Literature DB >> 28938830

Perspective: Differential dynamic microscopy extracts multi-scale activity in complex fluids and biological systems.

Roberto Cerbino1, Pietro Cicuta2.   

Abstract

Differential dynamic microscopy (DDM) is a technique that exploits optical microscopy to obtain local, multi-scale quantitative information about dynamic samples, in most cases without user intervention. It is proving extremely useful in understanding dynamics in liquid suspensions, soft materials, cells, and tissues. In DDM, image sequences are analyzed via a combination of image differences and spatial Fourier transforms to obtain information equivalent to that obtained by means of light scattering techniques. Compared to light scattering, DDM offers obvious advantages, principally (a) simplicity of the setup; (b) possibility of removing static contributions along the optical path; (c) power of simultaneous different microscopy contrast mechanisms; and (d) flexibility of choosing an analysis region, analogous to a scattering volume. For many questions, DDM has also advantages compared to segmentation/tracking approaches and to correlation techniques like particle image velocimetry. The very straightforward DDM approach, originally demonstrated with bright field microscopy of aqueous colloids, has lately been used to probe a variety of other complex fluids and biological systems with many different imaging methods, including dark-field, differential interference contrast, wide-field, light-sheet, and confocal microscopy. The number of adopting groups is rapidly increasing and so are the applications. Here, we briefly recall the working principles of DDM, we highlight its advantages and limitations, we outline recent experimental breakthroughs, and we provide a perspective on future challenges and directions. DDM can become a standard primary tool in every laboratory equipped with a microscope, at the very least as a first bias-free automated evaluation of the dynamics in a system.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28938830     DOI: 10.1063/1.5001027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  9 in total

1.  Image windowing mitigates edge effects in Differential Dynamic Microscopy.

Authors:  Fabio Giavazzi; Paolo Edera; Peter J Lu; Roberto Cerbino
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 1.890

2.  Reshaping sub-millimetre bubbles from spheres to tori.

Authors:  Xujun Zhang; Shane Jacobeen; Qiang Zhang; Brian Khau; Peter Yunker; H Jerry Qi; Saad Bhamla; Paul S Russo
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Phenotyping ciliary dynamics and coordination in response to CFTR-modulators in Cystic Fibrosis respiratory epithelial cells.

Authors:  M Chioccioli; L Feriani; J Kotar; P E Bratcher; P Cicuta
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Reduced Salivary Mucin Binding and Glycosylation in Older Adults Influences Taste in an In Vitro Cell Model.

Authors:  Rose-Anna G Pushpass; Nicola Pellicciotta; Charles Kelly; Gordon Proctor; Guy H Carpenter
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Myosin-driven actin-microtubule networks exhibit self-organized contractile dynamics.

Authors:  Gloria Lee; Gregor Leech; Michael J Rust; Moumita Das; Ryan J McGorty; Jennifer L Ross; Rae M Robertson-Anderson
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  The modern structurator: increased performance for calculating the structure function.

Authors:  Mojtaba Norouzisadeh; Mohammed Chraga; Giovanni Cerchiari; Fabrizio Croccolo
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 1.890

7.  Optical-Tweezers-integrating-Differential-Dynamic-Microscopy maps the spatiotemporal propagation of nonlinear strains in polymer blends and composites.

Authors:  Karthik R Peddireddy; Ryan Clairmont; Philip Neill; Ryan McGorty; Rae M Robertson-Anderson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Formation of a transient amorphous solid in low density aqueous charged sphere suspensions.

Authors:  Ran Niu; Sabrina Heidt; Ramsia Sreij; Riande I Dekker; Maximilian Hofmann; Thomas Palberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Responsive core-shell DNA particles trigger lipid-membrane disruption and bacteria entrapment.

Authors:  Michal Walczak; Ryan A Brady; Leonardo Mancini; Claudia Contini; Roger Rubio-Sánchez; William T Kaufhold; Pietro Cicuta; Lorenzo Di Michele
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.