Literature DB >> 22178312

"Drug mules" as a radiological challenge: sensitivity and specificity in identifying internal cocaine in body packers, body pushers and body stuffers by computed tomography, plain radiography and Lodox.

Patricia M Flach1, Steffen G Ross, Garyfalia Ampanozi, Lars Ebert, Tanja Germerott, Gary M Hatch, Michael J Thali, Michael A Patak.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of computed tomography (CT), digital radiography (DR) and low-dose linear slit digital radiography (LSDR, Lodox(®)) in the detection of internal cocaine containers.
METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. The study collectively consisted of 83 patients (76 males, 7 females, 16-45 years) suspected of having incorporated cocaine drug containers. All underwent radiological imaging; a total of 135 exams were performed: nCT=35, nDR=70, nLSDR=30. An overall calculation of all "drug mules" and a specific evaluation of body packers, pushers and stuffers were performed. The gold standard was stool examination in a dedicated holding cell equipped with a drug toilet.
RESULTS: There were 54 drug mules identified in this study. CT of all drug carriers showed the highest diagnostic accuracy 97.1%, sensitivity 100% and specificity 94.1%. DR in all cases was 71.4% accurate, 58.3% sensitive and 85.3% specific. LSDR of all patients with internal cocaine was 60% accurate, 57.9% sensitive and 63.4% specific.
CONCLUSIONS: CT was the most accurate test studied. Therefore, the detection of internal cocaine drug packs should be performed by CT, rather than by conventional X-ray, in order to apply the most sensitive exam in the medico-legal investigation of suspected drug carriers. Nevertheless, the higher radiation applied by CT than by DR or LSDR needs to be considered. Future studies should include evaluation of low dose CT protocols in order to address germane issues and to reduce dosage.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22178312     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  18 in total

Review 1.  The role of radiology in diagnosis and management of drug mules: an update with new challenges and new diagnostic tools.

Authors:  Mesut Bulakci; Ferhat Cengel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Radiographic features of intracorporeally smuggled liquid cocaine.

Authors:  Oshry Mozes; Larisa Guranda; Orith Portnoy; Sara Apter; Eli Konen; Michal M Amitai
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 2.007

3.  Dual-energy CT behavior of heroin, cocaine, and typical adulterants.

Authors:  Patrick J Laberke; Juergen Fornaro; Suk-kyum Kim; Simon Blum; Marc Augsburger; Hatem Alkadhi; Simon Wildermuth; Roland Hausmann; Sebastian Leschka
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  Differentiation of heroin and cocaine using dual-energy CT-an experimental study.

Authors:  Jochen Grimm; Ramona Wudy; Edvard Ziegeler; Stefan Wirth; Michael Uhl; Maximilian F Reiser; Michael Scherr
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Radiological and practical aspects of body packing.

Authors:  A Pinto; A Reginelli; F Pinto; G Sica; M Scaglione; F H Berger; L Romano; L Brunese
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Walking on thin ice! Identifying methamphetamine "drug mules" on digital plain radiography.

Authors:  S N Abdul Rashid; S B Mohamad Saini; S Abdul Hamid; S J Muhammad; R Mahmud; M J Thali; P M Flach
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Low-dose CT in body-packers: delineation of body packs and radiation dose in a porcine model.

Authors:  Michael K Scherr; Oliver Peschel; Jochen M Grimm; Edvard Ziegeler; Michael Uhl; Lucas L Geyer; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan Wirth
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 8.  Systematic review of the toxicological and radiological features of body packing.

Authors:  Simone Cappelletti; Daria Piacentino; Gabriele Sani; Edoardo Bottoni; Paola Antonella Fiore; Mariarosaria Aromatario; Costantino Ciallella
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Correlation of abdominopelvic computed tomography with clinical manifestations in methamphetamine body stuffers.

Authors:  Hooman Bahrami-Motlagh; Hossein Hassanian-Moghaddam; Hedieh Zamini; Nasim Zamani; Latif Gachkar
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Detection of residual packets in cocaine body packers: low accuracy of abdominal radiography-a prospective study.

Authors:  Pascal Rousset; Pierre-Fleury Chaillot; Etienne Audureau; Caroline Rey-Salmon; Bertrand Becour; Isabelle Fitton; Dominique Vadrot; Marie-Pierre Revel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.