Literature DB >> 28939617

J Curve in Patients Randomly Assigned to Different Systolic Blood Pressure Targets: An Experimental Approach to an Observational Paradigm.

Deborah N Kalkman1, Tom F Brouwer2, Jim T Vehmeijer2, Wouter R Berger2, Reinoud E Knops2, Robbert J de Winter2, Ron J Peters2, Bert-Jan H van den Born2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low systolic blood pressure (SBP) values are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, giving rise to the so-called J-curve phenomenon. We assessed the association between on-treatment SBP levels, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality in patients randomized to different SBP targets.
METHODS: Data from 2 large randomized trials that randomly allocated hypertensive patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease to intensive (SBP<120 mm Hg) or conventional (SBP<140 mm Hg) treatment were pooled and harmonized for outcomes and follow-up duration. Using natural cubic splines, we plotted the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events against the mean on-treatment SBP per treatment group.
RESULTS: The pooled data consisted of 194 875 on-treatment SBP measurements in 13 946 patients (98.9%). During a median follow-up of 3.3 years, cardiovascular events occurred in 1014 patients (7.3%), and 502 patients died (3.7%). For both blood pressure targets, an identical shape of the J curve was present, with a nadir for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality just below the SBP target. Patients in the lowest SBP stratum were older, had a higher body mass index, smoked more often, and had a higher frequency of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular events.
CONCLUSIONS: Low on-treatment SBP levels are associated with increased cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. This association is independent of the attained blood pressure level because the J curve aligns with the SBP target. Our results suggest that the benefit or risk associated with intensive blood pressure-lowering treatment can be established only via randomized clinical trials. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01206062 and NCT00000620.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; cardiovascular system; diabetes mellitus; hypertension

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28939617     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  11 in total

1.  Blood Pressure and Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Older Patients Initiating Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Tara I-Hsin Chang; Sai Liu; Medha Airy; Jingbo Niu; Mintu P Turakhia; Jennifer E Flythe; Maria E Montez-Rath; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  2022 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology and the Taiwan Hypertension Society for the Management of Hypertension.

Authors:  Tzung-Dau Wang; Chern-En Chiang; Ting-Hsing Chao; Hao-Min Cheng; Yen-Wen Wu; Yih-Jer Wu; Yen-Hung Lin; Michael Yu-Chih Chen; Kwo-Chang Ueng; Wei-Ting Chang; Ying-Hsiang Lee; Yu-Chen Wang; Pao-Hsien Chu; Tzu-Fan Chao; Hsien-Li Kao; Charles Jia-Yin Hou; Tsung-Hsien Lin
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 1.800

3.  Clinical benefit of systolic blood pressure within the target range among patients with or without diabetes mellitus: a propensity score-matched analysis of two randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Chao Li; Kangyu Chen; Guoshuai Shi; Rui Shi; Zhenqiang Wu; Xiaodan Yuan; Vicky Watson; Zhixin Jiang; Hui Mai; Tian Yang; Duolao Wang; Tao Chen
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 11.150

4.  Diastolic Blood Pressure and the J-Curve-Causal Effect or Confounding?

Authors:  Sydney E Hartsell; Srinivasan Beddhu
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-10-01

5.  Response by Beddhu et al to Letters Regarding Article, "Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on Effects of Intensive Compared With Standard Blood Pressure Control".

Authors:  Srinivasan Beddhu; Glenn M Chertow; Alfred K Cheung; William C Cushman; Tom Greene; Guo Wei; Robert Boucher; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on the Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Lowering on the Risk of Stroke.

Authors:  Saeed Shihab; Robert E Boucher; Nikita Abraham; Guo Wei; Srinivasan Beddhu
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 9.897

7.  J-curve Phenomenon Might Be Inherent: How to Know If It Is Treatment Induced?

Authors:  Jinho Shin
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.243

8.  Evaluation of Optimal Diastolic Blood Pressure Range Among Adults With Treated Systolic Blood Pressure Less Than 130 mm Hg.

Authors:  Jingen Li; Virend K Somers; Xiang Gao; Zhuo Chen; Jianqing Ju; Qian Lin; Essa A Mohamed; Shahid Karim; Hao Xu; Lijing Zhang
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

9.  Initial Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Decline and Long-Term Renal Function During Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT and ACCORD-BP Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Didier Collard; Tom F Brouwer; Rik H G Olde Engberink; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Liffert Vogt; Bert-Jan H van den Born
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Blood pressure lowering treatment and the Framingham score: Do not fear risk.

Authors:  Tom F Brouwer; Didier Collard; Bert-Jan H van den Born
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.