Literature DB >> 28940859

Dynamic functional connectivity and individual differences in emotions during social stress.

Michael J Tobia1, Koby Hayashi2, Grey Ballard2, Ian H Gotlib3, Christian E Waugh1.   

Abstract

Exposure to acute stress induces multiple emotional responses, each with their own unique temporal dynamics. Dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) measures the temporal variability of network synchrony and captures individual differences in network neurodynamics. This study investigated the relationship between dFC and individual differences in emotions induced by an acute psychosocial stressor. Sixteen healthy adult women underwent fMRI scanning during a social evaluative threat (SET) task, and retrospectively completed questionnaires that assessed individual differences in subjectively experienced positive and negative emotions about stress and stress relief during the task. Group dFC was decomposed with parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) into 10 components, each with a temporal signature, spatial network of functionally connected regions, and vector of participant loadings that captures individual differences in dFC. Participant loadings of two networks were positively correlated with stress-related emotions, indicating the existence of networks for positive and negative emotions. The emotion-related networks involved the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, cingulate cortex, anterior insula, and amygdala, among other distributed brain regions, and time signatures for these emotion-related networks were uncorrelated. These findings demonstrate that individual differences in stress-induced positive and negative emotions are each uniquely associated with large-scale brain networks, and suggest that dFC is a mechanism that generates individual differences in the emotional components of the stress response. Hum Brain Mapp 38:6185-6205, 2017.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional connectivity; negative affect; positive affect; stress; synchronization; temporal dynamics; tensor factorization; ventral PFC

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28940859      PMCID: PMC6866845          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  85 in total

Review 1.  The case for positive emotions in the stress process.

Authors:  Susan Folkman
Journal:  Anxiety Stress Coping       Date:  2008-01

2.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging phase synchronization as a measure of dynamic functional connectivity.

Authors:  Enrico Glerean; Juha Salmi; Juha M Lahnakoski; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2012-06-11

3.  Principal components of functional connectivity: a new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest.

Authors:  Nora Leonardi; Jonas Richiardi; Markus Gschwind; Samanta Simioni; Jean-Marie Annoni; Myriam Schluep; Patrik Vuilleumier; Dimitri Van De Ville
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Cortical rich club regions can organize state-dependent functional network formation by engaging in oscillatory behavior.

Authors:  Mario Senden; Niels Reuter; Martijn P van den Heuvel; Rainer Goebel; Gustavo Deco
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Multivariate Brain Prediction of Heart Rate and Skin Conductance Responses to Social Threat.

Authors:  Hedwig Eisenbarth; Luke J Chang; Tor D Wager
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Behavioral relevance of the dynamics of the functional brain connectome.

Authors:  Hao Jia; Xiaoping Hu; Gopikrishna Deshpande
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-09-25

7.  The neural correlates of trait resilience when anticipating and recovering from threat.

Authors:  Christian E Waugh; Tor D Wager; Barbara L Fredrickson; Doug C Noll; Stephan F Taylor
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Measures of emotion: A review.

Authors:  Iris B Mauss; Michael D Robinson
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2009-02-01

9.  Spontaneous physiological variability modulates dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Nikolaou; C Orphanidou; P Papakyriakou; K Murphy; R G Wise; G D Mitsis
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.019

Review 10.  Interoception and stress.

Authors:  André Schulz; Claus Vögele
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-20
View more
  15 in total

1.  Dynamic Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Connectivity Tensor Decomposition: A New Approach to Analyze and Interpret Dynamic Brain Connectivity.

Authors:  Fatemeh Mokhtari; Paul J Laurienti; W Jack Rejeski; Grey Ballard
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2018-12-26

Review 2.  Imaging stress: an overview of stress induction methods in the MR scanner.

Authors:  Hannes Noack; Leandra Nolte; Vanessa Nieratschker; Ute Habel; Birgit Derntl
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Preliminary development of a neuroimaging paradigm to examine neural correlates of relationship conflict.

Authors:  Julianne C Flanagan; Shayla Yonce; Casey D Calhoun; Sudie E Back; Kathleen T Brady; Jane E Joseph
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 2.376

4.  GAT-FD: An integrated MATLAB toolbox for graph theoretical analysis of task-related functional dynamics.

Authors:  Meng Cao; Ziyan Wu; Xiaobo Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  State and trait characteristics of anterior insula time-varying functional connectivity.

Authors:  Lorenzo Pasquini; Gianina Toller; Adam Staffaroni; Jesse A Brown; Jersey Deng; Alex Lee; Katarzyna Kurcyus; Suzanne M Shdo; Isabel Allen; Virginia E Sturm; Yann Cobigo; Valentina Borghesani; Giovanni Battistella; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Katherine P Rankin; Joel Kramer; Howard H Rosen; Bruce L Miller; William W Seeley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Dynamic visual cortical connectivity analysis based on functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Le Zhao; Weiming Zeng; Yuhu Shi; Weifang Nie; Jiajun Yang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  Pelvic Pain Alters Functional Connectivity Between Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Hippocampus in Both Humans and a Rat Model.

Authors:  Wenjun Yu; Xiaoyan Wu; Yunan Chen; Zhiying Liang; Jinxiang Jiang; Afzal Misrani; Yun Su; Yigang Peng; Jian Chen; Binliang Tang; Mengyao Sun; Cheng Long; Jun Shen; Li Yang
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-03

Review 8.  A narrative review of emotion regulation process in stress and recovery phases.

Authors:  Pablo Ezequiel Flores-Kanter; Luciana Moretti; Leonardo Adrián Medrano
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-06-08

9.  Commentary: Putting 'Emotional Intelligences' in Their Place: Introducing the Integrated Model of Affect-Related Individual Differences.

Authors:  Pablo Ezequiel Flores Kanter; Leonardo Adrián Medrano
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-02

Review 10.  Questions and controversies in the study of time-varying functional connectivity in resting fMRI.

Authors:  Daniel J Lurie; Daniel Kessler; Danielle S Bassett; Richard F Betzel; Michael Breakspear; Shella Kheilholz; Aaron Kucyi; Raphaël Liégeois; Martin A Lindquist; Anthony Randal McIntosh; Russell A Poldrack; James M Shine; William Hedley Thompson; Natalia Z Bielczyk; Linda Douw; Dominik Kraft; Robyn L Miller; Muthuraman Muthuraman; Lorenzo Pasquini; Adeel Razi; Diego Vidaurre; Hua Xie; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Netw Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.