Literature DB >> 28938745

A closer look at expanded carrier screening from a PGD perspective.

Carolina Vaz-de-Macedo1,2,3, Joyce Harper4.   

Abstract

Conventionally, the search for carrier status was based on ethnicity and/or family history and targeted to a restricted number of genetic conditions and mutations. This is now being replaced by extended panels testing for hundreds of genetic disorders with a broad range of phenotypes, in what is called 'expanded carrier screening'. While the ultimate aim of these panels is to increase the reproductive autonomy of the individuals and couples by providing preconception knowledge that could lead to the broadest range of available options, including PGD, we argue that: (i) Given the number and heterogeneity of the conditions included in panels, it cannot be guaranteed that a couple who tests positive for one of those conditions will be eligible for PGD; patients should be informed of this potential limitation before undertaking screening. (ii) Family history is typically lacking in couples identified through panels as being at high-risk for certain disorders. This should promote a reflection on the inclusion of personal experience with a condition as a consideration for PGD in disorders with incomplete penetrance or for which treatment options are available. (iii) With the advent of next-generation sequencing panels, cases of couples in which one member carries a disease-causing variant and the other has a variant of uncertain significance found in the same gene are likely to become more common and need to be discussed from the PGD perspective. (iv) With comprehensive panels where healthy individuals are likely to be identified as carriers for several conditions, testing of carrier status for embryos and prioritisation of the embryos to transfer needs reassessing. We believe that these points should be included in the discussion on expanded carrier screening and that all stakeholders, patients included, must be aware of the challenges and limitations that may come with a positive result.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PGD; carrier screening panels; expanded carrier screening; reproductive autonomy; reproductive choice

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28938745     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

Review 1.  The use of expanded carrier screening of gamete donors.

Authors:  Molly R Payne; Anne-Bine Skytte; Joyce C Harper
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.353

2.  Assessment of willingness to pay for expanded carrier screening among women and couples undergoing preconception carrier screening.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Clarke; Jennifer L Schneider; Frances Lynch; Tia L Kauffman; Michael C Leo; Ana G Rosales; John F Dickerson; Elizabeth Shuster; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Genome sequencing of human in vitro fertilisation embryos for pathogenic variation screening.

Authors:  Nicholas M Murphy; Tanya S Samarasekera; Lisa Macaskill; Jayne Mullen; Luk J F Rombauts
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The ethics of preconception expanded carrier screening in patients seeking assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Guido de Wert; Sanne van der Hout; Mariëtte Goddijn; Rita Vassena; Lucy Frith; Nathalie Vermeulen; Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-02-12

5.  Simultaneous detection of genomic imbalance in patients receiving preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M).

Authors:  Lin Yang; Yan Xu; Jun Xia; Huijuan Yan; Chenhui Ding; Qianyu Shi; Yujing Wu; Ping Liu; Jiafu Pan; Yanhong Zeng; Yanyan Zhang; Fang Chen; Hui Jiang; Yanwen Xu; Wei Li; Canquan Zhou; Ya Gao
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Brandy Lamb; Erin Johnson; Shawn Gurtcheff; Naomi Riches; Melinda Fagan; Maya Sabatello; Erica Johnstone
Journal:  Ther Adv Reprod Health       Date:  2020-04-16

7.  Optimizing clinical exome design and parallel gene-testing for recessive genetic conditions in preconception carrier screening: Translational research genomic data from 14,125 exomes.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Roberto Alonso Valero; Jorge Jimenez-Almazan; Pere Mir Pardo; Marco Fabiani; David Jiménez; Carlos Simon; Julio Martin Rodriguez
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 5.917

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.