| Literature DB >> 28943543 |
Yosuke Matsumoto1, Hisao Nagoshi2, Mihoko Yoshida1, Seiichi Kato3, Junya Kuroda2, Kazuho Shimura1, Hiroto Kaneko1, Shigeo Horiike2, Shigeo Nakamura3, Masafumi Taniwaki1,4.
Abstract
Objective It has been postulated that the normal counterpart of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is the follicular helper T-cell (TFH). Recent immunological studies have identified several transcription factors responsible for T-cell differentiation. The master regulators associated with T-cell, helper T-cell (Th), and TFH differentiation are reportedly BCL11B, Th-POK, and BCL6, respectively. We explored the postulated normal counterpart of AITL with respect to the expression of the master regulators of T-cell differentiation. Methods We performed an immunohistochemical analysis in 15 AITL patients to determine the expression of the master regulators and several surface markers associated with T-cell differentiation. Results BCL11B was detected in 10 patients (67%), and the surface marker of T-cells (CD3) was detected in all patients. Only 2 patients (13%) expressed the marker of naïve T-cells (CD45RA), but all patients expressed the marker of effector T-cells (CD45RO). Nine patients expressed Th-POK (60%), and 7 (47%) expressed a set of surface antigens of Th (CD4-positive and CD8-negative). In addition, BCL6 and the surface markers of TFH (CXCL13, PD-1, and SAP) were detected in 11 (73%), 8 (53%), 14 (93%), and all patients, respectively. Th-POK-positive/BCL6-negative patients showed a significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than the other patients (median OS: 33.0 months vs. 74.0 months, p=0.020; log-rank test). Conclusion Many of the AITL patients analyzed in this study expressed the master regulators of T-cell differentiation. The clarification of the diagnostic significance and pathophysiology based on the expression of these master regulators in AITL is expected in the future.Entities:
Keywords: BCL11B; BCL6; Th-POK; angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma; follicular helper T-cell
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28943543 PMCID: PMC5709626 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.8570-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intern Med ISSN: 0918-2918 Impact factor: 1.271
Findings of Biopsied Samples and Epstein-Barr Viral Infection of the 15 Patients with Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma.
| Patient | Age/ Sex | Biopsy location | Representative karyotype | EBER-ISH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61/M | Lymph node | ND | 46,XY | + |
| 2 | 68/F | Lymph node | t(1;14)(q21;q32.3) [3/21] | + | |
| 3 | 65/F | Lymph node | + | 46,XX | - |
| 4 | 57/F | Subcutaneous nodule | + | 47,XX,+3 [6/8] 48,idem,+?21[1/8] | - |
| 5 | 85/F | Lymph node | ND | 46,XX | - |
| 6 | 68/F | Skin/Lymph node | - (PB) | 46,XX,del(9)(q?),add(14)(q32) [1/20] | - |
| 7 | 81/F | Lymph node | ND | 46,XX | + |
| 8 | 70/M | Lymph node | NE | 47,XY,add(4)(q21),del(5)(q?),+add(6)(p11), del13(q?),add(15)(p11),add(19)(q13) [2/20] | + |
| 9 | 38/M | Lymph node | ND | 46,XY,add(1)(p11),add(4)(p11),add(8)(q24), del(9)(q?),11,add(14)(q32),15,add(18)(q21), add(19)(p13),add(21)(q22),-22,-22,+4mar [2] | - |
| 10 | 68/M | Lymph node | + | No metaphase | - |
| 11 | 64/F | Lymph node | ND | 47,XX,add(1)(q21),del(2)(q?),+der(7)(1;7)(q12;q32),add(10)(p11.2), add(13)(p11.2) [1/15] | - |
| 12 | 75/F | Lymph node | ND | 46,XX | - |
| 13 | 63/F | Skin | ND | ND | - |
| 14 | 83/F | Lymph node | ND | 46,XX,inv(9)(p24q21) [1/20] | - |
| 15 | 68/F | Lymph node | ND | No metaphase | - |
ND: no data, NE: not evaluable, PB: peripheral blood, EBER-ISH: Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA insitu hybridization
Figure.Typical results of the immunohistochemical analysis. All of the antigens except for CD45RA and CD8 were positive. A: Hematoxylin and Eosin staining, B: BCL11B, C: CD3, D: CD45RA, E: CD45RO, F: Th-POK, G: CD4, H: CD8, I: BCL6, J: CXCL13, K: PD-1, L: SAP. A-C: Patient 15, D-H: Patient 14, I-L: Patient 2
Clinical Characteristics of the 15 Patients with Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma.
| Patient | LDH (IU/L) | Ann Arbor Stage | PS | Extranodal sites | WBC (×104/μL) | Hb (g/dL) | Platelet count (×104/μL) | IgA(mg/dL) | PIAI | ATPI | Survival (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1682H | IVB | 0 | Pleural effusion Ascites | 35,200 | 5.5 | 28.4 | ND | H | H | 179 |
| 2 | 191 | IIISB | 0 | - | 9,400 | 9.9 | 35.8 | 528 | H | HI | 37 |
| 3 | 556H | IIISA | 0 | - | 7,100 | 11.3 | 13.2 | 373 | H | L | 145+ |
| 4 | 226 | IIISB | 0 | Skin | 9,000 | 9.7 | 4.2 | 168 | H | L | 74+ |
| 5 | 264H | IVA | 0 | Pleural effusion Hepatomegary | 7,100 | 6.6 | 1.8 | ND | H | HI or H | 9+ |
| 6 | 315H | IVA | 0 | Skin | 7,500 | 12.9 | 30.2 | 348 | L | L | 78+ |
| 7 | 242H | ND | 0 | ND | 6,600 | 10.2 | 14.7 | 1,292 | H | HI | ND |
| 8 | 193 | IIIA | 0 | - | 4,900 | 14.0 | 18.5 | 554 | L | LI | 110+ |
| 9 | 198 | IVB | 0-1 | - | 4,300 | 14.9 | 25.5 | 111 | L | L | 72+ |
| 10 | 238 | IIISA | 0 | Pancreas | 7,600 | 11.5 | 17.5 | 1,378 | L | HI | 93+ |
| 11 | 993H | IVB | 1 | Hepatomegary | 8,700 | 11.2 | 0.3 | 410 | H | LI | 4 |
| 12 | 477H | IVB | 4 | Bone marrow | 19,300 | 8.4 | 4.3 | 950 | H | H | 62+ |
| 13 | 277H | IVB | 0 | Skin | 7,280 | 10.5 | 27.3 | 423 | H | HI | 45 |
| 14 | 276H | IA | 0 | - | 8,200 | 14.9 | 15.9 | 367 | L | L | 33+ |
| 15 | 279H | IVB | 0 | Ileum | 6,300 | 11.1 | 17.1 | 70 | H | L | 52 |
PIAI: Prognostic Index for AITL (34), ATPI: AITL prognostic index (35), L: low-risk, LI: low-intermediate-risk, HI: high-intermediate risk, H: high risk, ND: no data
Results of the Immunohistochemical Analysis.
| T-cell | Effector T-cell | Th | TFH | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient | BCL11B | CD3 | CD45RA | CD45RO | Th-POK | CD4 | CD8 | BCL6 | CXCL13 | PD-1 | SAP | |||
| 1 | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | |||
| 2 | - | + | - | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | |||
| 3 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | |||
| 4 | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||
| 5 | + | + | - | + | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||
| 6 | + | + | - | + | - | + | - | + | - | + | + | |||
| 7 | + | + | - | + | - | + | - | + | - | + | + | |||
| 8 | - | + | - | + | - | + | - | + | + | + | + | |||
| 9 | - | + | - | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | + | |||
| 10 | - | + | - | + | - | + | - | + | - | - | + | |||
| 11 | - | + | - | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | |||
| 12 | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | |||
| 13 | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | |||
| 14 | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | |||
| 15 | + | + | - | + | + | - | + | - | + | + | + | |||
| positive rate (%) | 67 | 100 | 13 | 100 | 60 | 80 | 40 | 73 | 53 | 93 | 100 | |||