| Literature DB >> 28943871 |
Rabindra K Mandal1, Young M Kwon1,2.
Abstract
Salmonella spp., one of the most common foodborne bacterial pathogens, has the ability to survive under desiccation conditions in foods and food processing facilities for years. This raises the concerns of Salmonella infection in humans associated with low water activity foods. Salmonella responds to desiccation stress via complex pathways involving immediate physiological actions as well as coordinated genetic responses. However, the exact mechanisms of Salmonella to resist desiccation stress remain to be fully elucidated. In this study, we screened a genome-saturating transposon (Tn5) library of Salmonella Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) 14028s under the in vitro desiccation stress using transposon sequencing (Tn-seq). We identified 61 genes and 6 intergenic regions required to overcome desiccation stress. Salmonella desiccation resistance genes were mostly related to energy production and conversion; cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; inorganic ion transport and metabolism; regulation of biological process; DNA metabolic process; ABC transporters; and two component system. More than 20% of the Salmonella desiccation resistance genes encode either putative or hypothetical proteins. Phenotypic evaluation of 12 single gene knockout mutants showed 3 mutants (atpH, atpG, and corA) had significantly (p < 0.02) reduced survival as compared to the wild type during desiccation survival. Thus, our study provided new insights into the molecular mechanisms utilized by Salmonella for survival against desiccation stress. The findings might be further exploited to develop effective control strategies against Salmonella contamination in low water activity foods and food processing facilities.Entities:
Keywords: Salmonella; Tn-seq; desiccation stress; genetic determinants; low water activity food
Year: 2017 PMID: 28943871 PMCID: PMC5596212 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01723
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Summary of Illumina sequencing reads.
| Input pool | 10,842,764 | 8,867,116 | 186,621 | 48.99 ± 0.99 | 20 |
| (IP) | (81%) | ||||
| Desiccation | 5,516,907 | 4,248,156 | 132,631 | 33.18 ± 0.13 | 18 |
| (OP) | (77%) |
Figure 1Overview of transposon sequencing. (A) Spearman correlation (R2) of Tn5 insertion raw reads frequency distribution between input pool and desiccation at the nucleotide level. X- and Y-axis are log transformed. (B) Overlay plot displays genome-wide Tn5 insertion distribution in input pool and desiccation at the nucleotide level (Table S1). (C) Cluster of orthologous group (COG) assigned to S. Typhimurium desiccation resistance genes using EggNOG 4.5 database. X-axis: Percentage of genes into each COG category and Y-axis: COG assignment. (C, Energy production and conversion; M, Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; O, Post-translational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones; P, Inorganic ion transport and metabolism; No ortho, No orthologous found; S, Function unknown; L, Replication, recombination and repair; U, Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; J, Translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis; K, Transcription; E, Amino acid transport and metabolism; EG, Amino acid transport and metabolism, Carbohydrate transport and metabolism; F, Nucleotide transport and metabolism; G, Carbohydrate transport and metabolism; T, Signal transduction mechanisms; and V- Defense mechanisms).
The protein coding genes of S. Typhimurium 14028S required for desiccation survival.
| STM14_4660 ( | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit epsilon | C | 1 [−5.16] {−10} |
| STM14_4661 ( | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit beta | C | 2 [−3.58] {−39} |
| STM14_4662 ( | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit gamma | C | 2 [−6.51] {−21} |
| STM14_4663 ( | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit alpha | C | 2 [−7.25] {−27} |
| STM14_4664 ( | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit delta | C | 2 [−5.97] {−10} |
| STM14_4665 ( | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit B | C | 2 [−4.32] {−5} |
| STM14_4666 ( | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit C | C | 2 [−5.11] {−13} |
| STM14_4667 ( | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit A | C | 2 [−7.01] {−25} |
| STM14_4668 ( | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit I | C | 2 [−0.44] {−4} |
| STM14_4723 ( | TDP-4-oxo-6-deoxy-D-glucose transaminase | E | 2 [−2.94] {−9} |
| STM14_2256 ( | integral membrane protein | EG | 2 [−2.16] {−23} |
| STM14_3075 ( | bifunctional GMP synthase/glutamine amidotransferase protein | F | 2 [−4.74] {−17} |
| STM14_4906 ( | triosephosphate isomerase | G | 1 [−5.39] {−10} |
| STM14_3964 ( | polynucleotide phosphorylase/polyadenylase | J | 2 [−2.68] {−32} |
| STM14_5241 ( | tRNA delta(2)-isopentenylpyrophosphate transferase | J | 1 [−5.64] {−22} |
| STM14_4008 ( | RNA polymerase factor sigma-54 | K | 1 [−5.08] {−18} |
| STM14_4722 ( | TDP-fucosamine acetyltransferase | K | 1 [−5.43] {−8} |
| STM14_3676 ( | site-specific tyrosine recombinase XerD | L | 2 [−3.7] {−11} |
| STM14_4196 ( | DNA adenine methylase | L | 1 [−4.2] {−20} |
| STM14_4750 ( | site-specific tyrosine recombinase XerC | L | 2 [−7.81] {−8} |
| STM14_0265 ( | zinc metallopeptidase | M | 1 [−7.81] {−18} |
| STM14_0838 | putative UDP-galactopyranose mutase | M | 2 [−3.78] {−31} |
| STM14_0839 | putative glycosyl transferase | M | 1 [−1.93] {−12} |
| STM14_0871 ( | peptidoglycan-associated outer membrane lipoprotein | M | 2 [−3.8] {−4} |
| STM14_2580 ( | mannosyl transferase | M | 2 [−6.95] {−40} |
| STM14_2589 ( | dTDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase | M | 1 [−6.81] {−49} |
| STM14_3163 ( | GTP-binding protein LepA | M | 2 [−2.33] {−17} |
| STM14_4656 ( | D-fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase | M | 2 [−5.37] {−26} |
| STM14_4724 ( | O-antigen translocase | M | 2 [−6.17] {−38} |
| STM14_0013 ( | molecular chaperone DnaK | O | 2 [−5.39] {−12} |
| STM14_0014 ( | chaperone protein DnaJ | O | 1 [−1.26] {−17} |
| STM14_0254 ( | PII uridylyl-transferase | O | 2 [−3.96] {−30} |
| STM14_2258 | putative inner membrane protein | O | 1 [−1.15] {−23} |
| STM14_3328 | putative inner membrane protein | O | 2 [−2.11] {−25} |
| STM14_3675 ( | thiol:disulfide interchange protein DsbC | O | 1 [−0.13] {−4} |
| STM14_0048 ( | pH-dependent sodium/proton antiporter | P | 2 [−7.98] {−15} |
| STM14_0688 ( | iron-enterobactin transporter ATP-binding protein | P | 1 [−4.21] {−10} |
| STM14_0689 ( | iron-enterobactin transporter permease | P | 2 [−4.67] {−5} |
| STM14_0690 ( | iron-enterobactin transporter membrane protein | P | 2 [−4.46] {−4} |
| STM14_4648 ( | transcriptional regulator PhoU | P | 2 [−3] {−8} |
| STM14_4649 ( | phosphate transporter subunit | P | 1 [−2.9] {−17} |
| STM14_4754 ( | magnesium/nickel/cobalt transporter CorA | P | 1 [−4.94] {−25} |
| STM14_0845 | putative glycosyl transferase | S | 1 [−0.41] {−18} |
| STM14_0872 ( | hypothetical protein STM14_0872 | S | 1 [0.64] {−4} |
| STM14_1486 | putative cytoplasmic protein | S | 2 [−3.08] {−20} |
| STM14_3164 ( | hypothetical protein STM14_3164 | S | 2 [−0.63] {−34} |
| STM14_3329 | putative inner membrane protein | S | 1 [−2.64] {−8} |
| STM14_4907 ( | hypothetical protein STM14_4907 | S | 1 [0.77] {−3} |
| STM14_5242 ( | RNA-binding protein Hfq | T | 1 [−0.57] {−6} |
| STM14_0870 ( | translocation protein TolB | U | 1 [−3.35] {−15} |
| STM14_1703 ( | type III secretion system apparatus protein | U | 2 [−0.58] {−1} |
| STM14_1705 ( | needle complex inner membrane lipoprotein | U | 2 [−3.47] {−10} |
| STM14_5122 | putative ABC-type bacteriocin/lantibiotic exporter | V | 1 [−0.6] {−86} |
| STM14_1487 | hypothetical protein STM14_1487 | No ortho | 2 [−1.59] {−3} |
| STM14_1490 ( | putative envelope lipoprotein | No ortho | 2 [−0.58] {−7} |
| STM14_1704 ( | type III secretion system apparatus protein | No ortho | 2 [−5.47] {−10} |
| STM14_2015 | hypothetical protein STM14_2015 | No ortho | 2 [−0.55] {−8} |
| STM14_3165 | hypothetical protein STM14_3165 | No ortho | 2 [NA] {NA} |
| STM14_4725 | 4-alpha-L-fucosyltransferase | No ortho | 2 [−2.36] {−23} |
| STM14_5120 | cation efflux pump | No ortho | 1 [−1.56] {−23} |
Ess, Essentiality based on Con-ARTIST; 1- Domain essential; 2, Entirely Essential; COG, Cluster of Orthologous Groups; log2FC, log2 fold change after read normalization in central 80% of gene; DUIC, difference of unique insertion count between input pool and desiccation in central 80% of gene; the more −ve more reduced is the fitness. COG annotations are similar as in Figure 1.
: Genes conditionally essential for in vitro osmotic (n), starvation (s) and oxidative stress (o) as shown in Figure .
The intergenic regions of S. Typhimurium 14028S required for desiccation survival.
| IG_STM14_3329 | 2,923,580 | 2,923,838 | 259 | 2 |
| IG_STM14_3165 | 2,782,023 | 2,782,225 | 203 | 2 |
| IG_STM14_3164 | 2,780,125 | 2,780,528 | 404 | 2 |
| IG_STM14_2257 | 1,971,827 | 1,971,958 | 132 | 2 |
| IG_STM14_1490 | 1,337,373 | 1,338,163 | 791 | 2 |
| IG_STM14_0255 | 253,521 | 253,756 | 236 | 2 |
2- Entirely essential as classified by Con-ARTIST pipeline.
Figure 2Phenotypic study of null mutants. (A) Box plot displays survival (%) of WT (S. Typhimurium, yellow) and mutants (red and green). Red and green color boxplot has mean survival (%) lower and greater than WT, respectively. Box represents first and third quartile, line inside the box is median and whisker shows minimum and maximum. Strain marked with an asterisk (*) have significantly different survival than the wild type. (Δ2014–ΔSTM14_2014, Δ5122–ΔSTM14_5122, and Δ5120–ΔSTM14_5120). (B–F) Presentation of Tn5 read coverage in input pool (red) and desiccation (green) produced using Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV; Thorvaldsdottir et al., 2013). Numbers in the square is read coverage.
Figure 3Venn diagram showing a comparison of S. Typhimurium desiccation resistance genes with other environmental stress resistance genes. Desiccation resistance genes compared with previously identified resistance genes (Mandal, 2016) during: (A) osmotic stress (3% NaCl in LB medium); (B) Starvation (starved for 12 days in PBS); (C) oxidative stress (1 mm hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in LB medium); and (D) all the four stressors.