Literature DB >> 28936276

Microscopic origin of wall slip during flow of an entangled DNA solution in microfluidics: Flow induced chain stretching versus chain desorption.

Orin Hemminger1, Pouyan E Boukany1.   

Abstract

Despite the relevance and importance of slip, a fundamental understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of wall slip in polymer flow is still missing. In this work, we investigate the slip behavior of an entangled DNA solution at a molecular scale using a confocal microscope coupled to a microfluidic device. From microscopic measurement, we obtain both the velocity profile and conformation of polymeric chains by visualizing DNA molecules during flow on various surfaces (ranging from weak to strong interactions with DNA molecules). In channel flow at a low Weissenberg number (Wi = 0.14), we observe a parabolic flow for an APTES-treated glass (with strong interaction with DNA) in the absence of slip, while a significant amount of slip has been observed for a regular glass (with a weak interaction with DNA). At higher flow rates (Wi > 1.0), strong slip appears during flow on APTES-treated surfaces. In this case, only immobile DNA molecules are stretched on the surface and other bulk chains remain coiled. This observation suggests that the flow induced chain stretching at the interface is the main mechanism of slip during flow on strong surfaces. Conversely, for slip flow on surfaces with weak interactions (such as unmodified or acrylate-modified glasses), polymeric chains are desorbed from the surface and a thin layer of water is present near the surface, which induces an effective slip during flow. By imaging DNA conformations during both channel and shear flows on different surfaces, we elucidate that either chain desorption or flow-induced stretching of adsorbed chains occurs depending on the surface condition. In general, we expect that these new insights into the slip phenomenon will be useful for studying the biological flow involving single DNA molecule experiments in micro/nanofluidic devices.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28936276      PMCID: PMC5578862          DOI: 10.1063/1.4991496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   2.800


  34 in total

1.  Hydrodynamic slip: Polymer adsorption and desorption at melt/solid interfaces.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 2.  Zeta potential of microfluidic substrates: 1. Theory, experimental techniques, and effects on separations.

Authors:  Brian J Kirby; Ernest F Hasselbrink
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Fluorescence photobleaching to evaluate flow velocity and hydrodynamic dispersion in nanoslits.

Authors:  Amandine Cuenca; Hugues Bodiguel
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Slip transition of a polymer melt under shear stress.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1993-01-18       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 5.  Future lab-on-a-chip technologies for interrogating individual molecules.

Authors:  Harold Craighead
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Giant amplification of interfacially driven transport by hydrodynamic slip: diffusio-osmosis and beyond.

Authors:  Armand Ajdari; Lydéric Bocquet
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Effect of YOYO-1 on the mechanical properties of DNA.

Authors:  Binu Kundukad; Jie Yan; Patrick S Doyle
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 3.679

8.  Generating aligned micellar nanowire arrays by dewetting of micropatterned surfaces.

Authors:  Piotr J Glazer; Leo Bergen; Laurence Jennings; Arjan J Houtepen; Eduardo Mendes; Pouyan E Boukany
Journal:  Small       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 13.281

9.  Microfluidic extraction, stretching and analysis of human chromosomal DNA from single cells.

Authors:  Jaime J Benítez; Juraj Topolancik; Harvey C Tian; Christopher B Wallin; David R Latulippe; Kylan Szeto; Patrick J Murphy; Benjamin R Cipriany; Stephen L Levy; Paul D Soloway; Harold G Craighead
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 10.  Zeta potential of microfluidic substrates: 2. Data for polymers.

Authors:  Brian J Kirby; Ernest F Hasselbrink
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.535

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.