Literature DB >> 28944489

Using systematic review in occupational safety and health.

John Howard1, John Piacentino1, Kathleen MacMahon1, Paul Schulte1.   

Abstract

Evaluation of scientific evidence is critical in developing recommendations to reduce risk. Healthcare was the first scientific field to employ a systematic review approach for synthesizing research findings to support evidence-based decision-making and it is still the largest producer and consumer of systematic reviews. Systematic reviews in the field of occupational safety and health are being conducted, but more widespread use and adoption would strengthen assessments. In 2016, NIOSH asked RAND to develop a framework for applying the traditional systematic review elements to the field of occupational safety and health. This paper describes how essential systematic review elements can be adapted for use in occupational systematic reviews to enhance their scientific quality, objectivity, transparency, reliability, utility, and acceptability. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Keywords:  evidence integration; occupational safety and health assessment; systematic review; weight of evidence

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28944489     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  6 in total

1.  Blue-collar work and women's health: A systematic review of the evidence from 1990 to 2015.

Authors:  Holly Elser; April M Falconi; Michelle Bass; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2018-08-18

2.  Translation research in occupational safety and health: A proposed framework.

Authors:  Paul A Schulte; Thomas R Cunningham; Leslie Nickels; Sarah Felknor; Rebecca Guerin; Fred Blosser; Chia-Chia Chang; Pietra Check; Donald Eggerth; Michael Flynn; Christy Forrester; David Hard; Heidi Hudson; Jennifer Lincoln; Lauralynn T McKernan; Preethi Pratap; Carol M Stephenson; Donna Van Bogaert; Lauren Menger-Ogle
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Quantitative Measures of Physical Risk Factors Associated with Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Elbow: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David H Seidel; Dirk M Ditchen; Ulrike M Hoehne-Hückstädt; Monika A Rieger; Benjamin Steinhilber
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Applying Translational Science Approaches to Protect Workers Exposed to Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Paul A Schulte; Rebecca J Guerin; Thomas R Cunningham; Laura Hodson; Vladimir Murashov; Borsika Adrienn Rabin
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 5.  Challenges and recommendations on the conduct of systematic reviews of observational epidemiologic studies in environmental and occupational health.

Authors:  Whitney D Arroyave; Suril S Mehta; Neela Guha; Pam Schwingl; Kyla W Taylor; Barbara Glenn; Elizabeth G Radke; Nadia Vilahur; Tania Carreón; Rebecca M Nachman; Ruth M Lunn
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 5.563

6.  Systematic Reviews in Occupational Health and Safety: where are we and where should we go?

Authors:  Jos Verbeek; Stefano Mattioli; Stefania Curti
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 1.275

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.