Literature DB >> 28940082

Applicability and efficacy of diatom indices in water quality evaluation of the Chambal River in Central India.

Prateek Srivastava1, Sarika Grover2, Jyoti Verma3, Ambrina Sardar Khan2.   

Abstract

Diatom indices have gained considerable popularity in estimation of the trophic state and degree of pollution in lotic ecosystems. However, their applicability and efficacy have rarely been tested in Indian streams and rivers. In the present study, benthic diatom assemblages were sampled at 27 sites along the Chambal River in Central India. PCA revealed three groups of sites, namely, heavily polluted (HVPL), moderately polluted (MDPL), and least polluted (SANT). A total of 100 diatom taxa belonging to 40 genera were identified. Brachysira vitrea (Grunow) was the most abundant species recorded from the least polluted sites with an average relative abundance of 29.52. Nitzschia amphibia (Grunow) was representative of heavily polluted sites (average relative abundance 31.71) whereas moderately polluted sites displayed a dominance of Achnanthidium minutissimum (Kϋtzing) with an average relative abundance of 26.33. CCA was used to explore the relationship between diatom assemblage composition and environmental variables. Seventeen different diatom indices were calculated using diatom assemblage data. The relationship between measured water quality variables and index scores was also investigated. Most of the diatom indices exhibited strong correlations with water quality variables including BOD, COD, conductivity, and nutrients, particularly phosphate. Best results were obtained for TDI and IPS indices which showed a high level of resolution with respect to discrimination of sites on the basis of pollution gradients. Water quality maps for the Chambal River were hence prepared in accordance with these two indices. However, satisfactory results with respect to water quality evaluation were also obtained by the application of EPI-D and IGD indices. The present study suggests that TDI and IPS are applicable for biomonitoring of rivers of Central India. Diatom indices, which are simpler to use such as IGD, may be considered, at least for a coarser evaluation of water quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomonitoring; Canonical correspondence analysis; Chambal River; Diatom indices; OMNIDIA; Water quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28940082     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0166-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  12 in total

1.  Use of epilithic diatoms to evaluate water quality in the Karasu River of Turkey.

Authors:  Hasan Gurbuz; Ersin Kivrak
Journal:  J Environ Biol       Date:  2002-07

2.  Which group is best? Attributes of different biological assemblages used in freshwater biomonitoring programs.

Authors:  Vincent H Resh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Scientific derivation of environmental quality benchmarks for the protection of aquatic ecosystems: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Kenneth M Y Leung; Graham Merrington; Michael St J Warne; Richard J Wenning
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Estimating vertebrate, benthic macroinvertebrate, and diatom taxa richness in raftable Pacific Northwest rivers for bioassessment purposes.

Authors:  Robert M Hughes; Alan T Herlihy; William J Gerth; Yangdong Pan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Development of the Trophic Water Quality Index (TWQI) for subtropical temperate Brazilian lotic systems.

Authors:  Eduardo A Lobo; Marilia Schuch; Carla Giselda Heinrich; Adilson Ben da Costa; Adriana Düpont; Carlos Eduardo Wetzel; Luc Ector
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Using diatom indices for water quality assessment in a subtropical river, China.

Authors:  Xiang Tan; Fran Sheldon; Stuart E Bunn; Quanfa Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Water quality and pollution status of Chambal river in National Chambal Sanctuary, Madhya Pradesh.

Authors:  D N Saksena; R K Garg; R J Rao
Journal:  J Environ Biol       Date:  2008-09

8.  Temperature-dependent toxicities of four common chemical pollutants to the marine medaka fish, copepod and rotifer.

Authors:  Adela J Li; Priscilla T Y Leung; Vivien W W Bao; Andy X L Yi; Kenneth M Y Leung
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Assessing the water quality index of water treatment plant and bore wells, in Delhi, India.

Authors:  M K Chaturvedi; J K Bassin
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Application of diatom biotic indices in the Guadalquivir River Basin, a Mediterranean basin. Which one is the most appropriated?

Authors:  Gonzalo Martín; Julia Toja; Silvia Estela Sala; María de los Reyes Fernández; Isabel Reyes; María Adela Casco
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 2.513

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Biological Assessment and Rehabilitation of the World's Rivers: An Overview.

Authors:  Maria João Feio; Robert M Hughes; Marcos Callisto; Susan J Nichols; Oghenekaro N Odume; Bernardo R Quintella; Mathias Kuemmerlen; Francisca C Aguiar; Salomé F P Almeida; Perla Alonso-EguíaLis; Francis O Arimoro; Fiona J Dyer; Jon S Harding; Sukhwan Jang; Philip R Kaufmann; Samhee Lee; Jianhua Li; Diego R Macedo; Ana Mendes; Norman Mercado-Silva; Wendy Monk; Keigo Nakamura; George G Ndiritu; Ralph Ogden; Michael Peat; Trefor B Reynoldson; Blanca Rios-Touma; Pedro Segurado; Adam G Yates
Journal:  Water (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 3.103

2.  Freshwater diatom biomonitoring through benthic kick-net metabarcoding.

Authors:  Victoria Carley Maitland; Chloe Victoria Robinson; Teresita M Porter; Mehrdad Hajibabaei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.