Literature DB >> 28948195

Three-dimensional segmentation of breast masses from digital breast tomosynthesis images.

Stefanie T L Pöhlmann1, Yit Y Lim2, Elaine Harkness1, Susan Pritchard2, Christopher J Taylor1, Susan M Astley1.   

Abstract

Assessment of three-dimensional (3-D) morphology and volume of breast masses is important for cancer diagnosis, staging, and treatment but cannot be derived from conventional mammography. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) provides data from which 3-D mass segmentation could be obtained. Our method combined Gaussian mixture models based on intensity and a texture measure indicative of in-focus structure, gray-level variance. Thresholding these voxel probabilities, weighted by distance to the estimated mass center, gave the final 3-D segmentation. Evaluation used 40 masses annotated twice by a consultant radiologist on in-focus slices in two diagnostic views. Human intraobserver variability was assessed as the overlap between repeated annotations (median 77% and range 25% to 91%). Comparing the segmented mass outline with probability-weighted ground truth from these annotations, median agreement was 68%, and range was 7% to 88%. Annotated and segmented diameters correlated well with histological mass size (both Spearman's rank correlations [Formula: see text]). The volumetric segmentation demonstrated better agreement with tumor volumes estimated from pathology than volume derived from radiological annotations (95% limits of agreement [Formula: see text] to 11 ml and [Formula: see text] to 41 ml, respectively). We conclude that it is feasible to assess 3-D mass morphology and volume from DBT, and the method has the potential to aid breast cancer management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gaussian mixture modeling; digital breast tomosynthesis; mass segmentation; texture; tumor size; tumor volume

Year:  2017        PMID: 28948195      PMCID: PMC5603772          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.034007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  30 in total

1.  MRI measurements of breast tumor volume predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence-free survival.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Jessica E Gibbs; Ying Lu; Laura J Esserman; Debasish Tripathy; Dulcy S Wolverton; Hope S Rugo; E Shelley Hwang; Cheryl A Ewing; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information.

Authors:  Georgia D Tourassi; Rene Vargas-Voracek; David M Catarious; Carey E Floyd
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Yiheng Zhang; Mark A Helvie; Richard H Moore; Berkman Sahiner; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Deep feature learning for knee cartilage segmentation using a triplanar convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Adhish Prasoon; Kersten Petersen; Christian Igel; François Lauze; Erik Dam; Mads Nielsen
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial.

Authors:  J A van Dongen; A C Voogd; I S Fentiman; C Legrand; R J Sylvester; D Tong; E van der Schueren; P A Helle; K van Zijl; H Bartelink
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-19       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  Laurence E McCahill; Richard M Single; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Heather S Feigelson; Ted A James; Tom Barney; Jessica M Engel; Adedayo A Onitilo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Measurement of tumour size with mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance imaging as compared to histological tumour size in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Ines V Gruber; Miriam Rueckert; Karl O Kagan; Annette Staebler; Katja C Siegmann; Andreas Hartkopf; Diethelm Wallwiener; Markus Hahn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics.

Authors:  R Jeevan; D A Cromwell; M Trivella; G Lawrence; O Kearins; J Pereira; C Sheppard; C M Caddy; J H P van der Meulen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-07-12

10.  Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; E P Winer; A S Coates; R D Gelber; M Piccart-Gebhart; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  2 in total

1.  Monte Carlo study on optimal breast voxel resolution for dosimetry estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Christian Fedon; Carolina Rabin; Marco Caballo; Oliver Diaz; Eloy García; Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz; Gabriel A González-Sprinberg; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Mass Detection and Segmentation in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using 3D-Mask Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Ming Fan; Huizhong Zheng; Shuo Zheng; Chao You; Yajia Gu; Xin Gao; Weijun Peng; Lihua Li
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2020-11-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.