Literature DB >> 28948475

Correlation of abdominopelvic computed tomography with clinical manifestations in methamphetamine body stuffers.

Hooman Bahrami-Motlagh1, Hossein Hassanian-Moghaddam2,3, Hedieh Zamini1, Nasim Zamani4,5, Latif Gachkar6.   

Abstract

Little is known about methamphetamine body stuffers and correlation of clinical manifestations with imaging studies. Current study was done to determine abdominopelvic computed tomography findings and clinical manifestations in methamphetamine body stuffers. In an IRB-approved routine data base study, demographic characteristics, clinical findings, and CT results of 70 methamphetamine body stuffers were retrieved. According to the clinical manifestations, the patients were categorized into either benign- or severe-outcome group. Also, they were determined to have positive or negative CT results. In the group with positive results, number and place of the baggies were determined, as well. Results of the CT were compared between the two groups. Almost 43% of the patients had positive abdominopelvic CT results. Mean density of the packs was 176.2 ± 152.7 Hounsfield unit. Based on the clinical grounds, 57% of the patients were in the benign- and 33% were in the severe-outcome group. In the benign group, 45% of the patients had positive CTs while in the severe-risk group, this was 40% (p > 0.05). Except variables defined as severe outcome (seizure, intubation, creatinine level, aspartate aminotransferase level, creatine phosphokinase and troponin level), agitation, on-arrival pulse rate, lactate dehydrogenase, bicarbonate, base excess, loss of consciousness and hospitalization period were correlating factors. But in regression analysis, we could not find a significant variable that prognosticate severe outcome. It seems that there is no relationship between the CT findings and clinical manifestations of the methamphetamine body stuffers. Severe outcomes may be observed even in the face of negative CTs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominopelvic CT; Baggie; Body stuffer; Methamphetamine; Poisoning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28948475     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-017-0818-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  26 in total

1.  "Drug mules" as a radiological challenge: sensitivity and specificity in identifying internal cocaine in body packers, body pushers and body stuffers by computed tomography, plain radiography and Lodox.

Authors:  Patricia M Flach; Steffen G Ross; Garyfalia Ampanozi; Lars Ebert; Tanja Germerott; Gary M Hatch; Michael J Thali; Michael A Patak
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  The fatal case of a cocaine body-stuffer and a literature review - towards evidence based management.

Authors:  G A Norfolk
Journal:  J Forensic Leg Med       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 1.614

3.  The cocaine body-packer syndrome: evaluation of a method of contrast study of the bowel.

Authors:  B Marc; F J Baud; M J Aelion; R Gherardi; O Diamant-Berger; M Blery; C Bismuth
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.832

4.  Walking on thin ice! Identifying methamphetamine "drug mules" on digital plain radiography.

Authors:  S N Abdul Rashid; S B Mohamad Saini; S Abdul Hamid; S J Muhammad; R Mahmud; M J Thali; P M Flach
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Clinical course of crack cocaine body stuffers.

Authors:  K A Sporer; J Firestone
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Medical outcome of cocaine bodystuffers.

Authors:  R June; S E Aks; N Keys; M Wahl
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  Methamphetamine toxicity secondary to intravaginal body stuffing.

Authors:  John Kashani; Anne-Michelle Ruha
Journal:  J Toxicol Clin Toxicol       Date:  2004

8.  The cocaine 'body packer' syndrome. Diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  M M McCarron; J D Wood
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Risk Factors for Mortality and Endotracheal Intubation after Methadone Intoxication.

Authors:  Hossein Hassanian-Moghaddam; Kambiz Soltaninejad; Shahin Shadnia; Ali Kabir; Mitra Movahedi; Amirhossein Mirafzal
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.080

Review 10.  Methamphetamine-induced toxicity: an updated review on issues related to hyperthermia.

Authors:  Rae R Matsumoto; Michael J Seminerio; Ryan C Turner; Matthew J Robson; Linda Nguyen; Diane B Miller; James P O'Callaghan
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 12.310

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Dual-energy CT: theoretical principles and clinical applications.

Authors:  Andrea Agostini; Alessandra Borgheresi; Alberto Mari; Chiara Floridi; Federico Bruno; Marina Carotti; Nicolò Schicchi; Antonio Barile; Stefania Maggi; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Oral clonazepam versus lorazepam in the treatment of methamphetamine-poisoned children: a pilot clinical trial.

Authors:  Fariba Farnaghi; Razieh Rahmani; Hossein Hassanian-Moghaddam; Nasim Zamani; Rebecca McDonald; Narges Gholami; Latif Gachkar
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.125

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.