Literature DB >> 21713475

Estimating vertebrate, benthic macroinvertebrate, and diatom taxa richness in raftable Pacific Northwest rivers for bioassessment purposes.

Robert M Hughes1, Alan T Herlihy, William J Gerth, Yangdong Pan.   

Abstract

The number of sites sampled must be considered when determining the effort necessary for adequately assessing taxa richness in an ecosystem for bioassessment purposes; however, there have been few studies concerning the number of sites necessary for bioassessment of large rivers. We evaluated the effect of sample size (i.e., number of sites) necessary to collect vertebrate (fish and aquatic amphibians), macroinvertebrate, and diatom taxa from seven large rivers in Oregon and Washington, USA during the summers of 2006-2008. We used Monte Carlo simulation to determine the number of sites needed to collect 90-95% of the taxa 75-95% of the time from 20 randomly located sites on each river. The river wetted widths varied from 27.8 to 126.0 m, mean substrate size varied from 1 to 10 cm, and mainstem distances sampled varied from 87 to 254 km. We sampled vertebrates at each site (i.e., 50 times the mean wetted channel width) by nearshore-raft electrofishing. We sampled benthic macroinvertebrates nearshore through the use of a 500-μm mesh kick net at 11 systematic stations. From each site composite sample, we identified a target of 500 macroinvertebrate individuals to the lowest possible taxon, usually genus. We sampled benthic diatoms nearshore at the same 11 stations from a 12-cm(2) area. At each station, we sucked diatoms from soft substrate into a 60-ml syringe or brushed them off a rock and rinsed them with river water into the same jar. We counted a minimum of 600 valves at 1,000× magnification for each site. We collected 120-211 diatom taxa, 98-128 macroinvertebrate taxa, and 14-33 vertebrate species per river. To collect 90-95% of the taxa 75-95% of the time that were collected at 20 sites, it was necessary to sample 11-16 randomly distributed sites for vertebrates, 13-17 sites for macroinvertebrates, and 16-18 sites for diatoms. We conclude that 12-16 randomly distributed sites are needed for cost-efficient sampling of vertebrate richness in the main stems of our study rivers, but 20 sites markedly underestimates the species richness of benthic macroinvertebrates and diatoms in those rivers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21713475     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-011-2181-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  5 in total

1.  Effects of sample standardization on mean species detectabilities and estimates of relative differences in species richness among assemblages.

Authors:  Yong Cao; Charles P Hawkins; David P Larsen; John Van Sickle
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Sampling effort needed to estimate condition and species richness in the Ohio river, USA.

Authors:  Karen Blocksom; Erich Emery; Jeff Thomas
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-07-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world.

Authors:  M Dynesius; C Nilsson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.

Authors:  David Dudgeon; Angela H Arthington; Mark O Gessner; Zen-Ichiro Kawabata; Duncan J Knowler; Christian Lévêque; Robert J Naiman; Anne-Hélène Prieur-Richard; Doris Soto; Melanie L J Stiassny; Caroline A Sullivan
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-12-12

5.  Fish invasions in the world's river systems: when natural processes are blurred by human activities.

Authors:  Fabien Leprieur; Olivier Beauchard; Simon Blanchet; Thierry Oberdorff; Sébastien Brosse
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 8.029

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Towards a protocol for stream macroinvertebrate sampling in China.

Authors:  Li Li; Lusan Liu; Robert M Hughes; Yong Cao; Xing Wang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  The role of physical habitat and sampling effort on estimates of benthic macroinvertebrate taxonomic richness at basin and site scales.

Authors:  Déborah R O Silva; Raphael Ligeiro; Robert M Hughes; Marcos Callisto
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Applicability and efficacy of diatom indices in water quality evaluation of the Chambal River in Central India.

Authors:  Prateek Srivastava; Sarika Grover; Jyoti Verma; Ambrina Sardar Khan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Sampling Efforts for Estimating Fish Species Richness in Western USA River Sites.

Authors:  Robert M Hughes; Alan T Herlihy; David V Peck
Journal:  Limnologica       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.093

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.