| Literature DB >> 28939867 |
Gema L Batanero1, Elizabeth León-Palmero1, Linlin Li2, Andy J Green3, Manuel Rendón-Martos4, Curtis A Suttle5, Isabel Reche6.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28939867 PMCID: PMC5610251 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12462-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Images of the saline lake studied (Fuente de Piedra, Málaga, Spain). (a) Orthophoto (http://ws041.juntadeandalucia.es/medioambiente/dlidar/index.action) showing the flamingo nesting area, and (b) frequency of inundation area of the lake obtained from Landsat imagery (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/) for the wet and the dry hydrological years. Images of similar dates were used to calculate the inundation frequency for each pixel, which ranged from 0 (i.e. lake surface dry in all 9 images) to 9 (i.e. inundated in all 9 images). The location of the two sampling stations is shown in red dots.
Figure 2Changes in salinity and abundance of flamingos. Flamingo abundance is shown by the purple line and salinity by the blue-green line. The wet hydrological year is shaded in blue and the dry hydrological year in cream. The lake dried out completely during the period shaded in brown. The periods of flamingo breeding are marked on the x-axis.
Mean values and ranges (in parentheses) of basic physicochemical and biological variables in the two sampling stations during the wet and dry hydrological years.
| Station Localization | Hydrological year | Rain (mm) | Temperature (°C) | Salinity (ppt) | pH | DOC (mmol-Cl−1) | TN (mmol-Nl−1) | TP (μmol-Pl−1) | TN:TP (Molar) | TDN (mmol-Nl−1) | SRP (μmol-Pl−1) | Chl a (μg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Station 1 37°06′19.8″N 4°45′44.5″W | 2010–2011 Wet | 563.3 | 19.1 (8.3–29.4) | 38.3 (18.1–88.3) | 9.03 (8.04–9.94) | 1.99 (1.07–4.72) | 0.22 (0.08–0.48) | 5.12 (1.38–11.52) | 52 (30–93) | 0.18 (0.06–0.48) | 0.41 (0.18–1.61) | 44.2 (2.4–111.9) |
| 2011–2012 Dry | 345.1 | 17.6 (9.3–25.6) | 112.5 (70.3–199.0) | 8.96 (7.46–9.06) | 6.19 (3.85–13.59) | 0.60 (0.32–1.17) | 13.82 (5.78–38.60) | 49 (24–85) | 0.28 (0.07–0.80) | 0.57 (0.18–1.63) | 44.9 (14.5–73.3) | |
| Station 2 37°05′07.4″N 4°47′08.3″W | 2010–2011 Wet | 563.3 | 19.7 (8.2–33.5) | 41.6 (21.4–91.8) | 9.03 (8.04–9.94) | 1.98 (1.00–4.73) | 0.22 (0.06–0.49) | 4.57 (1.59–10.20) | 50 (32–79) | 0.18 (0.06–0.46) | 0.47 (0.18–1.54) | 20.7 (3.9–50.0) |
| 2011–2012 Dry | 345.1 | 19.7 (8.3–33.5) | 109.9 (67.7–188.0) | 8.26 (7.61–8.99) | 6.03 (3.79–10.02) | 0.57 (0.35–0.83) | 11.40 (5.60–23.93) | 55 (30–98) | 0.28 (0.07–0.74) | 0.90 (0.22–0.91) | 58.4 (23.1–116.1) |
Figure 3Nutrient dynamics during two hydrological years. Changes in the concentration of (a) dissolved organic carbon, (b) total phosphorus, (c) total nitrogen, (d) total dissolved phosphorus, (e) soluble reactive phosphorus and (f) total dissolved nitrogen at station 1 (black dots) and station 2 (grey dots). Salinity (blue-green line) or flamingo abundance (purple line) are shown for reference.
Results of multiple regression analyses to assess the influence of flamingo abundance and water level on the concentrations of soluble reactive phosphorus and total dissolved nitrogen.
| Independent Variables | Soluble Reactive Phosphorus (μmol-P l−1) | Total Dissolved Nitrogen (mmol-N l−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| p- |
|
| p- | |
| Flamingos | 0.368787 | 0.000007 | 0.002964 | — | — | — |
| Water level (cm) | −0.422263 | −0.004579 | 0.000746 | −0.422129 | −0.002525 | 0.000868 |
| Intercept | 0.681651 | 0.000000 | 0.390625 | 0.000000 | ||
The r values are partial correlation coefficients, b is the non-standardized regression coefficients.
Figure 4Microbial dynamics during two hydrological years. Changes in (a) chlorophyll a concentration, (b) prokaryotic heterotrophic production, (c) prokaryotic abundance, and (d) virus abundance at station 1 (black dots) and station 2 (grey dots). Flamingo abundance (purple line) is shown for reference.
Results of multiple regression analyses to assess the influence of flamingo abundance and salinity on the concentration of viruses in Fuente de Piedra lake.
| Independent Variables | Virus abundance (ml−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| p- | |
| Flamingos | 0.548973 | 12.7 | 0.002028 |
| Salinity (ppt) | 0.506379 | 4634.3 | 0.004089 |
| Intercept | 243837.9 | 0.180274 | |
The r values are partial correlation coefficients, b is the non-standardized regression coefficients.
Figure 5Cross-correlations of flamingos and the microbial and total dissolved nitrogen dynamics. The zero line represents a synchronous effect and the negative numbers represent time-lag effects at different intervals. The analyses were performed for (a) prokaryotic heterotrophic production, (b) prokaryotic heterotrophic abundance, (c) virus abundance and (d) total dissolved nitrogen. Significant positive effects are represented by black bars that exceed the 0.5 level on the x axis.
Means and standard deviations (±SD) of total nitrogen (TN), total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), total phosphorus (TP), total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), total organic carbon (TOC), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in mg per g of feces in dry weight and the molar TN: TP ratios in the feces of the greater flamingo (Phoenicopterus roseus) and other waterfowl.
| Waterbirds | TN mg-N g−1 (mmol-N g−1) | TDN mg-N g−1 (mmol-N g−1) | TP mg-P g−1 (mmol-P g−1) | TDP mg-P g−1 (mmol-P g−1) | TOC mg-C g−1 (mmol-C g−1) | DOC mg-C g−1 (mmol-C g−1) | TN: TP (Molar) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 28.78 ± 1.42 (2.05 ± 0.10) | 24.83 ± 4.53 (1.77 ± 0.32) (86%) | 2.06 ± 0.98 (0.07 ± 0.03) | 0.45 ± 0.05 (0.01 ± 0.00) (19%) | 125.77 ± 0.55 (10.48 ± 0.04) | 106.97 ± 0.76 (8.91 ± 0.06) | 29 | This study |
|
| 45.15 ± 1.80 (3.22 ± 0.12) | 29.55 ± 5.41 (2.11 ± 0.38) (66%) | 3.38 ± 0.37 (0.11 ± 0.01) | 0.77 ± 0.03 (0.02 ± 0.00) (20%) | 127.25 ± 3.15 (10.60 ± 0.26) | 112.97 ± 0.14 (9.41 ± 0.01) | 29 | This study |
|
| 11 ± 2 (0.8 ± 0.1) | — | 3.3 ± 0.2 (0.1 ± 0.0) | — | 450.5 ± 3.5 (37.5 ± 0.3) | — | 7.5 | Van Gueest |
|
| 182.5 (13.03) | — | 37.5 (1.21) | — | — | — | 10.7 | Smith & Johnson[ |
|
| 32.8 (2.3) | — | 143.2 (4.6) | — | — | — | 0.6 | Marion |
|
| 42.1 (3.0) | — | 114.7 (3.7) | — | — | — | 0.8 | Marion |
|
| 241.3 (17.2) | — | 20.9 (0.7) | — | — | — | 25 | Hutchinson[ |
Two types of feces (brown and pink) were analyzed and are likely to be associated with different food sources. Dissolved nutrient solubilized from feces (TDN, and TDP) were calculated as the percentage (%) of the total (TN and TP).
Figure 6Experiments on the growth of heterotrophic prokaryotes with addition of flamingo guano. Changes in heterotrophic abundance and production during the period of incubation, and the concentration of soluble reactive phosphorus at the beginning (t0) and end (tf) of (a) experiment 1 and (b) experiment 2. Blue represents the treatment with the control conditions and red the treatment with addition of fresh guano from flamingo chicks.