Literature DB >> 22020761

Sample size requirements for the internal validation of psychiatric scales.

Alexandra Rouquette1, Bruno Falissard.   

Abstract

The ratio of subjects to variables (N/p), as a rule to calculate the sample size required in internal validity studies on measurement scales, has been recommended without any strict theoretical or empirical basis being provided. The purpose of the present study was to develop a tool to determine sample size for these studies in the field of psychiatry. First, a literature review was carried out to identify the distinctive features of psychiatric scales. Then, two simulation methods were developed to generate data according to: (1) the model for factor structure derived from the literature review and (2) a real dataset. This enabled the study of the quality of solutions obtained from principal component analysis or Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) on various sample sizes. Lastly, the influence of sample size on the precision of Cronbach's alpha coefficient was examined. The N/p ratio rule is not upheld by this study: short scales do not allow smaller sample size. As a rule of thumb, if one's aim is to reveal the factor structure, a minimum of 300 subjects is generally acceptable but should be increased when the number of factors within the scale is large, when EFA is used and when the number of items is small.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22020761     DOI: 10.1002/mpr.352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 1049-8931            Impact factor:   4.035


  57 in total

1.  The Female Sexual Functioning Index (FSFI): evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Iris Bartula; Kerry A Sherman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the 'Fibromyalgia Participation Questionnaire' to the Spanish population: study protocol.

Authors:  M Gomez-Calvente; I Medina-Porqueres; A Fontalba-Navas; J M Pena-Andreu; C de Vos-Martin
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Psychometric properties of the Menopause Specific Quality of Life questionnaire among Thai women with a history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Warunee Phligbua; Ellen M Lovie Smith; Debra L Barton
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 2.398

4.  Psychometric properties of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life questionnaire in Iranian adolescents.

Authors:  Ahmad Shahabeddin Parizi; Gholamreza Garmaroudi; Mojtaba Fazel; Sepideh Omidvari; Seyed Ali Azin; Ali Montazeri; Saba Jafarpour
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Development and initial evaluation of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM).

Authors:  John S Cacciola; Arthur I Alterman; Dominick Dephilippis; Michelle L Drapkin; Charles Valadez; Natalie C Fala; David Oslin; James R McKay
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2012-08-14

6.  Comparing Different Partograph Designs for Use in Standard Labor Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Nigel J Lee; Jeremy Neal; Nancy K Lowe; Sue V Kildea
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-03

7.  Event-Level Associations Among Drinking Motives, Alcohol Consumption, and Condomless Anal Sex in a Sample of Young Men Who Have Sex With Men.

Authors:  Brian A Feinstein; Michael E Newcomb
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2017-07

8.  Electronic versus paper-pencil methods for assessing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Robert Knoerl; Evan Gray; Carrie Stricker; Sandra A Mitchell; Kelsey Kippe; Gloria Smith; William N Dudley; Ellen M Lavoie Smith
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Development of a French version of the Endometriosis Health Profile 5 (EHP-5): cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  Arnaud Fauconnier; Cyrille Huchon; Laura Chaillou; Gabrielle Aubry; Frederique Renouvel; Pierre Panel
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Perceptions and Behaviors Related to Contraceptive Use in the Postpartum Period Among Women With Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Laura E Britton; Diane C Berry; Jamie L Crandell; Jada L Brooks; Amy G Bryant
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2020-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.