Literature DB >> 28947471

SPR741, an Antibiotic Adjuvant, Potentiates the In Vitro and In Vivo Activity of Rifampin against Clinically Relevant Extensively Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Daniel V Zurawski1, Alexandria A Reinhart2, Yonas A Alamneh2, Michael J Pucci3, Yuanzheng Si2, Rania Abu-Taleb2, Jonathan P Shearer2, Samandra T Demons2, Stuart D Tyner2, Troy Lister3.   

Abstract

Acinetobacter baumannii is responsible for 10% of all nosocomial infections and has >50% mortality rates when causing ventilator-associated pneumonia. In this proof-of-concept study, we evaluated SPR741, an antibiotic adjuvant that permeabilizes the Gram-negative membrane, in combination with rifampin against AB5075, an extensively drug-resistant (XDR) A. baumannii strain. In standard in vitro assays and in a murine pulmonary model, we found that this drug combination can significantly reduce bacterial burden and promote animal survival despite an aggressive infection.
Copyright © 2017 Zurawski et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acinetobacter; ESKAPE pathogens; animal models; antibacterial; antibiotic adjuvants; antibiotic resistance; antibiotics; mouse model; pulmonary model; virulent strain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28947471      PMCID: PMC5700309          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01239-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


TEXT

Acinetobacter baumannii gained notoriety as the bacterial species most frequently isolated from U.S. soldiers from 2004 to 2010, with >3,500 infections associated with war wounds (1–4). Presently, A. baumannii is a significant problem worldwide because of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains and the aggressive nature of some infections causing ventilator-associated pneumonia (5–7). Recently, the World Health Organization cited a critical need for A. baumannii research because of increased drug resistance and lack of treatments (8). To address the immediate need, research strategies such as antibiotic adjuvants, which involve the current antibiotic armamentarium, may provide a faster path to clinical application. Antibiotic adjuvants are typically small molecules that sensitize a bacterium to clinically approved antibiotics (9). Specific examples with respect to A. baumannii include 2-aminoimidazole-based compounds, which disrupt two-component signaling (10), and anthracyclines, which potentiate activity of rifampin and linezolid (11). Here, we evaluated SPR741 (formerly NAB741), a polymyxin-B-derived molecule specifically designed to minimize the nephrotoxicity associated with this antibacterial class (12). SPR741 has reduced positive charge and lacks the highly lipophilic fatty-acid side chain present in polymyxins, which are the two structural features responsible for clinical nephrotoxicity (12, 13). As a proof of concept, we tested a combination of SPR741 and rifampin because colistin and rifampin have proven to be an effective combination in both mouse models and in patients (14–18). Rifampin was also previously tested against AB5075, a highly virulent XDR strain, in a murine pulmonary model of infection (19), which facilitated dosing for this study. First, the SPR741/rifampin combination was tested in vitro against A. baumannii. The MICs for SPR741 and rifampin were determined for AB5075 to be 128 μg/ml and 4.0 μg/ml, respectively, using standard CLSI methods in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) (20). This combination was assessed with the checkerboard method to determine fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) (21), where synergistic activity was defined by an FIC of ≤0.5 (22). The MIC of rifampin dropped from 4.0 to 0.5 μg/ml in the presence of 2.0 μg/ml SPR741, an 8-fold reduction, thus producing an FIC of 0.14 and indicating synergy. An isobologram was generated from these results (Fig. 1A).
FIG 1

(A) An isobologram generated from checkerboard assays where AB5075 was grown with increasing concentrations of SPR741 and rifampin. (B) Time-kill assay of SPR741, rifampin, and combinations against XDR-A. baumannii. AB5075 was grown overnight in CAMHB, then subcultured into CAMHB for 2 h. Cultures were inoculated 1:10 into CAMHB alone or with 2.0 μg/ml SPR741, 1.0 μg/ml rifampin, or both SPR741 and rifampin at their respective concentrations. Time points were taken at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 24 h, and samples were plated for CFU. Only the combination of rifampin and SPR741 was statistically significant (red line), as tested by two-way ANOVA (P = 0.0048).

(A) An isobologram generated from checkerboard assays where AB5075 was grown with increasing concentrations of SPR741 and rifampin. (B) Time-kill assay of SPR741, rifampin, and combinations against XDR-A. baumannii. AB5075 was grown overnight in CAMHB, then subcultured into CAMHB for 2 h. Cultures were inoculated 1:10 into CAMHB alone or with 2.0 μg/ml SPR741, 1.0 μg/ml rifampin, or both SPR741 and rifampin at their respective concentrations. Time points were taken at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 24 h, and samples were plated for CFU. Only the combination of rifampin and SPR741 was statistically significant (red line), as tested by two-way ANOVA (P = 0.0048). Next, we examined whether this synergy was applicable across the whole species of A. baumannii. We analyzed a previously described 28-strain diversity set (19) and determined MICs for all strains. A combination of 4.0 μg/ml of SPR741 and 1.0 μg/ml rifampin inhibited the growth of 96% of the strains, with a minimum 4-fold reduction of most MICs. AB3027 was the exception, as it is significantly resistant to rifampin (MIC > 128 μg/ml; Table 1).
TABLE 1

A. baumannii strains used in this study with individual MIC values

A. baumannii strainMIC fora:
Growth in presence of SPR741 (4.0 μg/ml) + rifampin (1.0 μg/ml)b
RifampinSPR741
AB9674<64
AB28282256
AB33402256
AB35604128
AB36382256
AB37854128
AB38062256
AB3927>256256+
AB40254128
AB40264>256
AB40274>256
AB40524256
AB42698>256
AB44484<64
AB44564128
AB44904128
AB44984256
AB47952128
AB48574256
AB48784256
AB493216<64
AB49574256
AB49914128
AB50014256
AB50752128
AB51974256
AB52564128
AB56742128
AB57114128

MICs were determined separately in the presence of the combination of SPR741 at 4.0 μg/ml and rifampin at 1.0 μg/ml.

−, no growth; +, growth.

A. baumannii strains used in this study with individual MIC values MICs were determined separately in the presence of the combination of SPR741 at 4.0 μg/ml and rifampin at 1.0 μg/ml. −, no growth; +, growth. To further evaluate activity, time-kill assays (3 biological replicates) were performed with 2.0 μg/ml SPR741 and 1.0 μg/ml rifampin against AB5075 grown in CAHMB as previously described (23). Each drug used alone had little effect on growth. In contrast, the combination resulted in fewer than 10 organisms (limit of detection) on LB plates at 2, 4, and 6 h (Fig. 1B), a significant result (two-way ANOVA, P = 0.0048). This result confirmed that the combination of SPR741/rifampin had a bactericidal, synergistic effect that should be further tested in vivo. The methods for the murine pulmonary model of A. baumannii infection were previously detailed (19), and were conducted similarly for this study. In pilot experiments, we initially evaluated three doses of SPR741 (40, 60, or 80 mg/kg) once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID), with 5.0 mg/kg or 10.0 mg/kg doses of rifampin also provided QD or BID. Only the BID-treated mice survived over the course of 1 week, suggesting that QD treatment was not sufficient (data not shown). Next, two independent experiments were conducted using 10 mice per group. Four hours after A. baumannii inoculation, groups were treated with sterile saline (negative control), 5.0 mg/kg rifampin, 60 mg/kg SPR741 BID, or the combination of SPR741 40 mg/kg or 60 mg/kg SPR741 with 5.0 mg/kg rifampin BID for the next 3 days. The survival rate for 60 mg/kg SPR741 combined with 5.0 mg/kg rifampin BID was 90% (Fig. 2A), a significant success for this aggressive infection model (Mantel-Cox test, P < 0.0027). In contrast, untreated animals or mice receiving SPR741 alone succumbed to infection (Fig. 2A). Rifampin alone only provided 50% survival (Fig. 2A).
FIG 2

(A) Mice were intranasally inoculated with 5.0 × 106 CFU AB5075 and treated with rifampin 5 mg/kg BID (green line), SPR741 60 mg/kg BID (yellow line), the combination of these doses at 40 mg/kg SPR741 BID (blue line) or 60 mg/kg SPR741 BID (red line), or sterile saline (vehicle alone, untreated control; black line). The data presented is a combination of two biological replicates of 10 mice/group for a total of 20 mice (n = 20). Mice were monitored daily for signs of morbidity and mortality. Results for all groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05) compared to each other via the Mantel-Cox test (Graphpad Prism), except for the untreated control (black line) and SPR741-alone groups (yellow line). (B) Box-and-whisker plots of log10 CFU/g of lung tissue on day 2 postinoculum. Mice were treated with rifampin at 5 mg/kg BID (green box), SPR741 60 mg/kg BID (yellow box), the combination of these doses (red box), or sterile saline (vehicle alone, control; black box) for 2 days. Boxes show median and interquartile ranges, while whiskers represent 95% confidence interval (CI). Groups were compared each day via the Mann-Whitney U test. ** represents P values of <0.01 (P = 0.0029). These data are pooled from two biological replicates with at least 6 mice per group and 13 to 16 mice total per test condition.

(A) Mice were intranasally inoculated with 5.0 × 106 CFU AB5075 and treated with rifampin 5 mg/kg BID (green line), SPR741 60 mg/kg BID (yellow line), the combination of these doses at 40 mg/kg SPR741 BID (blue line) or 60 mg/kg SPR741 BID (red line), or sterile saline (vehicle alone, untreated control; black line). The data presented is a combination of two biological replicates of 10 mice/group for a total of 20 mice (n = 20). Mice were monitored daily for signs of morbidity and mortality. Results for all groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05) compared to each other via the Mantel-Cox test (Graphpad Prism), except for the untreated control (black line) and SPR741-alone groups (yellow line). (B) Box-and-whisker plots of log10 CFU/g of lung tissue on day 2 postinoculum. Mice were treated with rifampin at 5 mg/kg BID (green box), SPR741 60 mg/kg BID (yellow box), the combination of these doses (red box), or sterile saline (vehicle alone, control; black box) for 2 days. Boxes show median and interquartile ranges, while whiskers represent 95% confidence interval (CI). Groups were compared each day via the Mann-Whitney U test. ** represents P values of <0.01 (P = 0.0029). These data are pooled from two biological replicates with at least 6 mice per group and 13 to 16 mice total per test condition. Separate experiments were then conducted to evaluate bacterial burden via CFU (CFU/g of lung tissue). Mice were sacrificed on day 2 before the untreated control animals succumbed to infection, as previously described (19). These results mirrored the survival results, where the combination of SPR741/rifampin decreased bacterial burden by 6.0 log10 CFU/g compared to the vehicle-alone control (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 2B). When comparing the combination of SPR741/rifampin to rifampin treatment alone, a 2.0-log10 reduction in burden was seen with the addition of SPR741, which was also statistically significant (Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.0029) (Fig. 2B). This investigation is a promising start with regard to in vivo safety and efficacy of SPR741 combinations against Gram-negative pathogens. In pilot experiments, more mice did succumb (80% survival) with 80 mg/kg BID doses of SPR741. The reason for this is unclear, but clearance and complete animal survival are difficult to achieve in this model. AB5075 is highly aggressive and bacteria reach high numbers in lung tissue, followed by dissemination into the bloodstream and colonization of other organs, including heart, spleen, and kidneys (4, 19). With regard to toxicity, previously presented results (P. Shastri and S. Coleman, ASM Microbe, Boston, MA, 16 to 20 June 2016) determined that the 60 mg/kg dose in mice scales to a human dose of approximately 200 to 400 mg. SPR741 demonstrated a no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) of >60 mg/kg/day in cynomolgus monkeys (S. Coleman, M. Bleavins, T. Lister, M. Vaara, and T.R. Parr, ASM Microbe, Boston, MA, 16 to 20 June 2016), while nephrotoxicity was observed at 12 mg/kg/day with polymyxin B. Spero Therapeutics recently completed SPR741 dosing in healthy volunteers (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03022175, ClinicalTrials registration no. NCT03022175). With these prior results and the data obtained from this proof-of-concept study, more preclinical investigations of SPR741-antibiotic combinations are warranted to evaluate efficacy against other bacterial species. Furthermore, animal models mimicking other clinical indications and evaluating pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) are also currently being pursued.
  20 in total

1.  Bacteria recovered from patients admitted to a deployed U.S. military hospital in Baghdad, Iraq.

Authors:  Heather C Yun; Clinton K Murray; Stuart A Roop; Duane R Hospenthal; Emmett Gourdine; David P Dooley
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 2.  Clinical and Pathophysiological Overview of Acinetobacter Infections: a Century of Challenges.

Authors:  Darren Wong; Travis B Nielsen; Robert A Bonomo; Paul Pantapalangkoor; Brian Luna; Brad Spellberg
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Emerging broad-spectrum resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii: Mechanisms and epidemiology.

Authors:  Anaïs Potron; Laurent Poirel; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 5.283

4.  Potentiation of Antibiotic Activity by a Novel Cationic Peptide: Potency and Spectrum of Activity of SPR741.

Authors:  David Corbett; Andrew Wise; Tara Langley; Kirsty Skinner; Emily Trimby; Stephen Birchall; Alain Dorali; Stephanie Sandiford; Jennifer Williams; Peter Warn; Martti Vaara; Troy Lister
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index as a measure of synergy.

Authors:  M J Hall; R F Middleton; D Westmacott
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Bactericidal in-vitro activity of beta-lactams and beta-lactamase inhibitors, alone or associated, against clinical strains of Acinetobacter baumannii: effect of combination with aminoglycosides.

Authors:  M L Joly-Guillou; D Decré; J L Herrman; E Bourdelier; E Bergogne-Bérézin
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Efficacy of monotherapy and combined antibiotic therapy for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia in an immunosuppressed mouse model.

Authors:  Joon Young Song; Hee Jin Cheong; Jacob Lee; Ah Kyeong Sung; Woo Joo Kim
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 5.283

8.  Efficacy of rifampin and its combinations with imipenem, sulbactam, and colistin in experimental models of infection caused by imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  María E Pachón-Ibáñez; Fernando Docobo-Pérez; Rafael López-Rojas; Juan Domínguez-Herrera; Manuel E Jiménez-Mejias; Andrés García-Curiel; Cristina Pichardo; Luis Jiménez; Jerónimo Pachón
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Identification of BfmR, a response regulator involved in biofilm development, as a target for a 2-Aminoimidazole-based antibiofilm agent.

Authors:  Richele J Thompson; Benjamin G Bobay; Sean D Stowe; Andrew L Olson; Lingling Peng; Zhaoming Su; Luis A Actis; Christian Melander; John Cavanagh
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 10.  A Review of Novel Combinations of Colistin and Lipopeptide or Glycopeptide Antibiotics for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Kimberly C Claeys; Anna D Fiorvento; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2014-12-05
View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens.

Authors:  David M P De Oliveira; Brian M Forde; Timothy J Kidd; Patrick N A Harris; Mark A Schembri; Scott A Beatson; David L Paterson; Mark J Walker
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  New Treatment Options against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections.

Authors:  Burcu Isler; Yohei Doi; Robert A Bonomo; David L Paterson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Assessment of the In Vivo Activity of SPR741 in Combination with Azithromycin against Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolates in the Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model.

Authors:  Sean M Stainton; Kamilia Abdelraouf; Luke Utley; Michael J Pucci; Troy Lister; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Outer Membrane Interaction Kinetics of New Polymyxin B Analogs in Gram-Negative Bacilli.

Authors:  Noushin Akhoundsadegh; Corrie R Belanger; Robert E W Hancock
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Antibacterial Activity of Metergoline Analogues: Revisiting the Ergot Alkaloid Scaffold for Antibiotic Discovery.

Authors:  Jarrod W Johnson; Michael J Ellis; Zoë A Piquette; Craig MacNair; Lindsey Carfrae; Timsy Bhando; Nikki E Ritchie; Paul Saliba; Eric D Brown; Jakob Magolan
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 6.  Causes of polymyxin treatment failure and new derivatives to fill the gap.

Authors:  Selena Chiu; Anna M Hancock; Bob W Schofner; Katherine J Sniezek; Nashaly Soto-Echevarria; Gabrielle Leon; Darshan M Sivaloganathan; Xuanqing Wan; Mark P Brynildsen
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.424

Review 7.  Antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and potential synthetic treatments.

Authors:  Junaid Ali; Qasim A Rafiq; Elizabeth Ratcliffe
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2018-02-05

Review 8.  Antibiotic resistance breakers: current approaches and future directions.

Authors:  Mark Laws; Ali Shaaban; Khondaker Miraz Rahman
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 16.408

9.  Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Drug Interaction Potential of SPR741, an Intravenous Potentiator, after Single and Multiple Ascending Doses and When Combined with β-Lactam Antibiotics in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Paul B Eckburg; Troy Lister; Susannah Walpole; Tim Keutzer; Luke Utley; John Tomayko; Ellen Kopp; Nicholas Farinola; Scott Coleman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline in October 2019.

Authors:  Mark S Butler; David L Paterson
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.