Ketil Størdal1,2, Karl Mårild1, German Tapia1, Margareta Haugen1, Arieh S Cohen3, Benedicte A Lie4, Lars C Stene1. 1. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0403 Oslo, Norway. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Østfold Hospital Trust, 1714 Grålum, Norway. 3. Danish Center for Newborn Screening, Statens Serum Institut, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Department of Medical Genetics, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Abstract
Objective: Several genetic polymorphisms determine vitamin D status. We aimed to estimate the strength of association of established 25-hydroyxvitamin D (25OHD)-associated variants in the mother and in the fetus, with 25OHD concentration in newborn umbilical cord plasma. Methods: We randomly selected 578 mother and child dyads from the prospective Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort study. 25OHD was assayed in maternal samples taken shortly after delivery and in cord samples. We genotyped the mother and child for single nucleotide polymorphisms in or near GC, DHCR7, CYP2R1, and CYP24A1, previously confirmed to be associated with 25OHD, and computed genetic risk score (GRS). The genetic associations were replicated in an independent sample of 594 subjects. Results: Although both fetal and maternal GRS were associated with cord 25OHD, only fetal GRS remained significantly associated with cord 25OHD in a regression model with maternal and fetal GRS simultaneously (1.6 nmol/L per fetal 25OHD-increasing allele; 95% confidence interval, 0.6 to 2.5, P = 0.0001). Two fetal single nucleotide polymorphisms in the GC gene (rs2282679 and rs222040) were the strongest genetic predictors of cord 25OHD [4.0 (2.1 to 5.9) and 3.0 (1.3 to 4.8) nmol/L per fetal allele, P < 0.001], followed by rs12785878 in DHCR7 [2.0 (0.1 to 3.8) nmol/L, P = 0.037]. The independent replication sample gave similar results. With fetal genotype included in a regression model with environmental factors, R2 for cord 25OHD was 0.28. Conclusions: We show that fetal 25OHD-modifying genotype was a stronger predictor of cord 25OHD than corresponding maternal genotype. This raises interesting questions about fetal acquisition and placental transfer of 25OHD.
Objective: Several genetic polymorphisms determine vitamin D status. We aimed to estimate the strength of association of established 25-hydroyxvitamin D (25OHD)-associated variants in the mother and in the fetus, with 25OHD concentration in newborn umbilical cord plasma. Methods: We randomly selected 578 mother and child dyads from the prospective Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort study. 25OHD was assayed in maternal samples taken shortly after delivery and in cord samples. We genotyped the mother and child for single nucleotide polymorphisms in or near GC, DHCR7, CYP2R1, and CYP24A1, previously confirmed to be associated with 25OHD, and computed genetic risk score (GRS). The genetic associations were replicated in an independent sample of 594 subjects. Results: Although both fetal and maternal GRS were associated with cord 25OHD, only fetal GRS remained significantly associated with cord 25OHD in a regression model with maternal and fetal GRS simultaneously (1.6 nmol/L per fetal 25OHD-increasing allele; 95% confidence interval, 0.6 to 2.5, P = 0.0001). Two fetal single nucleotide polymorphisms in the GC gene (rs2282679 and rs222040) were the strongest genetic predictors of cord 25OHD [4.0 (2.1 to 5.9) and 3.0 (1.3 to 4.8) nmol/L per fetal allele, P < 0.001], followed by rs12785878 in DHCR7 [2.0 (0.1 to 3.8) nmol/L, P = 0.037]. The independent replication sample gave similar results. With fetal genotype included in a regression model with environmental factors, R2 for cord 25OHD was 0.28. Conclusions: We show that fetal 25OHD-modifying genotype was a stronger predictor of cord 25OHD than corresponding maternal genotype. This raises interesting questions about fetal acquisition and placental transfer of 25OHD.
Authors: A L Lauridsen; P Vestergaard; A P Hermann; C Brot; L Heickendorff; L Mosekilde; E Nexo Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2005-05-05 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Kjersti S Rønningen; Liv Paltiel; Helle M Meltzer; Rannveig Nordhagen; Kari K Lie; Ragnhild Hovengen; Margaretha Haugen; Wenche Nystad; Per Magnus; Jane A Hoppin Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2006-09-20 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Yiting Wang; Eric J Jacobs; Marjorie L McCullough; Carmen Rodriguez; Michael J Thun; Eugenia E Calle; W Dana Flanders Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Karl Mårild; German Tapia; Margareta Haugen; Sandra R Dahl; Arieh S Cohen; Marika Lundqvist; Benedicte A Lie; Lars C Stene; Ketil Størdal Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mengdi Lu; Bruce W Hollis; Vincent J Carey; Nancy Laranjo; Ravinder J Singh; Scott T Weiss; Augusto A Litonjua Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Akiko Suzuki; Kenichi Ogata; Hiroki Yoshioka; Junbo Shim; Christopher A Wassif; Forbes D Porter; Junichi Iwata Journal: Bone Res Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 13.567
Authors: German Tapia; Karl Mårild; Sandra R Dahl; Nicolai A Lund-Blix; Marte K Viken; Benedicte A Lie; Pål R Njølstad; Geir Joner; Torild Skrivarhaug; Arieh S Cohen; Ketil Størdal; Lars C Stene Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Rebecca J Moon; Laura D F Cooke; Stefania D'Angelo; Elizabeth M Curtis; Philip Titcombe; Justin H Davies; Keith M Godfrey; Jane K Cleal; Rohan M Lewis; Cyrus Cooper; Nicholas C Harvey Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 6.134
Authors: Michela Traglia; Gayle C Windham; Michelle Pearl; Victor Poon; Darryl Eyles; Karen L Jones; Kristen Lyall; Martin Kharrazi; Lisa A Croen; Lauren A Weiss Journal: Genetics Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: Akiko Suzuki; Kenichi Ogata; Hiroki Yoshioka; Junbo Shim; Christopher A Wassif; Forbes D Porter; Junichi Iwata Journal: Bone Res Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 13.567
Authors: German Tapia; Tommi Suvitaival; Linda Ahonen; Nicolai A Lund-Blix; Pål R Njølstad; Geir Joner; Torild Skrivarhaug; Cristina Legido-Quigley; Ketil Størdal; Lars C Stene Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-09-27 Impact factor: 5.958