| Literature DB >> 28948141 |
Denny Milakara1, Cristian Grozea2, Markus Dahlem3, Sebastian Major1,4,5, Maren K L Winkler1, Janos Lückl1, Michael Scheel6, Vasilis Kola1, Karl Schoknecht1,5, Svetlana Lublinsky7, Alon Friedman7,8, Peter Martus9, Jed A Hartings10, Johannes Woitzik11, Jens P Dreier1,4,5.
Abstract
In many cerebral grey matter structures including the neocortex, spreading depolarization (SD) is the principal mechanism of the near-complete breakdown of the transcellular ion gradients with abrupt water influx into neurons. Accordingly, SDs are abundantly recorded in patients with traumatic brain injury, spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and malignant hemispheric stroke using subdural electrode strips. SD is observed as a large slow potential change, spreading in the cortex at velocities between 2 and 9 mm/min. Velocity and SD susceptibility typically correlate positively in various animal models. In patients monitored in neurocritical care, the Co-Operative Studies on Brain Injury Depolarizations (COSBID) recommends several variables to quantify SD occurrence and susceptibility, although accurate measures of SD velocity have not been possible. Therefore, we developed an algorithm to estimate SD velocities based on reconstructing SD trajectories of the wave-front's curvature center from magnetic resonance imaging scans and time-of-SD-arrival-differences between subdural electrode pairs. We then correlated variables indicating SD susceptibility with algorithm-estimated SD velocities in twelve aSAH patients. Highly significant correlations supported the algorithm's validity. The trajectory search failed significantly more often for SDs recorded directly over emerging focal brain lesions suggesting in humans similar to animals that the complexity of SD propagation paths increase in tissue undergoing injury.Entities:
Keywords: 3D, three dimensional; AC, alternating current; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; COSBID, Co-Operative Studies on Brain Injury Depolarizations; CT, computed tomography; Cytotoxic edema; DC, direct current; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; E, electrode; ECoG, electrocorticography; FLAIR, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; HU, Hounsfield units; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; IOS, intrinsic optical signal; Ischemia; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MHS, malignant hemispheric stroke; MPRAGE, magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NO, nitric oxide; PTDDD, peak total SD-induced depression duration of a recording day; R_diff, radius difference; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; SD, spreading depolarization; SPC, slow potential change; Spreading depression; Stroke; Subarachnoid hemorrhage; TBI, traumatic brain injury; TOAD, time-of-SD-arrival-difference; Traumatic brain injury; V_diff, velocity difference; WFNS, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies; aSAH, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28948141 PMCID: PMC5602748 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.09.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Fig. 1Methodological basis. (A) Wyler electrode strip placed on the cortical surface during craniotomy in a patient with aSAH. Note the subarachnoid blood clot in the lower left region. (B) The first two SDs of a cluster are shown. The first SD starts in electrically active tissue. In electrically active tissue, SD induces spreading depression of activity. Such SDs in electrically active tissue received the epithet “spreading depression”. The second SD starts in tissue that is still electrically inactive after the previous SD. Under this condition, SD is denoted with the adjective “isoelectric” (Dreier et al., 2017). (C) Patch cut out from the brain and discretized in the form of a mesh. The cortical surface is mathematically modeled using a grid of triangles in the three-dimensional space (= tessellation). The corners of the triangles are termed ‘vertices’.
Demographic data are given in the left part. ACA, anterior cerebral artery; ACoA, anterior communicating artery; MCA, middle cerebral artery; PCoA; posterior communicating artery. The patch section shows the properties of the geometric mesh for each patient. The variations in total patch area in the first column reflect the individual variations of surface folding at a constant distance (30 mm) between electrodes and any vertex on the edge of a given patch. The second column contains the cortical thickness in the patch. The quality of the geometric discretization before and after the up-sampling is reflected by the vertex count in the third and fourth column, and in the mean triangle edge length in the fifth and sixth column, respectively. The hemisphere section shows individual differences in total surface area and cortical volume of the individual brain hemispheres from which the single patches were extracted. The ECoG section gives the number of all recorded and analyzed SDs of the 12 patients and those SDs with at least three active electrodes, which was required for the algorithm.
| No. | Age (years), sex | WFNS grade | Fisher grade | Location of aneurysm | Intervention | Focal brain lesion at electrode strip (either infarct or ICH) | Early focal brain lesion (days: 0–3) | Delayed focal brain lesion (days: 4–14) | Recording time [h] | Median SD velocity based on the reduced hit-sequences | Median interval to previous SD | PTDDD | Peak total number of SDs of a recording day | Peak total number of spreading depressions of a recording day | Peak total number of isoelectric SDs of a recording day | Patch | Hemisphere | ECoG | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area [cm2] | Thickness [mm] | Vertex count | Vertex count up-sampled | Mean edge length before up-sampling [mm] | Mean edge length after up-sampling [mm] | Area [cm2] | Volume [cm3] | Recorded SDs | Simulated SDs | ||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 56. f | 4 | 3 | MCA | Clipping | y | y | y | 287.1 | 4,11 | 34.8 | 300.5 | 36.1 | 36.1 | 5.0 | 74.95 | 2.32 ± 0.69 | 10,526 | 165,713 | 0.96 ± 0.41 | 0.24 ± 0.10 | 1194.43 | 662.51 | 189 | 129 |
| 2 | 50, f | 2 | 3 | PCoA | Clipping | n | n | y | 253.1 | 2,42 | 158.1 | 106.4 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 0.0 | 72.45 | 2.59 ± 0.62 | 9155 | 144,185 | 1.01 ± 0.43 | 0.25 ± 0.11 | 898.17 | 572.42 | 46 | 7 |
| 3 | 68, f | 4 | 3 | PCoA | Coiling | y | y | y | 258.7 | 5,1 | 27.0 | 1103.8 | 47.1 | 13.2 | 36.1 | 82.10 | 2.16 ± 0.71 | 9800 | 154,208 | 1.03 ± 0.43 | 0.26 ± 0.11 | 1041.34 | 513.65 | 150 | 86 |
| 4 | 50, f | 3 | 3 | ACoA | Clipping | y | y | y | 228.7 | 6,72 | 58.2 | 647.3 | 34.7 | 25.1 | 9.6 | 88.54 | 2.69 ± 0.85 | 10,185 | 159,765 | 1.05 ± 0.48 | 0.26 ± 0.12 | 1009.99 | 497.14 | 65 | 25 |
| 5 | 64, f | 4 | 3 | ACoA | Clipping | n | n | y | 278.2 | 3,2 | 136.2 | 158.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 1.0 | 68.70 | 2.87 ± 0.94 | 8502 | 133,719 | 1.01 ± 0.47 | 0.25 ± 0.12 | 9899.50 | 569.43 | 58 | 45 |
| 6 | 58, f | 1 | 3 | ACoA | Clipping | n | y | n | 287.3 | 3,84 | 19.8 | 389.6 | 37.1 | 24.7 | 12.4 | 70.80 | 2.76 ± 0.93 | 8623 | 135,421 | 1.03 ± 0.47 | 0.26 ± 0.12 | 9078.07 | 481.31 | 55 | 41 |
| 7 | 48, m | 5 | 3 | ACoA | Coiling | n | y | y | 303.8 | 2,43 | 408.5 | 206.5 | 20.1 | 20.1 | 0.0 | 73.24 | 2.80 ± 0.71 | 9091 | 142,921 | 1.02 ± 0.46 | 0.26 ± 0.11 | 1151.69 | 429.90 | 77 | 5 |
| 8 | 31, m | 2 | 3 | ACoA | Clipping | y | n | y | 202.1 | 2,6 | 61.6 | 410.0 | 20.9 | 20.9 | 5.1 | 79.79 | 2.47 ± 0.78 | 8720 | 136,796 | 1.09 ± 0.48 | 0.27 ± 0.12 | 1227.96 | 575.25 | 48 | 31 |
| 9 | 47, f | 4 | 3 | MCA | Clipping | y | y | y | 269.3 | 3,22 | 103.8 | 502.4 | 21.4 | 13.2 | 21.4 | 90.72 | 2.33 ± 0.75 | 10,745 | 169,058 | 1.02 ± 0.45 | 0.26 ± 0.11 | 1154.76 | 502.34 | 99 | 72 |
| 10 | 44, f | 4 | 3 | PCoA | Clipping | y | y | y | 239.9 | 3,28 | 31.8 | 1407.0 | 53.5 | 30.2 | 53.5 | 71.92 | 2.33 ± 0.77 | 8331 | 130,926 | 1.05 ± 0.46 | 0.26 ± 0.11 | 1041.35 | 397.84 | 174 | 124 |
| 11 | 70, f | 4 | 3 | ACA | Clipping | y | y | y | 245.1 | 2,47 | 138.3 | 184.3 | 8.1 | 8.1 | 4.0 | 75.48 | 2.66 ± 0.74 | 9306 | 146,379 | 1.02 ± 0.48 | 0.26 ± 0.12 | 9576.65 | 456.25 | 27 | 25 |
| 12 | 61, f | 1 | 3 | PCoA | Clipping | n | y | n | 256.1 | 3,18 | 267.2 | 179.0 | 12.1 | 12.1 | 7.1 | 72.46 | 2.59 ± 0.62 | 9155 | 144,185 | 1.01 ± 0.43 | 0.25 ± 0.11 | 8981.77 | 391.40 | 49 | 21 |
| 1037 | 611 (58.9%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
This table shows the number of successfully reconstructed SD events per subject and per combination of simulation parameters. R_diff represents the maximally allowed absolute difference for the curvature radius of a wave-front between any candidate in the preceding and any candidate in the succeeding sub-trajectory set. V_diff represents the maximum absolute velocity difference in otherwise the same way as R_diff does. A sub-trajectory set is related to the surface between a pair of consecutively activated electrodes in which the trajectory reconstruction is possible according to the propagation model. The upper half of the table labeled as ‘full hit-sequence’ contains SD reconstruction counts based upon the time-lags, so called TOADs, directly adopted from the ECoG recordings by the labeling of SD events. The lower half labeled as ‘reduced hit-sequence’ contains results based upon the hit-sequences with removed branches.
| Subject | Simulated SDs | R_diff = 1 | R_diff = 1 | R_diff = 1 | R_diff = 0.5 | R_diff = 0.5 | R_diff = 0.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full hit-sequences | |||||||
| 1 | 129 | 66 (51.2%) | 54 (41.9%) | 42 (32.6%) | 66 (51.2%) | 53 (41.1%) | 36 (27.9%) |
| 2 | 7 | 2 (28.6%) | 2 (28.6%) | 2 (28.6%) | 2 (28.6%) | 2 (28.6%) | 2 (28.6%) |
| 3 | 86 | 64 (74.4%) | 31 (36.0%) | 26 (30.2%) | 64 (74.4%) | 30 (34.9%) | 26 (30.2%) |
| 4 | 25 | 23 (92.0%) | 20 (80.0%) | 20 (80.0%) | 22 (88.0%) | 20 (80.0%) | 20 (80.0%) |
| 5 | 45 | 25 (55.6%) | 24 (53.3%) | 24 (53.3%) | 26 (57.8%) | 24 (53.3%) | 23 (51.1%) |
| 6 | 41 | 32 (78.0%) | 30 (73.2%) | 30 (73.2%) | 32 (78.0%) | 30 (73.2%) | 29 (70.7%) |
| 7 | 5 | 4 (80.0%) | 3 (60.0%) | 2 (40.0%) | 4 (80.0%) | 2 40.0%) | 2 (40.0%) |
| 8 | 31 | 30 (96.8%) | 29 (93.5%) | 26 (83.9%) | 30 (96.8%) | 28 (90.3%) | 26 (83.9%) |
| 9 | 72 | 27 (37.5%) | 25 (34.7%) | 20 (27.8%) | 27 (37.5%) | 25 (34.7%) | 20 (27.8%) |
| 10 | 124 | 67 (54.0%) | 65 (52.4%) | 61 (49.2%) | 67 (54.0%) | 64 (51.6%) | 60 (48.4%) |
| 11 | 25 | 15 (60.0%) | 13 (52.0%) | 12 (48.0%) | 15 (60.0%) | 13 (52.0%) | 12 (48.0%) |
| 12 | 21 | 19 (90.5%) | 18 (85.7%) | 18 (85.7%) | 19 (90.5%) | 18 (85.7%) | 18 (85.7%) |
| All | 611 | 374 (61.2%) | 314 (51.4%) | 283 (46.3%) | 374 (61.2%) | 309 (50.6%) | 274 (44.8%) |
| Reduced hit-sequences | |||||||
| 1 | 129 | 112 (86.8%) | 105 (81.4%) | 94 (72.9%) | 112 (86.8%) | 104 (80.6%) | 88 (68.2%) |
| 2 | 7 | 4 (57.1%) | 4 (57.1%) | 3 (42.9%) | 4 (57.1%) | 4 (57.1%) | 3 (42.9%) |
| 3 | 86 | 65 (75.6%) | 32 (37.2%) | 26 (30.2%) | 65 (75.6%) | 31 (36.0%) | 26 (30.2%) |
| 4 | 25 | 23 (92.0%) | 21 (84.0%) | 21 (84.0%) | 22 (88.0%) | 21 (84.0%) | 21 (84.0%) |
| 5 | 45 | 40 (88.9%) | 39 (86.7%) | 39 (86.7%) | 41 (91.1%) | 39 (86.7%) | 38 (84.4%) |
| 6 | 41 | 27 (65.9%) | 26 (63.4%) | 26 (63.4%) | 27 (65.9%) | 26 (63.4%) | 25 (61.0%) |
| 7 | 5 | 4 (80.0%) | 3 (60.0%) | 2 (40%) | 4 (80.0%) | 2 (40.0%) | 2 (40.0%) |
| 8 | 31 | 31 (100.0%) | 30 (96.8%) | 27 (87.1%) | 31 (100.0%) | 29 (93.5%) | 27 (87.1%) |
| 9 | 72 | 52 (72.2%) | 50 (69.4%) | 45 (62.5%) | 53 (73.6%) | 50 (69.4%) | 45 (62.5%) |
| 10 | 124 | 98 (79.0%) | 92 (74.2%) | 87 (70.2%) | 97 (78.2%) | 92 (74.2%) | 85 (68.5%) |
| 11 | 25 | 25 (100.0%) | 24 (96%) | 24 (96.0%) | 25 (100.0%) | 24 (96.0%) | 23 (92.0%) |
| 12 | 21 | 21 (100.0%) | 21 (100%) | 21 (100.0%) | 21 (100.0%) | 21 (100.0%) | 21 (100.0%) |
| All | 611 | 502 (82.2%) | 447 (73.2%) | 415 (67.9%) | 502 (82.2%) | 443 (72.5%) | 404 (66.1%) |
Fig. 2Simulations of SD trajectories using full-hit sequences. In the upper left corner, the processing pipeline up to the trajectory search is shown. In the upper right corner, the reconstructed surface of patient 1's brain is given including the subdural electrodes 1–6 and the patch around the electrodes. The next row demonstrates the trajectory search for three example SDs of patient 1 in the patch. Overlapping ‘could fit’ trajectories are color-coded as a heatmap in % relative to the total number of ‘could fit’ trajectories. This means that the higher the number of ‘could fit’ solutions including a given vertex on the brain surface for an electrode pair, the lighter the color of the respective vertex in the heatmap. In the lowest row, the original DC recordings of the three example SDs are given.
Fig. 3Simulation-estimated velocity based on the reduced hit-sequences. (A) Simple branching of SDs was frequently observed. For example in the upper SD, the full hit-sequence E2-E3-E4-E1-E5-E6 is a twin sequence starting at E2. From E2, one of the wave's branches hits E3-E4-E5-E6 and the other one E1. In cases of branching, we removed either the shorter branch or the one that occurred later when the two branches were of the same length. In this case, E1 was removed. For this reduced hit-sequence, the trajectory search was successful. The lower SD from the same patient shows a more complex type of branching. In this case, no trajectories were found for either full or reduced hit-sequences. This example SD is particularly interesting because the unique moment was recorded at which it subdivided and appeared in form of a double peak DC shift in E2. Such double peak DC shifts could be longer than 4 min, though they might not indicate local energy compromise. In the context of branching, we would like to refer previous videos of SDs in the gyrencephalic brain of swine in which this is visualized using IOS imaging (Santos et al., 2014, Scholl et al., 2017). Neuroimaging excluded in this case that E1, E2 or E3 sampled from two adjacent gyri. (B) Using laser speckle imaging of rCBF and IOS imaging in the operating room, Woitzik and colleagues recorded SD velocities between 1.7 and 9.2 mm/min in patients undergoing decompressive hemicraniectomy (Woitzik et al., 2013). These historical data were fitted here to normal distribution and are compared with the simulation-estimated velocities of spreading depressions and isoelectric SDs based on the reduced hit-sequences. (C) Frequency distributions of the simulation-estimated velocities for the reduced hit-sequences.
Fig. 4Statistical analyses of the simulation-estimated velocity based on the reduced hit-sequences. (A) A significant correlation of median velocity (based on the reduced hit-sequences) and median interval between SD and previous SD was found. (B) By contrast, there was no correlation of median interval between SD and previous SD with the median velocity based on an ideal linear spread along the recording strip (using the inter-electrode space of 10 mm). This is noteworthy because this type of velocity has been used in all previous COSBID publications that reported SD velocities to indicate the spread of the wave. Significant correlations of the median velocity (based on the reduced hit-sequences) were also found with (C) the PTDDD, (D) the peak number of SDs, (E) the peak number of spreading depressions and (F) the peak number of isoelectric SDs. (G) DC duration and DC rise time showed a strongly positive correlation when the medians were taken. (H) However, the correlation was even stronger using the pooled data which corresponds to the notion that the nature of this relationship is less complex than the relationship between SD velocity and susceptibility.
Fig. 5Comparison between recording areas undergoing structural damage (n = 7 patient) and recording areas distant from zones undergoing structural damage (n = 5 patients). (A) Among the standard variables recommended by the COSBID group (Dreier et al., 2017), a significant difference was found only for PTDDD. However, the statistical power of these tests was low. (B) Isoelectric SDs with DC shifts > 4 min were only observed in patients in whom the electrode strip was overlying either a primary or secondary focal brain lesion. This corresponds well with the animal literature (Hartings et al., 2017b). (C) The simulation based on the reduced hit-sequences failed to find possible SD trajectories in a significantly higher proportion of isoelectric SDs with DC shift durations > 4 min compared with the remaining SDs. (D) The third SD of three consecutive SDs in a cluster of isoelectric SDs with DC shift durations > 4 min is an example, taken from patient 10, that illustrates the statistical results in (C). The simulation failed to find possible SD trajectories in this SD, no matter whether full or reduced hit-sequences were used. The first three traces show short-lasting spreading ischemias in response to the SDs (Dreier et al., 2009). Regional CBF was measured with a subdural opto-electrode strip that allowed the simultaneous measurement of ECoG and rCBF using laser-Doppler flowmetry (Perimed AB, Järfälla, Sweden) (Dreier et al., 2009, Drenckhahn et al., 2016). Cerebral perfusion pressure results from the subtraction of the intracranial pressure (monitored via ventricular drainage catheter) from the mean arterial pressure (catheter in the radial artery). Tissue partial pressure of oxygen was recorded using an intraparenchymal sensor (Licox CC1P1, Integra Lifesciences Corporation, Plainsboro, NJ, USA) (Bosche et al., 2010, Dreier et al., 2009, Hinzman et al., 2014, Winkler et al., 2017). ** indicates that the P-value or probability value for the statistical comparisons given in the figure is < 0.01 when the null hypothesis is true; *** indicates that it is < 0.001 when the null hypothesis is true (cf. body text for the applied statistical tests).
Fig. 6Development of a delayed ischemic infarct after aSAH in patient 3. Upper: Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) shows an infarct in the posterior territory of the left middle cerebral artery (MCA) on day 3 (upper left image). On day 7, a new delayed ischemic infarct is visualized in the left anterior MCA territory including the recording area (lower left image). In the middle images, the ischemic lesions are marked in blue (A = early and B = delayed infarct). The blue regions of interest originate from DWI (b = 1000) images superimposed onto geometrically discretized (triangular mesh) whole brain taken as MPRAGE sequence from the same subject. The region of interest threshold was set at 2/3 of the maximum value. On the right side, the reconstructed brain surfaces are depicted. Also on the reconstructed cortical surfaces, the DWI lesions are marked in blue. The subdural recording strip was projected from a CT onto the cortical surface (yellow electrodes 1 to 6). Note that, apart from electrode 1, all electrodes overlay the new delayed infarct. Lower: DC/AC-ECoG recordings of the two initial SDs of a cluster that occurred on day 4 after aSAH between the two MRIs of days 3 and 7. Based on our knowledge of the electrophysiological signature of stroke in animal experiments, the cluster was presumably the correlate of the new infarct. Whereas the simulation found possible trajectories for the first SD, it failed to do so for the second one. This provides another example illustrating that the simulation did not find possible SD trajectories in a significantly higher proportion of isoelectric SDs with DC shift durations > 4 min compared with the remaining SDs. Also note that the SDs are superimposed on a negative ultraslow potential (red arrows) as explained recently (Dreier et al., 2017). Traces are similar to Fig. 5.