Literature DB >> 28938268

Surgical and Survival Outcomes Following Pelvic Exenteration for Locally Advanced Primary Rectal Cancer: Results From an International Collaboration.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze data from an international collaboration, and ascertain prognostic indicators that inform clinical decision-making and practices regarding the role of pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary rectal cancer (LARC).
BACKGROUND: With improved national screening programs fewer patients present with LARC. Despite this, select cohorts of patients require pelvic exenteration. To date, the majority of outcome data are from single-center series.
METHODS: Anonymized data from 14 countries on patients who had pelvic exenteration for LARC between 2004 and 2014 were accumulated. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The impact of resection margin, nodal status, bone resection, and use of neoadjuvant therapy (before exenteration) on survival was evaluated using multivariable analysis.
RESULTS: Of 1291 patients, 778 (60.3%) were male with a median (range) age of 63 (18-90) years; 78.1% received neoadjuvant therapy. Bone resection en bloc was performed in 8.2% of patients (n = 106), and 22.6% (n = 292) had resection combined with flap reconstruction. Negative resection margin (R0 resection) was achieved in 79.9%. The 30-day postoperative mortality was 1.5%.The median overall survival following R0, R1, and R2 resection was 43, 21, and 10 months (P < 0.001) with a 3-year survival of 56.4%, 29.6%, and 8.1%, respectively (P < 0.001); 37.8% of patients experienced one or more major complication. Neoadjuvant therapy increased the risk of 30-day morbidity (P < 0.012). Multivariable analysis identified resection margin and nodal status as significant determinants of overall survival (other than advanced age).
CONCLUSIONS: Attainment of negative resection margins (R0) is the key to survival. Neoadjuvant therapy may improve survival; however, it does so at the increased risk of postoperative morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 28938268     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  15 in total

1.  Evaluating potential delays and outcomes of patients undergoing surgical resection for locally advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer during a pandemic.

Authors:  M A Javed; A Kohler; J Tiernan; A Quyn; P Sagar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 1.951

2.  Minimally invasive versus open pelvic exenterations for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of perioperative and 3-year oncological outcomes.

Authors:  M Kazi; N A N Kumar; J Rohila; V Sukumar; R Engineer; S Ankathi; A Desouza; A Saklani
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-09-06

3.  Complications and 5-year survival after radical resections which include urological organs for locally advanced and recurrent pelvic malignancies: analysis of 646 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Oliver Peacock; Peadar S Waters; Joseph C Kong; Satish K Warrier; Chris Wakeman; Tim Eglinton; Declan G Murphy; Alexander G Heriot; Frank A Frizelle; Jacob J McCormick
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  The impact of COVID-19 on advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  E M Burns; K Boyle; A Mirnezami; J T Jenkins
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Applicability of minimally invasive surgery for clinically T4 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Tso Liao; Jin-Tung Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach.

Authors:  Tetsuro Tominaga; Takashi Nonaka; Akiko Fukuda; Toshio Shiraisi; Shintaro Hashimoto; Masato Araki; Yorihisa Sumida; Terumitsu Sawai; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Impact of nutritional status and body composition on postoperative outcomes after pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jan M van Rees; Eva Visser; Jeroen L A van Vugt; Joost Rothbarth; Cornelis Verhoef; Victorien M T van Verschuer
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-09-06

Review 8.  Contemporary Management of Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer: Views from the PelvEx Collaborative.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  The influence of postoperative complications on long-term prognosis in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Clemens Beck; Klaus Weber; Maximilian Brunner; Abbas Agaimy; Sabine Semrau; Robert Grützmann; Vera Schellerer; Susanne Merkel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Opportunities and Limitations of Pelvic Exenteration Surgery.

Authors:  Björn Lampe; Verónica Luengas-Würzinger; Jürgen Weitz; Stephan Roth; Friederike Rawert; Esther Schuler; Sabrina Classen-von Spee; Nando Fix; Saher Baransi; Anca Dizdar; Peter Mallmann; Klaus-Dieter Schaser; Andreas Bogner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.