Literature DB >> 23040524

Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Matheus Roque1, Karinna Lattes, Sandra Serra, Ivan Solà, Selmo Geber, Ramón Carreras, Miguel Angel Checa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the available evidence to assess if cryopreservation of all embryos and subsequent frozen embryo transfer (FET) results in better outcomes compared with fresh transfer.
DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
SETTING: Centers for reproductive care. PATIENT(S): Infertility patient(s). INTERVENTION(S): An exhaustive electronic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed through December 2011. We included randomized clinical trials comparing outcomes of IVF cycles between fresh and frozen embryo transfers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The outcomes of interest were ongoing pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and miscarriage. RESULT(S): We included three trials accounting for 633 cycles in women aged 27-33 years. Data analysis showed that FET resulted in significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rates and clinical pregnancy rates. CONCLUSION(S): Our results suggest that there is evidence that IVF outcomes may be improved by performing FET compared with fresh embryo transfer. This could be explained by a better embryo-endometrium synchrony achieved with endometrium preparation cycles.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23040524     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  138 in total

1.  Agonist depot versus OCP programming of frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis of freeze-all cycles.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Murat Berkkanoglu; Hasan Bulut; Peter Humaidan; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Is there a robust future for research in reproduction?

Authors:  Christopher L R Barratt
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Ho; Irene Woo; Kristin Louie; Wael Salem; Sami I Jabara; Kristin A Bendikson; Richard J Paulson; Karine Chung
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Utilization rates and results of long-term embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatment.

Authors:  M M Dolmans; S Hollanders de Ouderaen; D Demylle; C Pirard
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Number of embryos transferred after in vitro fertilization and good perinatal outcome.

Authors:  Dmitry M Kissin; Aniket D Kulkarni; Vitaly A Kushnir; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Assisted hatching and live births in first-cycle frozen embryo transfers.

Authors:  Jennifer F Knudtson; Courtney M Failor; Jonathan A Gelfond; Martin W Goros; Tiencheng Arthur Chang; Robert S Schenken; Randal D Robinson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Abnormal implantation after fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Erica T Wang; Anupama S Q Kathiresan; Catherine Bresee; Naomi Greene; Carolyn Alexander; Margareta D Pisarska
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  A grafted ovarian fragment rescues host fertility after chemotherapy.

Authors:  Iordan Stefanov Batchvarov; Rachel Williamson Taylor; Ximena Bustamante-Marín; Michael Czerwinski; Erika Segear Johnson; Sally Kornbluth; Blanche Capel
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Higher efficiency of frozen embryo transfer in male infertility cases in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Fatih Adanacıoğlu; Zeynep Gözde Tokat; Dürdane Büyükfidan; Hanifi M Özgül; Ferhat I Urunsak; Selahittin Çayan; Turan M Çetin
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-12-01

Review 10.  Current approach to fertility preservation by embryo cryopreservation.

Authors:  Giuliano Bedoschi; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.