OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of chemokine receptor (CR) expression in patients with melanoma and colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Murine and in vitro models have identified CR as potential factors in organ-specific metastasis of multiple cancers. Chemokines via their respective receptors have been shown to promote cell migration to distant organs. METHODS: Patients who underwent hepatic surgery for melanoma or CRC liver metastases were assessed. Screening cDNA microarrays of melanoma/CRC cell lines and tumor specimens were analyzed to identify CR. Microarray data were validated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT) in paraffin-embedded liver metastases. Migration assays and immunohistochemistry were performed to verify CR function and confirm CR expression, respectively. RESULTS: Microarray analysis identified CXCR4 as the most common CR expressed by both cancers. qRT demonstrated CXCR4 expression in 24 of 27 (89%) melanoma and 28 of 29 (97%) CRC liver metastases. In vitro treatment of melanoma or CRC cells with CXCL12, the ligand for CXCR4, significantly increased cell migration (P < 0.001). Low versus high CXCR4 expression in CRC liver metastases correlated with a significant difference in overall survival (median 27 months vs. 10 months, respectively; P = 0.036). In melanoma, low versus high CXCR4 expression in liver metastases demonstrated no difference in overall survival (median 11 months vs. 8 months, respectively; P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: CXCR4 is expressed and functional on melanoma and CRC cells. The ligand for CXCR4 is highly expressed in liver and may specifically attract melanoma and CRC CXCR4 (+) cells. Quantitative analysis of CXCR4 gene expression in patients with liver metastases has prognostic significance for disease outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of chemokine receptor (CR) expression in patients with melanoma and colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Murine and in vitro models have identified CR as potential factors in organ-specific metastasis of multiple cancers. Chemokines via their respective receptors have been shown to promote cell migration to distant organs. METHODS:Patients who underwent hepatic surgery for melanoma or CRC liver metastases were assessed. Screening cDNA microarrays of melanoma/CRC cell lines and tumor specimens were analyzed to identify CR. Microarray data were validated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT) in paraffin-embedded liver metastases. Migration assays and immunohistochemistry were performed to verify CR function and confirm CR expression, respectively. RESULTS: Microarray analysis identified CXCR4 as the most common CR expressed by both cancers. qRT demonstrated CXCR4 expression in 24 of 27 (89%) melanoma and 28 of 29 (97%) CRC liver metastases. In vitro treatment of melanoma or CRC cells with CXCL12, the ligand for CXCR4, significantly increased cell migration (P < 0.001). Low versus high CXCR4 expression in CRC liver metastases correlated with a significant difference in overall survival (median 27 months vs. 10 months, respectively; P = 0.036). In melanoma, low versus high CXCR4 expression in liver metastases demonstrated no difference in overall survival (median 11 months vs. 8 months, respectively; P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS:CXCR4 is expressed and functional on melanoma and CRC cells. The ligand for CXCR4 is highly expressed in liver and may specifically attract melanoma and CRC CXCR4 (+) cells. Quantitative analysis of CXCR4 gene expression in patients with liver metastases has prognostic significance for disease outcome.
Authors: M Takenaga; H Tamamura; K Hiramatsu; N Nakamura; Y Yamaguchi; A Kitagawa; S Kawai; H Nakashima; N Fujii; R Igarashi Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2004-07-16 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Daniel J Ceradini; Anita R Kulkarni; Matthew J Callaghan; Oren M Tepper; Nicholas Bastidas; Mark E Kleinman; Jennifer M Capla; Robert D Galiano; Jamie P Levine; Geoffrey C Gurtner Journal: Nat Med Date: 2004-07-04 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: J-P Spano; F Andre; L Morat; L Sabatier; B Besse; C Combadiere; P Deterre; A Martin; J Azorin; D Valeyre; D Khayat; T Le Chevalier; J-C Soria Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Eddie K Abdalla; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Lee M Ellis; Vickie Ellis; Raphael Pollock; Kristine R Broglio; Kenneth Hess; Steven A Curley Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Charles B Stevenson; Moneeb Ehtesham; Kathryn M McMillan; J Gerardo Valadez; Michael L Edgeworth; Ronald R Price; Ty W Abel; Khubaib Y Mapara; Reid C Thompson Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Thomas Dittmar; Christoph Heyder; Eva Gloria-Maercker; Wolfgang Hatzmann; Kurt S Zänker Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2007-09-08 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Frank M Speetjens; Gerrit Jan Liefers; Cornelis J Korbee; Wilma E Mesker; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Ronald L van Vlierberghe; Hans Morreau; Rob A Tollenaar; Peter J K Kuppen Journal: Cancer Microenviron Date: 2008-12-11