Literature DB >> 28948440

Should intrauterine human chorionic gonadotropin infusions ever be used prior to embryo transfer?

Michelle Volovsky1,2, Martin Healey3,4,5, Vivien MacLachlan5, Beverley J Vollenhoven6,5,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the factors that influence the outcome of intrauterine human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) infusion at the time of embryo transfer (ET), in particular, the effect of hCG infusions on fresh and frozen embryo transfers (FETs) and whether prior recurrent implantation failure (RIF) impacts upon outcomes.
METHOD: This was a case-control study based on a standardized database from a multi-site in vitro fertilization clinic. The analysis contains 458 cases and 749 matched controls, with an intervention group of those given intrauterine hCG prior to ET and a control group of patients receiving no hCG infusion. Outcomes were defined as clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Two analyses were performed. The first separated FETs (cases n = 224, controls n = 325) and fresh ETs (cases n = 234, controls n = 424), with outcomes calculated in each group. The second analysis divided patients into those with RIF (cases n = 149, controls n = 200) and those without (cases n = 309, controls n = 549).
RESULTS: Results in fresh ETs demonstrated a 5.8% reduction (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.60, p = 0.041) in clinical pregnancy rates with the use of intrauterine hCG. In those without defined RIF, clinical pregnancy rates were reduced by 8.1% (AOR = 0.61, p = 0.023) and live birth rates by 7.2% (AOR = 0.56, p = 0.32) with intrauterine hCG use. There were no significant differences in outcomes in FETs and in the RIF cohort.
CONCLUSION: Intrauterine hCG at the time of ET not only seems to have no benefit, but rather a negative effect in fresh ETs and those without RIF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embryo transfer; Human chorionic gonadotropin; IVF; Implantation; Intrauterine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28948440      PMCID: PMC5845027          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-1049-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  17 in total

Review 1.  The endometrium in stimulated cycles for IVF.

Authors:  Claire Bourgain; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 2.  Investigation and treatment of repeated implantation failure following IVF-ET.

Authors:  E J Margalioth; A Ben-Chetrit; M Gal; T Eldar-Geva
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-08-12       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists, and human chorionic gonadotropin on endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up.

Authors:  Efstratios Kolibianakis; Claire Bourgain; Carola Albano; Kaan Osmanagaoglu; Johan Smitz; Andre Van Steirteghem; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Kai Mee Wong; Madelon van Wely; Femke Mol; Sjoerd Repping; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-28

5.  Intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin before embryo transfer significantly improves the implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ragaa Mansour; Nevine Tawab; Omnia Kamal; Yahia El-Faissal; Ahmed Serour; Mohamed Aboulghar; Gamal Serour
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kalliopi E Loutradi; Efstratios M Kolibianakis; Christos A Venetis; Evangelos G Papanikolaou; George Pados; Ioannis Bontis; Basil C Tarlatzis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matheus Roque; Karinna Lattes; Sandra Serra; Ivan Solà; Selmo Geber; Ramón Carreras; Miguel Angel Checa
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients.

Authors:  D Haouzi; S Assou; K Mahmoud; S Tondeur; T Rème; B Hedon; J De Vos; S Hamamah
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  A randomized controlled dose-response pilot study of addition of hCG to recombinant FSH during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  L L Thuesen; A Loft; A N Egeberg; J Smitz; J H Petersen; A Nyboe Andersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Effect of intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin before embryo transfer on clinical pregnancy rates from in vitro fertilisation cycles: a prospective study.

Authors:  Alvaro Santibañez; Jorge García; Olga Pashkova; Omar Colín; Guillermo Castellanos; Ana P Sánchez; Julio F De la Jara
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.211

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin before fresh embryo transfer on IVF and ICSI outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenhui Hou; Gaohui Shi; Bing Cai; Chenhui Ding; Junli Song; Xiubing Zhang; Yanwen Xu
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 2.  Human Chorionic Gonadotropin-Mediated Immune Responses That Facilitate Embryo Implantation and Placentation.

Authors:  Anne Schumacher; Ana C Zenclussen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Efficacy of therapies and interventions for repeated embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Busnelli; Edgardo Somigliana; Federico Cirillo; Annamaria Baggiani; Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.