BACKGROUND: The CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine axis plays an important role in cell trafficking as well as in tumor progression. In colorectal cancer (CRC), the chemokine receptor CXCR4 has been shown to be an unfavorable prognostic factor in some studies, however, the role of its activated (phosphorylated) form, pCXCR4, has not yet been evaluated. Here, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of CXCR4 and pCXCR4 in a large cohort of CRC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A tissue microarray (TMA) of 684 patient specimens of primary CRCs was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the expression of CXCR4 and pCXCR4 by tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TICs). RESULTS: The combined high expression of CXCR4 and pCXCR4 showed a favorable 5-year overall survival rate (68%; 95%CI = 59-76%) compared to tumors showing a high expression of CXCR4 only (48%; 95%CI = 41-54%). High expression of pCXCR4 was significantly associated with a favorable prognosis in a test and validation group (p = 0.015 and p = 0.0001). Moreover, we found that CRCs with a high density of pCXCR4+ tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TICs) also showed a favorable prognosis in a test and validation group (p = 0.054 and p = 0.004). Univariate Cox regression analysis for TICs revealed that a high density of pCXCR4+ TICs was a favorable prognostic marker for overall survival (HR = 0.97,95%CI = 0.96-1.00; p = 0.01). In multivariate Cox regression survival analyses a high expression of pCXCR4 in tumor cells lost its association with a better overall survival (HR = 0.99; 95%CI = 0.99-1.00, p = 0.098). CONCLUSION: Our results show that high densities of CXCR4 and pCXCR4 positive TICs are favorable prognostic factors in CRC.
BACKGROUND: The CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine axis plays an important role in cell trafficking as well as in tumor progression. In colorectal cancer (CRC), the chemokine receptor CXCR4 has been shown to be an unfavorable prognostic factor in some studies, however, the role of its activated (phosphorylated) form, pCXCR4, has not yet been evaluated. Here, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of CXCR4 and pCXCR4 in a large cohort of CRC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A tissue microarray (TMA) of 684 patient specimens of primary CRCs was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the expression of CXCR4 and pCXCR4 by tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TICs). RESULTS: The combined high expression of CXCR4 and pCXCR4 showed a favorable 5-year overall survival rate (68%; 95%CI = 59-76%) compared to tumors showing a high expression of CXCR4 only (48%; 95%CI = 41-54%). High expression of pCXCR4 was significantly associated with a favorable prognosis in a test and validation group (p = 0.015 and p = 0.0001). Moreover, we found that CRCs with a high density of pCXCR4+ tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TICs) also showed a favorable prognosis in a test and validation group (p = 0.054 and p = 0.004). Univariate Cox regression analysis for TICs revealed that a high density of pCXCR4+ TICs was a favorable prognostic marker for overall survival (HR = 0.97,95%CI = 0.96-1.00; p = 0.01). In multivariate Cox regression survival analyses a high expression of pCXCR4 in tumor cells lost its association with a better overall survival (HR = 0.99; 95%CI = 0.99-1.00, p = 0.098). CONCLUSION: Our results show that high densities of CXCR4 and pCXCR4 positive TICs are favorable prognostic factors in CRC.
Authors: Joseph Kim; Takuji Mori; Steven L Chen; Farin F Amersi; Steve R Martinez; Christine Kuo; Roderick R Turner; Xing Ye; Anton J Bilchik; Donald L Morton; Dave S B Hoon Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Heather Hampel; Julie A Stephens; Eero Pukkala; Risto Sankila; Lauri A Aaltonen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Albert de la Chapelle Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Roderick J Phillips; Marie D Burdick; Marin Lutz; John A Belperio; Michael P Keane; Robert M Strieter Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-03-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Joseph Kim; Hiroya Takeuchi; Stella T Lam; Roderick R Turner; He-Jing Wang; Christine Kuo; Leland Foshag; Anton J Bilchik; Dave S B Hoon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Alexandros Lalos; Ali Tülek; Nadia Tosti; Robert Mechera; Alexander Wilhelm; Savas Soysal; Silvio Daester; Venkatesh Kancherla; Benjamin Weixler; Giulio C Spagnoli; Serenella Eppenberger-Castori; Luigi Terracciano; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Markus von Flüe; Alberto Posabella; Raoul A Droeser Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 4.379