| Literature DB >> 28938653 |
Tao Wan1, Tianwei Zhang1, Xiaoying Si1, Yanming Zhou1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The clinical relevance of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progression has been highlighted during the last decade. The zinc finger E-box binding homeobox (ZEB) family, the zinc-finger transcriptional repressor (SNAI) family, and the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor (Twist) family, known as the prominent EMT-inducing transcription factors (EMT-TFs), played a crucial role in the process of EMT. Here, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of EMT-TFs high expression in patients with HCC after hepatectomy.Entities:
Keywords: EMT-TFs; biomarker; hepatocellular carcinoma; meta-analysis; prognosis
Year: 2017 PMID: 28938653 PMCID: PMC5601749 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18352
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Flow chart of literature selection for the meta-analysis
Characteristics of the included studies
| EMT-TFs | Author | Year | Country | Case | EMT-TFs Positive(%) | Treatment | Antibody | method | Outcome | MFu time (months) | NOS score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source | type | dilution | company | |||||||||||
| ZEB1 | Motoyuki | 2013 | Japan | 108 | 23 (21.3) | Surgery | goat | polyclonal | 1:100 | SantaCruz, CA, USA | IHC | OS | 60 | 8 |
| Zhou | 2011 | China | 110 | 72 (65.5) | Surgery | NA | NA | NA | SantaCruz, CA, USA | WB | OS | 60 | 7 | |
| ZEB2 | Cai | 2012 | China | 248 | 150 (60.5) | Surgery | rabbit | polyclonal | 1:100 | Sigma, St.Louis, USA | IHC | OS | 80 | 8 |
| Yang | 2015 | China | 92 | 21 (22.8) | Surgery | rabbit | polyclonal | 1:100 | Abcam, Cambridge, UK | IHC | OS | 60 | 5 | |
| Snail1 | Zhou | 2014 | China | 323 | 161 (49.8) | Surgery | NA | NA | NA | Novus, USA | IHC | OS | 60 | 6 |
| Zhao | 2012 | China | 97 | 57 (58.8) | Surgery | NA | NA | 1:250 | SantaCruz, CA, USA | IHC | OS | 60 | 7 | |
| Slug | Zhang | 2013 | China | 119 | 35 (29.4) | Surgery | NA | NA | NA | Danvers, MA, USA | IHC | OS | 60 | 8 |
| Twist1 | Zhang | 2010 | China | 100 | 70 (70.0) | Surgery | rabbit | polyclonal | 1:50 | SantaCruz, CA, USA | IHC | OS | 76 | 7 |
| Zhao | 2011 | China | 97 | 51 (52.6) | Surgery | NA | NA | 1:100 | SantaCruz, CA, USA | IHC | OS | 60 | 7 | |
| Niu | 2007 | China | 40 | 22 (55.0) | Surgery | rabbit | monoclonal | 1:50 | SantaCruz, CA, USA | IHC | OS | 48 | 6 | |
Abbreviations: EMT-TFs = epithelial to mesenchymal transition-inducing transcription factors; NA = not available;
IHC = Immunohistochemistry; WB = Western Blot; MFu = median Follow-up; OS = overall survival; NOS = Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Figure 2Forest plot of comparison between EMT-TF overexpression and EMT-TFs low/negative expression on OS in HCC patients
Figure 3Forest plot describing subgroup analysis of the association between individual EMT-TF overexpression and OS in HCC patients
Correlation of EMT-TFs overexpression and clinicopathological features in HCC
| variable | No.of | No.of | OR (95% CI) | Heterogeneity | Model used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| studies | patients | Ph | |||||
| TNM stage (III+IV vs. I+II) | 6 | 766 | 2.18 (1.08–4.38) | 0.03 | 76 | 0.0008 | random |
| Differentiation (poor vs. well+ moderate) | 5 | 435 | 1.96 (1.22–3.17) | 0.006 | 0 | 0.58 | fixed |
| Intrahepatic metastasis (pos vs. neg) | 3 | 258 | 2.94 (1.56–5.54) | 0.0009 | 0 | 0.86 | fixed |
| Vascular invasion (pos vs. neg) | 2 | 218 | 3.09 (1.67–5.73) | 0.0003 | 0 | 0.98 | fixed |
| Age (> 55 vs. ≤ 55) | 2 | 219 | 1.27 (0.71–2.26) | 0.42 | 48 | 0.16 | fixed |
| Gender (male vs. female) | 7 | 817 | 1.32 (0.89–1.96) | 0.17 | 0 | 0.80 | fixed |
| Tumor size (> 5 cm vs. ≤ 5 cm) | 6 | 687 | 1.09 (0.62–1.91) | 0.76 | 63 | 0.02 | random |
| Cirrhosis (yes vs. no) | 3 | 458 | 0.83 (0.55–1.25) | 0.38 | 50 | 0.13 | fixed |
| HBSAg (pos vs. neg) | 4 | 498 | 1.30 (0.75–2.26) | 0.35 | 0 | 0.89 | fixed |
| AFP (> 20 ng/ml vs. ≤ 20 ng/ml ) | 4 | 483 | 0.90 (0.42–1.96) | 0.80 | 68 | 0.02 | random |
Abbreviations: HBSAg = hepatitis B surface antigen; AFP = alpha fetoprotein; pos = positive; neg = negative.
Figure 4Publication bias using Begg's funnel plots for OS