Literature DB >> 28933902

Individual differences in verbal working memory underlie a tradeoff between semantic and structural processing difficulty during language comprehension: An ERP investigation.

Albert E Kim1, Leif Oines2, Akira Miyake2.   

Abstract

This study investigated the processes reflected in the widely observed N400 and P600 event-related potential (ERP) effects and tested the hypothesis that the N400 and P600 effects are functionally linked in a tradeoff relationship, constrained in part by individual differences in cognitive ability. Sixty participants read sentences, and ERP effects of semantic anomaly, relative to plausible words, were calculated for each participant. Results suggested qualitatively different ERP patterns across participants: Some individuals generated N400-dominated effects, whereas others generated P600-dominated effects, for the same stimuli. To specify the sources of individual differences in brain responses, we also derived aggregate scores for verbal working memory (WM), nonverbal WM, and language experience/knowledge, based on 6 behavioral measures administered to each participant. Multiple regression analysis pitting these 3 constructs against each other showed that a larger verbal WM capacity was significantly associated with larger P600 and smaller N400 effect amplitudes across individuals, whereas the other constructs did not predict the ERP effects. The results suggest that N400 and P600 brain responses, which may be attributable to semantic integration difficulty and structural processing, respectively, vie for expression when comprehenders encounter semantically unexpected words and that which option wins out is constrained in part by each comprehender's verbal WM capacity. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28933902     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  12 in total

1.  Lumos!: Electrophysiological tracking of (wizarding) world knowledge use during reading.

Authors:  Melissa Troyer; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  A Tale of Two Positivities and the N400: Distinct Neural Signatures Are Evoked by Confirmed and Violated Predictions at Different Levels of Representation.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Trevor Brothers; Edward W Wlotko
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  To catch a Snitch: Brain potentials reveal variability in the functional organization of (fictional) world knowledge during reading.

Authors:  Melissa Troyer; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Age-related Changes in the Structure and Dynamics of the Semantic Network.

Authors:  Suzanne R Jongman; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 2.842

5.  Grammatical processing in two languages: How individual differences in language experience and cognitive abilities shape comprehension in heritage bilinguals.

Authors:  Kinsey Bice; Judith F Kroll
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 1.710

6.  Testing the validity of a self-report scale, author recognition test, and book counting as measures of lifetime exposure to print fiction.

Authors:  Lena Wimmer; Heather J Ferguson
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-03-11

7.  Brain potentials reveal differential processing of masculine and feminine grammatical gender in native Spanish speakers.

Authors:  Anne L Beatty-Martínez; Michelle R Bruni; María Teresa Bajo; Paola E Dussias
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.348

8.  Functional Linking Between Negative and Positive ERPs for Syntactic Processing in Japanese: Mutual Enhancement, Syntactic Prediction, and Working Memory Constraints.

Authors:  Shingo Tokimoto; Yayoi Miyaoka; Naoko Tokimoto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-13

9.  A behavioural dataset for studying individual differences in language skills.

Authors:  Florian Hintz; Marjolijn Dijkhuis; Vera van 't Hoff; James M McQueen; Antje S Meyer
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 6.444

10.  Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults.

Authors:  Ira Kurthen; Martin Meyer; Matthias Schlesewsky; Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.