Literature DB >> 28937266

Statistical analysis of ADCs and clinical biomarkers in detecting acute renal transplant rejection.

Elizabeth Hollis1,2, Mohamed Shehata1, Mohamed Abou El-Ghar3, Mohammed Ghazal1,4, Tarek El-Diasty3, Michael Merchant2, Andrew E Switala1, Ayman El-Baz1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The main goal of this study is to determine which parameters [e.g. clinical biomarkers, demographics and image-markers using 4D (3D + b-value) diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI)] are more correlated with transplanted kidney status in patients who have undergone kidney transplantation, and can be used for early assessment of acute renal rejection.
METHODS: The study included 16 patients with stable graft function and 37 patients with acute rejection (AR), determined by renal biopsy post-transplantation. 3D DW-MRI of each allograft had been acquired using a series of b-values 50 and 100-1000 in steps of 100 smm-2. The kidney was automatically segmented and co-aligned across series for motion correction using geometric deformable models. Volume-averaged apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) at each b-value were calculated. All possible subsets of ADC were used, along with patient age, sex, serum plasma creatinine (SPCr) and creatinine clearance (CrCl), as predictors in 211 logistic regression models where AR was the outcome variable. Predictive value of ADC at each b-value was assessed using its Akaike weight.
RESULTS: ANOVA of the saturated model found that odds of AR depended significantly on SPCr, CrCl and ADC at b = 500, 600, 700 and 900 smm-2. The model incorporating ADC at b = 100 and700 smm-2 had the lowest value of the Akaike information criterion; the same two b-values also had the greatest Akaike weights. For comparison, the top 10 submodels and the full model were reported.
CONCLUSION: Preliminary findings suggest that ADC provides improved detection of AR than lab values alone. At least two non-zero gradient strengths should be used for optimal results. Advances in knowledge: This paper investigated possible correlations between image-based and clinical biomarkers, and the fusion of both with respect to biopsy diagnosis of AR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28937266      PMCID: PMC6047652          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  14 in total

1.  Assessment of allograft function using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  Anupma Kaul; Raj Kumar Sharma; Rakesh Kumar Gupta; Hira Lal; Abhishek Yadav; Dharmendra Bhadhuria; Narayan Prasad; Amit Gupta
Journal:  Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl       Date:  2014-11

2.  Functional evaluation of transplanted kidneys with diffusion-weighted and BOLD MR imaging: initial experience.

Authors:  Harriet C Thoeny; Dominik Zumstein; Sonja Simon-Zoula; Ute Eisenberger; Frederik De Keyzer; Lucie Hofmann; Peter Vock; Chris Boesch; Felix J Frey; Peter Vermathen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Functional renal imaging: nonvascular renal disease.

Authors:  H J Michaely; K A Herrmann; K Nael; N Oesingmann; M F Reiser; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2006-01-30

4.  Role of diffusion-weighted MRI in diagnosis of acute renal allograft dysfunction: a prospective preliminary study.

Authors:  M E Abou-El-Ghar; T A El-Diasty; A M El-Assmy; H F Refaie; A F Refaie; M A Ghoneim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Three-year follow-up of human transplanted kidneys by diffusion-weighted MRI and blood oxygenation level-dependent imaging.

Authors:  Peter Vermathen; Tobias Binser; Chris Boesch; Ute Eisenberger; Harriet C Thoeny
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement: a report from the Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program.

Authors:  Gary L Myers; W Greg Miller; Josef Coresh; James Fleming; Neil Greenberg; Tom Greene; Thomas Hostetter; Andrew S Levey; Mauro Panteghini; Michael Welch; John H Eckfeldt
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  CKD stage-to-stage progression in native and transplant kidney disease.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kukla; Madhurima Adulla; Julio Pascual; Millie Samaniego; Lisa Nanovic; Bryan N Becker; Arjang Djamali
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  [Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in diagnosis of acute rejection after renal transplantation].

Authors:  Jing-jing Xu; Wen-bo Xiao; Lei Zhang; Min-ming Zhang
Journal:  Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2010-03

10.  Detection of renal allograft rejection using blood oxygen level-dependent and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Guangyi Liu; Fei Han; Wenbo Xiao; Qidong Wang; Ying Xu; Jianghua Chen
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.388

View more
  2 in total

1.  Circular RNAs as diagnostic tool for renal transplant patients with acute rejection.

Authors:  Joseph B Moore; Michael L Merchant; Shizuka Uchida
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 2.  Renal Allograft Rejection: Noninvasive Ultrasound- and MRI-Based Diagnostics.

Authors:  Ulrich Jehn; Katharina Schuette-Nuetgen; Dominik Kentrup; Verena Hoerr; Stefan Reuter
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.161

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.