Haejin In1, Ethan Ravetch2, Marisa Langdon-Embry2, Bryan Palis3, Jaffer A Ajani4, Wayne L Hofstetter5, David P Kelsen6, Takeshi Sano7. 1. Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave. Block Building#112, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. hin@montefiore.org. 2. Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave. Block Building#112, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. 3. NCDB Research Unit, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 5. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 6. Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 7. Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: New stage grouping classifications for clinical (cStage) and post-neoadjuvant treatment (ypStage) stage for gastric adenocarcinoma have been proposed for the eighth edition of the AJCC manual. This article summarizes the analysis for these stages. METHODS: Gastric adenocarcinoma patients diagnosed in 2004-2009 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The cStage cohort included both surgical and nonsurgical cases, and the ypStage cohort included only patients who had chemotherapy or radiation therapy before surgery. Survival differences between the stage groups were determined by the log-rank test and prognostic accuracy was assessed by concordance index. Analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS, Cary, NC, USA). RESULTS: Five strata for cStage and four strata for ypStage were developed. The 5-year survival rates for cStages were 56.77%, 47.39%, 33.1%, 25.9%, and 5.0% for stages I, IIa, IIb, III, and IV, respectively, and the rates for ypStage were 74.2%, 46.3%, 19.2%, and 11.6% for stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The log-rank test showed that survival differences were well stratified and stage groupings were ordered and distinct (p < 0.0001). The proposed cStage and ypStage classification was sensitive and specific and had high prognostic accuracy (cStage: c index = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.79-0.83; ypStage: c index = 0.80, 95% CI, 0.73-0.87). CONCLUSION: The proposed eighth edition establishes two new staging schemata that provide essential prognostic data for patients before treatment and for patients who have undergone surgery following neoadjuvant therapy. These additions are a significant advance to the AJCC staging manual and will provide critical guidance to clinicians in making informed decisions throughout the treatment course.
PURPOSE: New stage grouping classifications for clinical (cStage) and post-neoadjuvant treatment (ypStage) stage for gastric adenocarcinoma have been proposed for the eighth edition of the AJCC manual. This article summarizes the analysis for these stages. METHODS:Gastric adenocarcinomapatients diagnosed in 2004-2009 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The cStage cohort included both surgical and nonsurgical cases, and the ypStage cohort included only patients who had chemotherapy or radiation therapy before surgery. Survival differences between the stage groups were determined by the log-rank test and prognostic accuracy was assessed by concordance index. Analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS, Cary, NC, USA). RESULTS: Five strata for cStage and four strata for ypStage were developed. The 5-year survival rates for cStages were 56.77%, 47.39%, 33.1%, 25.9%, and 5.0% for stages I, IIa, IIb, III, and IV, respectively, and the rates for ypStage were 74.2%, 46.3%, 19.2%, and 11.6% for stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The log-rank test showed that survival differences were well stratified and stage groupings were ordered and distinct (p < 0.0001). The proposed cStage and ypStage classification was sensitive and specific and had high prognostic accuracy (cStage: c index = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.79-0.83; ypStage: c index = 0.80, 95% CI, 0.73-0.87). CONCLUSION: The proposed eighth edition establishes two new staging schemata that provide essential prognostic data for patients before treatment and for patients who have undergone surgery following neoadjuvant therapy. These additions are a significant advance to the AJCC staging manual and will provide critical guidance to clinicians in making informed decisions throughout the treatment course.
Authors: Pooja R Rohatgi; Paul F Mansfield; Christopher H Crane; Tsung-Teh Wu; Punita K Sunder; William A Ross; Jeffrey S Morris; Peter W Pisters; Barry W Feig; Leonard L Gunderson; Jaffer A Ajani Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: J A Ajani; P F Mansfield; C H Crane; T T Wu; S Lunagomez; P M Lynch; N Janjan; B Feig; J Faust; J C Yao; R Nivers; J Morris; P W Pisters Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Caprice C Greenberg; Stuart R Lipsitz; Bridget Neville; Haejin In; Nathanael Hevelone; Stacy A Porter; Christine Weeks; Ashish K Jha; Atul A Gawande; Deborah Schrag; Jane C Weeks Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2011-06-20
Authors: J A Ajani; P F Mansfield; N Janjan; J Morris; P W Pisters; P M Lynch; B Feig; R Myerson; R Nivers; D S Cohen; L L Gunderson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J A Ajani; R J Mayer; D M Ota; G D Steele; D Evans; M Roh; D J Sugarbaker; P Dumas; C Gray; D A Vena Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1993-11-17 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: J X Lin; C Yoon; J Desiderio; B C Yi; P Li; C H Zheng; A Parisi; C M Huang; V E Strong; S S Yoon Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Etsuro Bando; Xinge Ji; Michael W Kattan; Ho Seok Seo; Kyo Young Song; Cho-Hyun Park; Maria Bencivenga; Giovanni de Manzoni; Masanori Terashima Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Gina Kim; Patricia Friedmann; Ian Solsky; Peter Muscarella; John McAuliffe; Haejin In Journal: J Gastric Cancer Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 3.720
Authors: Jeong Il Yu; Do Hoon Lim; Jeeyun Lee; Won Ki Kang; Se Hoon Park; Joon Oh Park; Young Suk Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Seung Tae Kim; Su Jin Lee; Sung Kim; Tae Sung Sohn; Jun Ho Lee; Ji Yeong An; Min Gew Choi; Jae Moon Bae; Heejin Yoo; Kyunga Kim Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 4.679