| Literature DB >> 28946664 |
Xin Ye1, Jin Huang2,3,4, Yong Zeng5, Lai-Xi Sun6, Feng Geng7, Hong-Jie Liu8, Feng-Rui Wang9, Xiao-Dong Jiang10, Wei-Dong Wu11, Wan-Guo Zheng12,13.
Abstract
Hexagonally ordered arrays of polystyrene (PS) microspheres were prepared by a modified air-water self-assembly method. A detailed analysis of the air-water interface self-assembly process was conducted. Several parameters affect the quality of the monolayer colloidal crystals, i.e., the colloidal microsphere concentration on the latex, the surfactant concentration, the polystyrene microsphere diameter, the microsphere polydispersity, and the degree of sphericity of polystyrene microspheres. An abrupt change in surface tension was used to improve the quality of the monolayer colloidal crystal. Three typical microstructures, i.e., a cone, a pillar, and a binary structure were prepared by reactive-ion etching using a high-quality colloidal crystal mask. This study provides insight into the production of microsphere templates with flexible structures for large-area patterned materials.Entities:
Keywords: colloidal crystal; colloidal microspheres; monolayer; self-assembly
Year: 2017 PMID: 28946664 PMCID: PMC5666456 DOI: 10.3390/nano7100291
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the air-water interface self-assembly method. (A) Drops of solution were applied on the wafer surface; (B) the wafer was spun to achieve a colloidal microsphere film; (C) the wafer with polystyrene (PS) microspheres was dipped slowly into deionized (DI) water. PS microspheres floated on the water surface; (D) PS microspheres self-assembled on the air-water interface when the surface tension was changed by using SDS; (E) a high-order colloidal crystal was transferred to the substrate.
Figure 2Colloidal crystals fabricated using PS microspheres with different concentrations. (A) 1 wt. %; (B) 2 wt. %; (C) 5 wt. %; (D) 10 wt. %. (Scale bar 1 μm. All colloidal crystals were already transferred to the substrate after the last step).
Figure 3Influence of SDS concentration on monolayer formation for low PS concentrations (upper row, 1 wt. %) and high PS concentration (lower row, 2 wt. %). The SDS concentrations were (A,D) non-SDS, (B,E) 2 wt. %, (C,F) 4 wt. %. (Scale bar 1 μm, all colloidal crystals had been transferred to the substrate after the last step). The insets are the relevant fast Fourier transformation (FFT) images.
Figure 4Monolayer colloidal crystals with different diameters. (A) 750 nm; (B) 520 nm; (C) 430 nm; (D) 250 nm; (E) 160 nm; (F) 80 nm. (Scale bar 1 μm. All colloidal crystals were already transferred to the substrate after the last step). (G) Large-scale monolayer colloidal crystals with different diameters. High-order monolayer colloidal crystals are visible in the photograph with a bright, uniform color.
Figure 5(A) Influence of defect precursors on monolayer colloidal crystal; (B) alignment boundary of monolayer and two layers. (Scale bar 3 μm).
Figure 6(A) Cone structure; (B) pillar structure; and (C) binary structure fabricated with reactive-ion etching (RIE) using colloidal crystals.