| Literature DB >> 28938642 |
Jiao-Lan Qin1, Ting Meng1, Zhen-Feng Chen1, Xiao-Li Xie1, Qi-Pin Qin1, Xiao-Ju He1, Ke-Bin Huang1, Hong Liang1.
Abstract
Lysicamine is a naturalEntities:
Keywords: antitumor activity; apoptosis; lysicamine; metal complexes
Year: 2017 PMID: 28938642 PMCID: PMC5601738 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19584
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Synthetic routes of lysicamine (LY)
Reagents and conditions are as follows: a: (i) SOCl2, CHCl3 (75 °C reflux, 2 h); (ii) CHCl3, NaHCO3 (ice-bath, 2 h); b: (i) POCl3, toluene (80 °C reflux, 3 h); (ii) (CH3COO)3BHNa, CHCl3 (room temperature, 1 h); c: Methyl chloroformate (ClCOOCH3), NaOH, CHCl3 (room temperature, 1 h); d: tricyclohexyl phosphine [P(cy)3], Pd(OAc)2, K2CO3, DMA (120 °C, N2,5 h); e: LiAlH4, THF (reflux, 6 h); f: Mn(Ac)3, glacial acetic acid (80 °C, 12 h).
Figure 2Crystal structures of complexes 1–4
The aIC50 values (μM) of LY, 1–4 and cisplatin for the four tumour cells and the HL-7702 normal liver cell
| Compound | BEL-7404 | HepG2 | NCI-H460 | T-24 | HL-7702 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LY | 47.52±1.65 | 23.90±0.41 | 19.14±0.18 | 34.50±1.96 | 29.27±0.72 |
| 49.52±0.53 | 57.31±3.32 | 15.76±2.31 | 20.68±1.83 | 69.21±1.81 | |
| 18.37±0.14 | 7.56±2.91 | 10.01±2.39 | 14.29±1.05 | 35.08±3.34 | |
| 36.24±1.03 | 14.51±0.69 | 12.89±3.62 | 15.42±1.81 | 55.36±3.65 | |
| 29.67±0.96 | 35.46±3.99 | 8.17±1.69 | 16.25±0.93 | 34.59±2.21 | |
| bCisplatin | 12.41±0.38 | 18.51±0.78 | 18.29±1.02 | 28.07±1.88 | 15.67±1.27 |
aIC50 values are presented as the mean ± SD from five independent experiments. bCisplatin was dissolved at a concentration of 1mM in 0.154 M NaCl [46].
Figure 3The effects of 2 and 3 treatment in HepG2 cells on cell cycle
(A) Cell cycle analysis of 2, 3, LY and metal salt in HepG2 cells. (B, D) Effects of 2 treatment in HepG2 cells on cell cycle regulatory proteins at 3.5, 7.0 and 14.0 μM for 24 h, respectively. (C, E) The relative protein expression of each band = (density of each band/density of β-Actin band). Mean ± SD was from three independent measurements.
Figure 4Apoptosis of HepG2 cells induced by 2 and 3
(A) The apoptotic nuclear morphological analysis by Hoechst-33258 staining(magnification 100×) and (B) the apoptosis of HepG2 cells analysis by flow cytometry after 24 h treatment with 2 and 3 at variously concentrations for 24 h. (C, E) Western blot analysis of apoptosis associated proteins after treatment of HepG2 cells with 2 (3.5, 7.0 and 14.0 μM) and 3 (7.0, 14.0 and 28.0 μM) for 24 h, respectively. (D, F) Densitometry analysis from part C and E. The relative expression of each band = (density of each band/density of β-actin band). Mean and SD values were from three independent measurements.
Figure 5The effect of 2 or 3 on the levels of ROS, intracellular Ca2+, loss of ΔΨm and the activated caspase-3/8/9 expression after HepG2 cells were treated with 2 and 3 for 24 h, respectively
(A) The images of fluorescence microscope (magnification 100×). (B) The change of ROS, Ca2+ and ΔΨm examined by flow cytometry assay. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of activated caspase-3/8/9 expression in HepG2 cells after incubated with 2 and 3 at IC50 values for 24 h.
Figure 6Relative expression profiles of 89 genes in HepG2 cells after being treated with 2 (7.0 μM) for 24 h
(A) Cell cycle related genes and (B) apoptosis-related genes.
Figure 7(A) Circular dichroism spectra of ct-DNA bound to LY, 2 and 3 with [DNA]/[each compound] ratios range were 10:0. 5, 10:1.0, 10:1.5 and 10:2.0 (the concentration of ct-DNA bases alone of 1×10−4 M, dashed line). (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis mobility shift assay of pBR322 plasmid DNA (0.5 μg/μL) when interacted with LY, 2 and 3 with increasing concentrations from 10 to 100 μM.
Figure 8In vivo anticancer activity of 2 in HepG2 xenograft model
(A) Tumour volume vs days of treatment with 2 (7.6, 3.8 mg/kg/2 days), cisplatin (2.0 mg/kg/2days), or vehicle. Tumour growth is tracked by the mean tumour volume (mm3) ± SD (n=6) and calculated as tumour growth rate [TGI%] values. (B) Body weight change. Relative body weight by considering the body weight at the start of the treatment as 100%, the percent weight loss or gain was calculated on subsequent days of treatment.