Laura N Deden1, Mellody I Cooiman2, Edo O Aarts2, Ignace M C Janssen2, Martin Gotthardt3, Baudewijn W Hendrickx4, Frits J Berends2. 1. Vitalys Clinic, Velp, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands. Electronic address: ldeden@rijnstate.nl. 2. Vitalys Clinic, Velp, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: After Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), approximately 10% of patients have insufficient weight loss (excess body mass index loss<50%). Gastric pouch emptying may have a role in weight loss. OBJECTIVES: To compare pouch emptying of patients with poor weight loss and patients with successful weight loss after RYGB. SETTING: A research-intensive nonacademic hospital and center of expertise in bariatric surgery in the Netherlands METHODS: Female patients were included from among patients with the least (poor weight loss group [P-WL]) and the most weight loss (successful weight loss group [S-WL]) in our center 2 years after RYGB. Pouch emptying scintigraphy was performed after ingestion of a radiolabeled solid meal. Emptying curves, intestinal content (IC) at meal completion and after 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes, half emptying time, and maximal pouch emptying rate were compared. RESULTS: Five individuals were included in P-WL and 5 in S-WL, on average 2.5 ± .3 years after RYGB. Total weight loss was 18 ± 4.1% in P-WL and 44 ± 5.7% in S-WL (P<.001). In P-WL, a fast initial pouch emptying and exponential emptying curve was observed, compared with a slower initial emptying and more linear curve in S-WL. Faster emptying in P-WL was also shown by a larger ICmeal (42 ± 18% versus 4.0 ± 3.3%,), IC15 (76 ± 15% versus 35 ± 22%), and IC30 (85 ± 12% versus 54 ± 25%), and a greater maximal pouch emptying rate (17 ± 4.7 versus 5.6 ± 3.4%/min) compared with S-WL (P<.05). A linear correlation was found between total weight loss and maximal pouch emptying rate (Pearson R = .82, P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Pouch emptying for solid food was faster in patients with the least weight loss compared with patients with the most weight loss after RYGB. If pouch emptying is an important mechanism in weight loss, altering the pouch outlet may improve poor weight loss management.
BACKGROUND: After Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), approximately 10% of patients have insufficient weight loss (excess body mass index loss<50%). Gastric pouch emptying may have a role in weight loss. OBJECTIVES: To compare pouch emptying of patients with poor weight loss and patients with successful weight loss after RYGB. SETTING: A research-intensive nonacademic hospital and center of expertise in bariatric surgery in the Netherlands METHODS: Female patients were included from among patients with the least (poor weight loss group [P-WL]) and the most weight loss (successful weight loss group [S-WL]) in our center 2 years after RYGB. Pouch emptying scintigraphy was performed after ingestion of a radiolabeled solid meal. Emptying curves, intestinal content (IC) at meal completion and after 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes, half emptying time, and maximal pouch emptying rate were compared. RESULTS: Five individuals were included in P-WL and 5 in S-WL, on average 2.5 ± .3 years after RYGB. Total weight loss was 18 ± 4.1% in P-WL and 44 ± 5.7% in S-WL (P<.001). In P-WL, a fast initial pouch emptying and exponential emptying curve was observed, compared with a slower initial emptying and more linear curve in S-WL. Faster emptying in P-WL was also shown by a larger ICmeal (42 ± 18% versus 4.0 ± 3.3%,), IC15 (76 ± 15% versus 35 ± 22%), and IC30 (85 ± 12% versus 54 ± 25%), and a greater maximal pouch emptying rate (17 ± 4.7 versus 5.6 ± 3.4%/min) compared with S-WL (P<.05). A linear correlation was found between total weight loss and maximal pouch emptying rate (Pearson R = .82, P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Pouch emptying for solid food was faster in patients with the least weight loss compared with patients with the most weight loss after RYGB. If pouch emptying is an important mechanism in weight loss, altering the pouch outlet may improve poor weight loss management.
Authors: Ryan J Jalleh; Karen L Jones; Christopher K Rayner; Chinmay S Marathe; Tongzhi Wu; Michael Horowitz Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2022-10-04 Impact factor: 10.460
Authors: Catherine Tsai; Maria Dimou; Markus Naef; Rudolf Steffen; Jörg Zehetner; Christos T Nakas; Lia Bally Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-01-03 Impact factor: 3.453