Literature DB >> 28947654

When the Lyon(ized chromosome) roars: ongoing expression from an inactive X chromosome.

Laura Carrel1, Carolyn J Brown2.   

Abstract

A tribute to Mary Lyon was held in October 2016. Many remarked about Lyon's foresight regarding many intricacies of the X-chromosome inactivation process. One such example is that a year after her original 1961 hypothesis she proposed that genes with Y homologues should escape from X inactivation to achieve dosage compensation between males and females. Fifty-five years later we have learned many details about these escapees that we attempt to summarize in this review, with a particular focus on recent findings. We now know that escapees are not rare, particularly on the human X, and that most lack functionally equivalent Y homologues, leading to their increasingly recognized role in sexually dimorphic traits. Newer sequencing technologies have expanded profiling of primary tissues that will better enable connections to sex-biased disorders as well as provide additional insights into the X-inactivation process. Chromosome organization, nuclear location and chromatin environments distinguish escapees from other X-inactivated genes. Nevertheless, several big questions remain, including what dictates their distinct epigenetic environment, the underlying basis of species differences in escapee regulation, how different classes of escapees are distinguished, and the roles that local sequences and chromosome ultrastructure play in escapee regulation.This article is part of the themed issue 'X-chromosome inactivation: a tribute to Mary Lyon'.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-chromosome inactivation; epigenetic regulation; escapee; inactive X chromosome; lupus; sexual dimorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28947654      PMCID: PMC5627157          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  134 in total

Review 1.  Escape Artists of the X Chromosome.

Authors:  Bradley P Balaton; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 2.  The human placental methylome.

Authors:  Wendy P Robinson; E Magda Price
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 3.  Genetic and epigenetic contribution to complex traits.

Authors:  Helena Kilpinen; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  46, X,X-X terminal rearrangement/45, X mosaicism in a child with short stature.

Authors:  D M Becroft; J M Costello; R L Shaw
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Hypothesis: the female excess in cranial neural tube defects reflects an epigenetic drag of the inactivating X chromosome on the molecular mechanisms of neural fold elevation.

Authors:  Diana M Juriloff; Muriel J Harris
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-07-02

6.  A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping.

Authors:  Suhas S P Rao; Miriam H Huntley; Neva C Durand; Elena K Stamenova; Ivan D Bochkov; James T Robinson; Adrian L Sanborn; Ido Machol; Arina D Omer; Eric S Lander; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Cancer incidence and mortality in men with Klinefelter syndrome: a cohort study.

Authors:  Anthony J Swerdlow; Minouk J Schoemaker; Craig D Higgins; Alan F Wright; Patricia A Jacobs
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences.

Authors:  Arjun Raj; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Chromosomes. A comprehensive Xist interactome reveals cohesin repulsion and an RNA-directed chromosome conformation.

Authors:  Anand Minajigi; John Froberg; Chunyao Wei; Hongjae Sunwoo; Barry Kesner; David Colognori; Derek Lessing; Bernhard Payer; Myriam Boukhali; Wilhelm Haas; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Epigenetic functions of smchd1 repress gene clusters on the inactive X chromosome and on autosomes.

Authors:  Anne-Valerie Gendrel; Y Amy Tang; Masako Suzuki; Jonathan Godwin; Tatyana B Nesterova; John M Greally; Edith Heard; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  The eXceptional nature of the X chromosome.

Authors:  Bradley P Balaton; Thomas Dixon-McDougall; Samantha B Peeters; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 2.  When the balance is broken: X-linked gene dosage from two X chromosomes and female-biased autoimmunity.

Authors:  Camille M Syrett; Montserrat C Anguera
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 4.962

3.  Preface.

Authors:  Edith Heard; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Activity and inactivity of moth sex chromosomes in somatic and meiotic cells.

Authors:  W Traut; V Schubert; M Daliková; F Marec; K Sahara
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Sex differences in cytokine profiles during suppressive antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Christophe Vanpouille; Alan Wells; Timothy Wilkin; Jyoti S Mathad; Sheldon Morris; Leonid Margolis; Sara Gianella
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.632

6.  Silencing Trisomy 21 with XIST in Neural Stem Cells Promotes Neuronal Differentiation.

Authors:  Jan Tomasz Czermiński; Jeanne Bentley Lawrence
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  Role of the Immune Microenvironment in SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Ye; Wen-Lin Hsu; Guan-Ru Peng; Wei-Chieh Yu; Wei-Chen Lin; SuiYun Hu; Shu-Han Yu
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 8.  New subtypes of allele-specific epigenetic effects: implications for brain development, function and disease.

Authors:  Stephanie N Kravitz; Christopher Gregg
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 7.070

9.  B cell-specific XIST complex enforces X-inactivation and restrains atypical B cells.

Authors:  Bingfei Yu; Yanyan Qi; Rui Li; Quanming Shi; Ansuman T Satpathy; Howard Y Chang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 66.850

10.  Methylation status of genes escaping from X-chromosome inactivation in patients with X-chromosome rearrangements.

Authors:  Sayaka Kawashima; Atsushi Hattori; Erina Suzuki; Keiko Matsubara; Machiko Toki; Rika Kosaki; Yukihiro Hasegawa; Kazuhiko Nakabayashi; Maki Fukami; Masayo Kagami
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 6.551

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.