Catarina Rua1,2, Stephen J Wastling3, Mauro Costagli4,5, Mark R Symms6, Laura Biagi7, Mirco Cosottini8, Alberto Del Guerra1, Michela Tosetti2,7, Gareth J Barker3. 1. Department of Physics, University of Pisa, Largo B. Pontecorvo 3, Pisa, Italy. 2. Imago7 Foundation, Viale del Tirreno 331, Calambrone, Italy. 3. Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK. 4. Imago7 Foundation, Viale del Tirreno 331, Calambrone, Italy. mcostagli@imago7.eu. 5. IRCCS Stella Maris, Viale del Tirreno 331, Calambrone, Italy. mcostagli@imago7.eu. 6. GE Healthcare, Viale del Tirreno 331, Calambrone, Italy. 7. IRCCS Stella Maris, Viale del Tirreno 331, Calambrone, Italy. 8. Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Risorgimento 36, Pisa, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Signal drop-off occurs in echo-planar imaging in inferior brain areas due to field gradients from susceptibility differences between air and tissue. Tailored-RF pulses based on a hyperbolic secant (HS) have been shown to partially recover signal at 3 T, but have not been tested at higher fields. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of an optimized tailored-RF gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (TRF GRE-EPI) sequence with standard GRE-EPI at 7 T, in a passive viewing of faces or objects fMRI paradigm in healthy subjects. RESULTS: Increased temporal-SNR (tSNR) was observed in the middle and inferior temporal lobes and orbitofrontal cortex of all subjects scanned, but elsewhere tSNR decreased relative to the standard acquisition. In the TRF GRE-EPI, increased functional signal was observed in the fusiform, lateral occipital cortex, and occipital pole, regions known to be part of the visual pathway involved in face-object perception. CONCLUSION: This work highlights the potential of TRF approaches at 7 T. Paired with a reversed-gradient distortion correction to compensate for in-plane susceptibility gradients, it provides an improved acquisition strategy for future neurocognitive studies at ultra-high field imaging in areas suffering from static magnetic field inhomogeneities.
OBJECTIVE: Signal drop-off occurs in echo-planar imaging in inferior brain areas due to field gradients from susceptibility differences between air and tissue. Tailored-RF pulses based on a hyperbolic secant (HS) have been shown to partially recover signal at 3 T, but have not been tested at higher fields. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of an optimized tailored-RF gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (TRF GRE-EPI) sequence with standard GRE-EPI at 7 T, in a passive viewing of faces or objects fMRI paradigm in healthy subjects. RESULTS: Increased temporal-SNR (tSNR) was observed in the middle and inferior temporal lobes and orbitofrontal cortex of all subjects scanned, but elsewhere tSNR decreased relative to the standard acquisition. In the TRF GRE-EPI, increased functional signal was observed in the fusiform, lateral occipital cortex, and occipital pole, regions known to be part of the visual pathway involved in face-object perception. CONCLUSION: This work highlights the potential of TRF approaches at 7 T. Paired with a reversed-gradient distortion correction to compensate for in-plane susceptibility gradients, it provides an improved acquisition strategy for future neurocognitive studies at ultra-high field imaging in areas suffering from static magnetic field inhomogeneities.
Entities:
Keywords:
Functional MRI; Signal drop-out recovery; Tailored radio-frequency pulse; Ultra high field
Authors: Patrick S F Bellgowan; Peter A Bandettini; Peter van Gelderen; Alex Martin; Jerzy Bodurka Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-10-19 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Silvia B Bonelli; Robert H W Powell; Mahinda Yogarajah; Rebecca S Samson; Mark R Symms; Pamela J Thompson; Matthias J Koepp; John S Duncan Journal: Brain Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: P J Wright; O E Mougin; J J Totman; A M Peters; M J Brookes; R Coxon; P E Morris; M Clemence; S T Francis; R W Bowtell; P A Gowland Journal: MAGMA Date: 2008-02-08 Impact factor: 2.310