the-art application of these methods in this area.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28949032     DOI: 10.1111/medu.13411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  11 in total

1.  Optimizing resource utilization during proficiency-based training of suturing skills in medical students: a randomized controlled trial of faculty-led, peer tutor-led, and holography-augmented methods of teaching.

Authors:  Madeline Lemke; Hillary Lia; Alexander Gabinet-Equihua; Guy Sheahan; Andrea Winthrop; Stephen Mann; Gabor Fichtinger; Boris Zevin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of workplace-based distributed cardiopulmonary resuscitation training versus conventional annual basic life support training.

Authors:  Yiqun Lin; Kent Hecker; Adam Cheng; Vincent J Grant; Gillian Currie
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-09-29

3.  Cost-effectiveness of a video game versus live simulation for disaster training.

Authors:  Travis Whitfill; Marc Auerbach; Maria Carmen G Diaz; Barbara Walsh; Daniel J Scherzer; Isabel T Gross; Mark X Cicero
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-09-03

4.  Revisiting Pseudo-Haptics for Psychomotor Skills Development in Online Teaching.

Authors:  Bill Kapralos; Alvaro Quevedo; Celina Da Silva; Eva Peisachovich; K C Collins; Kamen Kanev; Adam Dubrowski
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-30

5.  Can simulation-based education and precision teaching improve paediatric trainees' behavioural fluency in performing lumbar puncture? A pilot study.

Authors:  Sinéad Lydon; Bronwyn Reid McDermott; Ethel Ryan; Paul O'Connor; Sharon Dempsey; Chloe Walsh; Dara Byrne
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  The effect of multiple exposures in scenario-based simulation-A mixed study systematic review.

Authors:  Alette H Svellingen; Margrethe B Søvik; Kari Røykenes; Guttorm Brattebø
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-09-29

7.  Translational simulation: from description to action.

Authors:  Christopher Peter Nickson; Andrew Petrosoniak; Stephanie Barwick; Victoria Brazil
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-04

8.  Rational and Design of the SIMULATOR Study: A Multicentre Randomized Study to Assess the Impact of SIMULation-bAsed Training on Transoesophageal echocardiOgraphy leaRning for Cardiology Residents.

Authors:  Théo Pezel; Anne Bernard; Yoan Lavie Badie; Julien Dreyfus; Etienne Audureau; Yohann Bohbot; Damien Fard; Arnaud Hubert; Lee S Nguyen; Cécile Monteil; Loïc Bière; Florent Le Ven; Marjorie Canu; Sophie Ribeyrolles; Baptiste Mion; Basile Mouhat; Baptiste Bazire; Charles Fauvel; Julien Ternacle; Jennifer Cautela; Théo Cambet; Thierry Le Tourneau; Erwan Donal; Stéphane Lafitte; Nicolas Mansencal; Augustin Coisne
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-24

9.  Most significant barriers and proposed solutions for medical schools to facilitate simulation-based undergraduate curriculum in OBGYN.

Authors:  Hira Salman
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.344

10.  Physiotherapy students can be educated to portray realistic patient roles in simulation: a pragmatic observational study.

Authors:  Shane A Pritchard; Jennifer L Keating; Debra Nestel; Felicity C Blackstock
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.