Literature DB >> 2894883

Nifedipine and atenolol singly and combined for treatment of essential hypertension: comparative multicentre study in general practice in the United Kingdom. Nifedipine-Atenolol Study Review Committee.

.   

Abstract

A randomised double blind parallel group study was performed to compare the efficacy and acceptability of slow release nifedipine (maximum dose 40 mg twice a day) with those of atenolol (maximum dose 100 mg once a day) as single agents for the treatment of essential hypertension. Of 410 patients recruited almost exclusively from general practices in 22 centres in the United Kingdom 210 received nifedipine and 200 atenolol. Both drugs significantly reduced blood pressure, and control--a reduction of the diastolic pressure to less than 95 mm Hg--was obtained in about 65% of patients. Those who received nifedipine had more pronounced reductions in systolic pressure than those who received atenolol. One hundred and forty nine patients who failed to respond adequately to either atenolol or nifedipine in low doses were given both drugs once daily for eight weeks in a fixed combination capsule that contained atenolol 50 mg and nifedipine 20 mg. All patients showed further reductions in blood pressure, although those who were taking beta atenolol before the combination capsule had more pronounced reductions in systolic pressures. Twenty six patients (12%) were withdrawn because of adverse effects while taking nifedipine compared with 19 (10%) taking atenolol. Flushing and oedema were more common after the calcium antagonist, whereas diarrhoea and dyspepsia were more common after atenolol. The frequencies of headaches, dizziness, fatigue, and dyspnoea were equally distributed between the two groups. When the fixed combination capsule was taken side effects such as flushing and oedema continued. Nifedipine was more effective than atenolol in lowering systolic blood pressure, although neither drug used alone controlled the pressure of more than two thirds of the patients studied. When used in a fixed combination slightly better control of blood pressure was achieved with a lower dose of each drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2894883      PMCID: PMC2545049     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  5 in total

1.  Is nifedipine a suitable first-line treatment for essential hypertension in general practice?

Authors:  F M Sullivan; T S Murray; N Gaw; J J Langan; B J Adams-Strump
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  The Medical Research Council Trial.

Authors:  O Paul
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Relationship between the antihypertensive effect and steady-state plasma concentration of nifedipine given alone or in combination with a beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent.

Authors:  O Lederballe Pedersen; C K Christensen; E Mikkelsen; K D Rämsch
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. A cooperative study.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Long-term therapy of arterial hypertension with nifedipine given alone or in combination with a beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent.

Authors:  S E Husted; H K Nielsen; C K Christensen; O Lederballe Pedersen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.953

  5 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  Resistant hypertension and the Birmingham Hypertension Square.

Authors:  D C Felmeden; G Y Lip
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Atenolol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  A N Wadworth; D Murdoch; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Nifedipine as low-dose monotherapy for essential hypertension: a primary care study.

Authors:  L D Ritchie; L T Harrington; A R MacGregor; M J Vandenburg
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.727

4.  Nifedipine and/or atenolol for mild to moderate hypertension: a general practice study.

Authors:  D Maclean; A M Heagerty
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 5.  Peripheral vasoconstriction induced by β-adrenoceptor blockers: a systematic review and a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Charles Khouri; Thomas Jouve; Sophie Blaise; Patrick Carpentier; Jean-Luc Cracowski; Matthieu Roustit
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Sustained release nifedipine formulations. An appraisal of their current uses and prospective roles in the treatment of hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disorders.

Authors:  D Murdoch; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Increase in plasma propranolol caused by nicardipine is dependent on the delivery rate of propranolol.

Authors:  I Vercruysse; D L Massart; A G Dupont
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  Quality of life in the treatment of hypertension. The effect of calcium antagonists.

Authors:  A Fletcher; C Bulpitt
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Double-blind, randomized comparative study of the antihypertensive effect of nicardipine slow-release and nifedipine slow-release in hypertensive patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  F K Maetzel; W E Teufel; A Griebel; M H Glocke
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 10.  [Atenolol/nifedipine combination: efficacy and tolerability of low dose synergistic bitherapy in the treatment of arterial hypertension].

Authors:  A Krivitzky; G Nguyen; Y Gaudouen; M Legrand; R Cohen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.